Multi-traditional
Hindu Temples in USA need focus on Spirituality and the Deity that Inspires Devo Ekah
PROLOGUE
My thoughts were drawn to a column by our popular columnist
Sarita Prabhu sometime back in Tennessean titled “Cultural Differences can
be topic of honest Conversation”.
Influenced by the wisdom contained therein I thought I should draw your
focus on some of my discourses and thoughts.
As you all aware Martin Luther King Jr. Magnet High School in Tennessee had for the
first time Diversity Day on March 14 in which students originating from 70
countries studying there, speaking 60 different languages at home often brought
up in their own culture at home but
studying together with fellow students with so much cultural differences almost
spending 30% to 40% of the day. In fact they are spending their active life in
a world of their own which is like a Microcosm. Children shaping out of such
diversity are often identified as products of American culture which is hard to
define. Varied Hindu cultures of migrants from the
Sub-continent of India, is equally as much diversified as these children. Unlike some
major religious groups of the world born and brought up in monotheistic,
one-track society, Hindu Americans know
how to survive and succeed and even out-beat the majority in multicultural
atmosphere in public life with which they grew up. They do not like to build colonies like the
17 Greek Fraternities in UTC campus who are dissatisfied with American
Culture. In public life Hindus believe
in Unity in Diversity. However, in religious
life they have moved too far from Universal Oneness of Sanaatana Dharma to
Multiplicity of Traditions making their religious life complex even in migrant
countries. Over a long period the
original four Varna Systems of Hindus have multiplied enormously as a
Birthright based Caste system and we have today more than 60 scheduled castes
alone in Hinduism with countless deities for worship due the political wisdom
of Independent India. If you ask a
villager in India to which religion he belongs, he will say that he follows a certain
deity! This has also resulted in countless political parties too based on their
religious bias. America has done a great
job assimilating immigrants. Hindu Americans though managing well in a foreign
soil as caste-ridden Hindu Society can do better and even lead the Country in
Diversity Stress Management like what MLK School does as Micro cosmos. My
religious and spiritual thoughts often pull me out of my narrow sectarian
Hindu-way of thinking and make me ponder over how we can find a common ground
with our cultural differences and make it
appealing to all without sacrificing in-built Hindu Values and offending
scriptures. Such integration is taking
place in the major religion of the Country too after having remained diversified for too long, to have
one unified church and one Mass Worship.
For such an approach among us we have to study a lot about our cultural
differences, have meaningful conversations, and find common grounds while
preserving our own Hindu Dharma Values with malice towards none. First generation American
Hindus though brought up with conservative outlook, have
learnt how to live with different cultures making compromises. However our inherent cultural differences
which we still practice in our private lives have taken a new turn as you see
in the little cosmos of MLK. We are
facing more problems by way of inter-racial and inter-caste wed-locks. Keeping these diversities in view I have brought forth a number of discourses
as to how we could spiritually orient ourselves gradually, focusing on one traditional worship and then leading it
to Universal Oneness as a unifying force. Such an approach will contribute a lot for
peace all around, healthy living, mental peace and progress and in the process
we will be contributing something to our country of adoption.
As Hindu Americans we have to focus on: 1) Living in Peace and not in Pieces 2) Integrating Spirituality into Western Lifestyles 3) Finding lasting happiness in daily life 4) Bridging Science and Spirituality to conflate with each other. We have to develop a culture of our own moving away from sectarian outlook we practiced at our homes if not in public life and brought to this country. We need to develop One Traditional Worship directed to one deity acceptable to all from among our own 330 million deities. God in his own fancy created us all look alike funny in the human form yet so different and we in turn out of love for him, multiplied Him too beyond His imagination though knowing well God has No form and no name, and the time has come to worship Him in any one form acceptable to all with the Wisdom of Vedas.
Some years back, Toynbee
Arnold in his address in Edinburgh University said, “In 50 years, the world
would be under the hegemony of the USA but in the 21st century, as
religion captures the place of technology, it is possible that India the
conquered will conquer the conqueror….. It is already becoming clear that a
chapter that had a Western beginning will have to have an Indian ending, if it
is not to end in self-destruction of the human race. If human race has to be saved, it has to embrace the Hindu way”. I
would like to say here Hindu American
Way as Hindus in India have not yet risen to seize the opportunity.
Our cultural differences
brought from India need to be overcome
and we should develop a sort of Hindu Dharma culture which would suit
all and also appealing to people who are fed up with their own religious practices and looking
for spiritual direction from Hinduism or Buddhism. Here Hinduism can be more
effective than Buddhism. I have therefore focused on some discourses that
should interest all, and to mention a few:
1) Smaarta Tradition springs out of Sankara’s five-in-one-worship for
all 2) Whose Abhishekam are we watching
on Mahasivaratri? 3) One temple complex
for many traditions overseas and other topics on Worships and rituals 4) Why temple outside Prakaras are painted
red and white? I have also focused on
many American Holidays as to how to make them appealing to those who have not
only moved out of Hinduism or resorted to atheism. We should make Hinduism appealing to them as a world religion suited for all taking back our thoughts to spirituality of
Sanaatana Dharma from the traditional Puranic ritualistic and faith oriented
worship, keeping its essential
traditional worship contents which
would promote spirituality and Universal Oneness in spirit, giving due credence
to age long practices where deserving. American Hindu temples have started the
process by ending all prayers for Universal Peace, keeping the temple open to
all who respect Hinduism for its spiritual values in its religious practices, and also keep it open on all American
holidays for long hours marking it as Special Religious Events Day making the
major culture feel we are alive to their culture too. We could study a lot and change our modality
of worship if we focus on these issues though not a serious concern for drastic
change immediately but need to be gradually changed, not to leave
it for resenting and abandoning all together in the near future. Otherwise we will not be able to revive the
principles of Sanatana Dharma: ”Eko
viprah bahudaa vadanti”,
“Vasudhaiva
Kutumbakam”, “Krinvanto
viswamaaryam” and “Sarve janaah sukhino
bhavantu”, etc., but
can parade in vain proclamations while not implementing. We have the right will which we need
to implement in all our followings, be religious or ethical.
INTRODUCTION
A casual visitor to a Hindu temple in USA is bewildered and
confused to see a cluster of deities forced by individual magnanimous
contributors, as well as, several kinds of worships and rituals going
on at the same time to suit the assembly of Gods in individual
sanctums that are unfamiliar to many participants often.
Cramped Sanctums of Gods have no place to relax or to communicate with their
devotees personally. It looks like
an Exposition than a silent place to worship.
Hindu Americans are drawn from different traditional family
backgrounds all of which they can’t adopt in public worship, living with a
major culture as well as several minor cultures too. They may
however practice them in their homes to possible extent. They are slowly
evolving for themselves a new culture known as Hindu Dharma based Hindu American
Culture. They are also trying hard to preserve their culture
unlike the Europeans who gave it up in frustration. Present Hindu American culture
is also fast changing as their children are attracted to find their partners mostly
from major culture Christianity and to some extent from minor cultures too.
You have seen how spiritual Yoga Has turned into Physical and Mental
Yoga, and celebrated on International Yoga Day. The religiously inclined philanthropists
are building more and more temples with the presiding deity of their Ishta-devata
(choice deity) with a long list of deities to suit different traditions and
worship directed by priests trained in India with sectarian views following the
preset pattern and frame of mind. Sometimes they are caught in sectarian
squabbles. This will neither be in the interest of present generation nor will
they be able to hold back the future generation in the fold of Hindu Culture or
better to say Sanatana Dharma Culture. Present temples may remain as
archaeological places of interest if not pilgrim centers or the
idols may find a place in an art gallery or museum like some we see in India
from ancient cultures for periodic exposition of our culture when these temples
are not able to sustain themselves economically if not made attractive to all
its followers. Think of the 108 temples organized and identified as sacred Vishnu temples in India by Ramanujacharya. Many of them are in a dilapidated condition and do not have funds for even burning an oil lamp. Heartbroken devotees are passing their hats around to save these structures. I wonder why rich temples in the group do not take care of them? I understand there are temples whose coffers are overflowing and temples whose gold reserves can't be estimated! Fortunately two of the temples in this group are in the heaven enjoying w Eternal Bliss. Charity begins at home!
It is therefore necessary to change our way of thinking of
sectarian based worship loaded with rituals copied from India witnessed
by a few more often than not and to think of ways and means for
mass worship, spiritual advancement and motivation to other
cultures or culture oriented for days to come. All this is possible
within our scriptural injunctions if properly thought about seeking help from
the wisdom of Vedas. We have here
enough guidance from our own past cultures based in India. We
have the choice to choose what is ideal for us. There is no meaning looking for
a total outmoded guidance from present India where they can afford to
continue with their sectarian traditions and fights which they have developed
over long years. Here we have “One Temple
for All Traditions” mostly. We have also seen how some rich and affluent frequently walk out and set up their own sectarian
or faith based temples in frustration or ego jeopardizing the economic
running of both the institutions for they have to depend on the same crowd as followers.
The present discourse draws its wisdom from the great pilgrim
centers of India which attracts people of all traditions with no caste or creed
discrimination and which have universal appeal and to those who are attracted to Hinduism.
They too have made some compromises here and there--for example, Bilva worship
on Vishnu deity and bathing ceremony of Linga and Salagrama together. This discourse
recommends Jagannatha and Venkateswara as ideal deities to suit American
Hindu Culture with the addition of non-sectarian based deities Aiyappan and Durga quoting the Wisdom of Vedas and Puranas as the ideal deities
appealing to all with focus on spiritual advancement. It also recommends
the colorful annual event of Brahmotsava
in these famous temples which will remind us of the Creator whom we do
not worship but venerate and at the same time preserving the colorful culture as annual event
in which animals also participate as divine
spirits which also finds favor with orthodoxy.
THE CONCEPT OF 33 KOTI DEVATAS
Before discussing the present day deities of worship in temples let us go back to Vedas
which came out initially with 33 Koti Devatas. No temples existed then. In Sanskrit Koti means
kind. Saguna Brahman needed 33 controllers in his management of Macrocosm and Microcosm.
With this in mind let us examine these 33 Vedic Gods:
The
Vedas do not refer to 33 crore Devatas
but 33 types (Koti in Sanskrit) of Devatas. They are explained in Shatpata
Brahmana and many other scriptures very clearly.
"Yasya Trayastrinshad
Devaa Ange Sarve Samaahitaa, Skamma Tam Bruhi Katamah Swideva Sah”.
--(Atharva Veda 10-7-13)
Which
means: with God’s influence, these thirty-three (supporting devatass) sustain
the world.
In
Brhadaranyaka Upanishad while discussing Brahman, Yajnavalkya is asked how many
gods are there. He says that there are three hundred and three and three
thousand and three gods. When the question is repeated? He says, thirty three.
When the question is again repeated he says, six. Finally, after several repetitions
he says ONE. (Chapter I, hymn 9, verse 1)
The
number 33 comes from the number of Vedic gods explained by Yajnavalkya in
Brhadaranyaka Upanishad – the eight Vasus, the eleven Rudras, the twelve
Adityas, Indra and Prajapati. (Chapter I, hymn 9, verse 2)
They are:
8-Vasuss, 11-Rudra, and 12-Aadityas, 1-Indra and 1-Prajaapati.
Eight
Vasus: Earth, Water, Fire, Air,
Ether, Moon, Sun, and Star. They are called Vasus, because they are abode of
all that lives, moves or exist. (Refer also to Mahabharata, 1/66/18)
Eleven
Rudras: The ten Pranas (Praana,
Apaana, Vyaana, Samaana, Udaana, Naag, Kurma, Krikal, Devadutta and Dhananjaya)
i.e. nervure forces which live in the human body. The eleventh is the human
soul. These are called ‘Rudras’ because when they desert the body, it becomes
dead and the relatives of the deceased, consequently, begin to weep. Rudra
means one who makes a person to weep. {Refer
also to Harivansha 13/51-52})
Twelve
Adityaas
---the twelve deities of the months of a
year called Adityaas; they cause the lapse of the term of existence of each
object or being. {Refer also to Mahabharata 1/65/15-16}
One
Indra: is also
known as the (all-pervading) electricity, as it is productive of great force.
One
Prajaapati: also called the “Yajna” because it
benefits mankind by the purification of air, water, rain and vegetables and
because it aids the development of various arts, and in it the honor is
accorded to the learned and the wise.
The
master of these 33 Devatas is the Ishwara (Saguna Brahman) who alone is to be worshipped
as per 14th Kanda of Satpata Brahmana.
DEITIES TO SUIT ALL TRADITIONS
A casual visitor
to a Hindu temple in USA is bewildered and confused to see a cluster of deities
forced by individual magnanimous contributors as well as worship and rituals to
suit them simultaneously going on, and at the same time unfamiliar to them quite
often. I have visited many temples in India where the deities all face the East
and occasionally North. In the temple of
Parthasrathy in Chennai and Jagannatha of Puri, Narasimha faces west as an
exception. They do have a puranic explanation for this. But nowhere any deity
will face South. But in American Hindu temple complexes I have seen many
sanctums in which the deities face
south also forced by space constraints. I wonder how this is permitted against
temple tradition! Is there a way we can have an understanding to have maximum two to four deities who would be
sufficient for our religious needs and prayers from among 3.3 million or so? In this context may I recall my remarks that
irrespective of their following (Vishnu, Siva or Sakta) in Sandhyavandana all
chant the names Achyuta, Ananta and Govinda in Aaachamana though traditions
interpret them to their convenience (read my discourse on 16-steps Pooja Ritual). Similarly, Kesavaadi Japam and Tarpanam are
employed, to purify or electrify body parts by cold water and oblate. If you go
through my most popular discourse on “Some Vedic Mantras
used in Worships and Rituals in Hindu Temples and Homes” there are several
mantras which are applicable to Brahma, Vishnu and Rudra together all directed
to Parabrahman which are employed in all sectarian traditional worships though they
do not use normally Rudram in Vishnu temple and Purushasooktam in Siva temples
for Abhishekam by tradition or compulsion quoting Aagamas. I am not an Aagma expert and I do not know
whether these sectarian views are correct? But it is interesting to note a particular
mantra in MNU which pertains to Gayatree mantra for Sandhayaavandana which has
been later abridged by Grihya sootras
to suit sectarian views:
Ojoci sahohoci balamaci
bhraajoci devaanaam dhaamanaamaaci
viswamaci viswaayuh sarvamaci sarvaayuh
abhibhoorom gaayatreem aavaahayaami saavitreem aavaahayaami sarasvateem aavaahayaami Chchndarsheen aavaahahyaami
sriyam aavaahayaami Gaayatriyaa
gaayatree chchandoe viswaamitra rishih savitaa devaagnir-mukham brahmaa
siro vishnur-hridayam rudrah sikha prithavee yonih praana-apaana-vyaana-udaana
samaana sweta-varna saankhyaanasa-gotraa gayatree chaturvimsati-aksharaa
tripadaa shatkukshih panchaseersha Upanayane
viniyogah ||
Oh
Gaayatree, Thou art the essence of strength. Thou art patience or the subduing
power. Thou art physical capacity. Thou
are splendor. Thou art the abode of gods
and their name. Thou art the insentient
universe. Thou art the full span of life
or the lord of all. Thou art the living
thing. Thou art the life span of
all. Thou art the vanquisher of all that
is hostile to us. Thou art TRUTH by the Pranava. I invoke Gaayatree into my heart. I invoke
Savitri. I invoke Sarasvati. I invoke the Meters, the Rishis and the Gods. Of
Gaayatree the meter is Gaayatree, the Rishi is Viswamitra, and the Deity is
Savitri. Fire (Agni) represents the mouth; the four faced Brahma, the head, Vishnu,
the heart; Rudra (Jathaadara), the
crown-hair; Earth, the source; the in-breath, the out-breath, the diffused
breath, middle breath, the up-breath and the breath. Gaayatree is fair in hue
and is of the same family of Paramaatman attained by the Saankhyas—the
illumined sages. The deity Gaayatree has twenty-four syllables, comprised in
three feet, six sheaths or cavities and five heads. It is employed in Upanayana, or initiation into Vedic
studies or studentship. [Evidently the Mantra says Antaryamin present in us as Microcosm
is Brahma, Vishnu and Rudra, and, all our worships should be directed to Him,
the Macrocosm]
Unfortunately
this full Mantra in not included in usual Sandhyavandana Mantras, knowingly or
unknowingly like the Kamokarsheet and Manyurakarsheet mantras which I have
discussed. Now you know why Kesavaadi Japa and Aaachmana though contains the names of Vishnu
found in Puranas are made universally applicable to all who want to do Nityakarmas (daily mandated worship) of three time prayers irrespective of caste or creed. Incidentally this is the Mantra that inspired
Grihya Sootras to come with elaborate details of Upanayana Samskaara. Supreme Being as the in-dweller and impeller of all creations
is called Savitar or Saavitree. The Vedas are represented as a Lake or
Saras which gives the waters of life and
hence Gaayatree, as the essence of Vedas, is called Sarasvatee. Thus this
prayer which is adapted in condensed form in Sandhyavandana addresses to
Brahma, Vishnu, Rudra and Devis. MNU also contains a Mantra:
Namo rudraaya vishnave mrityurme paahi |
Obeisance to Rudra who is Vishnu! Guard me from death! Vishnu means (vyaapyate iti Vishnuh) one who pervades all. Rudra means one who protects you from miseries (rutaat traayate iti Rudrah). So the Mantra only addresses to Brahman who is all pervading and that one who dispels miseries of all beings.
Narayansookta ends with the following:
“tasyaah sikhaayaa madhye Paramaatmaa vyavasthitah |
Sa Brhamaa sa Sivah sa Harih sendrah so-aksharam paramah svaraat ||
Parmatman dwells in the middle of that flame. Although he is thus limited He is the
four-faced Brahma, Siva, Vishnu, Indra, the material and efficient cause of the
Universe and the Supreme Self-luminous Pure-Consciousness.
Above all we have the Mantra:
Om antascharati bhooteshu
guhaayam viswa moortishu | tvam yajnastavam Indrastvam Rudrastavam Vishnustavam
Brhmatvam prajaapatih | [Brahman is addressed as Indra, Agni,
Jaataveda etc., in Rigveda and the word Brahman is not found]
Taittareeya Aaranyaka says: “Tvam streem tvam pumaan aci tvam kumaara uta vaa Kumaree tvam jeerna dandava checi tvam jaata bhavati visvato mukhah”—you are simultaneously woman and man; you are youthful girl and boy at the same time eldest. You are self-manifested and your divine presence is everywhere”.
The biggest mystery and surmise of all who visit Jagannath
Temple is which Gods could be on the Ratnasinghaasana to-day in Puri Jagannaath
and which were there before? Which are male deities and which or female? Common innocent devotees worship them as
Krishna, his brother Balarama and his sister Subhadra influenced by the
Vaishnava influence of Chaitanya Mahaprabhu, Jayadeva and others as well as the
great epic Mahabharata. The account given in Skanda Purana identifies Jagnaantha with Vishnu, Balabhadra with Siva
and Subhadra with Lakshmi or Kaatyaayini, Bhuvaneswari or Ekaanaamsa. Jagannatha is worshipped as Vishnu or Narayana
or Krishna and Lord Balbhadra as Shesha.
Simultaneously, the deities are also regarded as the Bhairava with Bimala (the Devi or the consort of Siva)
installed in the campus of the temple. So we find here a fusion of Saivism,
Saktism and Vaishnavism
of the Hindu religion with Jainism and up to an extent Buddhism in the
culture of Jagannath and the cultural tradition so reverently held together in
Purushottama Kshetra. It is
therefore no wonder Jayadeva included Buddha as an Avatar of Vishnu in his Dasaavatara
Stotra.
The
deities of Jagannath, Balabhadra and Subhadra always wear sarees and a nose
ornament made of flowers (probably introduced by Tantric priests who resorted to worship Him as Sakti). It is
said that until the British period, a Bhairava deity was sitting on the Ratna
Simhasana together with Jagannath. Another
interesting fact is that Bhairava Shiva is also identified with the Sun, with
the name Martaanda Bhairava (Moon shines from borrowed light of Sun and Siva is
known as Chandrasekahra. One eye of Siva is sun, the other moon and the third
Agni). The worship of Surya Narayana
(Surya is a Vyaahriti of Brahman who in Vaishnava concept is Narayana) is also
an extremely important part of the rituals of the Puri temple: the Surya Puja
is performed every morning here before any other activities take place in this
temple. The strict connection between Jagannath, Narasimha, Surya and Bhairava
is also confirmed by the prominent presence inside the Lingaraj temple at Bhubaneshwar.
But Saura Purana
in one of the hymns says that Sudarsana Chakra is another form of Lord Bhairava - Chakra Bhairava. This goes with the contention that at one
time Ratnasinghaasan was occupied by Sudarsana in the form of Chakra Bhairva. Probably
this temple inspired some philanthropists in USA to include Buddha and Vardhamana sanctums in Hindu American temples!
There is another famous shrine in the South, Venkateswara in
Tirupati. Who was Venkateswara? Today the devotees accept him as a
manifestation of Vishnu and a male. His identity has been a subject of bitter
debate for centuries. The origins of Venkateswara are shrouded in mystery which
will probably never be solved and there is no need to solve also! The word
Venkat--is it Tamil or Sanskrit? Vem means in Sanskrit dire sins and kata means
the immunizing power. According to Vaayu Puraana Venkata means “Destroyer of
sins” In Tamil Vengadan (kadan means debt) means burning debts. This has a
reference to Puraanas of Venkatesa’s loan from Kubera. Only thing we know is
Venkateswara is the Lord (Iswara) of Venkataadri.
Here also the biggest mystery of all those devotees who are
ignorant and innocent is which God could it be—Skanda, Sakti, Siva or Vishnu,
all or none? This has consumed enormous time and discussions of scholars and
has been the subject of bitter debate for centuries as in Jagannaatha Puri! As
is normal this is more debated in the South than in the upper regions of
India. Swami Pushkarani in Tirupati may
refer to Skanda (Skanda is often addressed as Swami) who is the God of Hills.
There are also frequent references in early Tamil literature on festivals on
the Vengadam Hill including hunting festival. The drapery of the Lord resembles Sari as in Jagannath Puree. The
ceremonial bath is performed on Friday as is usual for female deities. Thomalaseva in Tirupati is also known as
Bhagavati Aaraadhana (worship). The Vimaana of the temple mounts Durga symbol,
Lion. In Devi Bhagavatam the Lord of Thirumalai is described as Venkateswaree.
The deity is also called Balaaji derived from Baalaa, the Universal Mother
(Baalaa Tripura Sundari), woman name. So another view is that this is a form of
Durga or another Sakti. The Saivites maintain the matted hair, the cobra on one
arm, the snake ornaments and the crescent on the head are undoubtedly marks of
Siva. Pooja is also done with the leaves of Bilva which are exclusively used
for worship in Siva temples. Saivites
recite Vedas here and Vaishnavites recite Divyaprabhandam (Tamil Veda), a rare
phenomenon in a Vishnu Temple. A Jaina author of Silappadikaaram says, “Lord
Vishnu… is seen in a standing posture on the top of the Vengadam hill… adorned
with brilliant cloth of gold round his loins and… a beautiful garland on his
chest and holds in his lotus-like hands the invincible discus and milky white
conch”. This is an unbiased opinion from an author who is neither a Saivite nor
a Vaishnavite. Brahmaanda, Bhavishyottara and Vaayu Puraanas describe
Venkatesa as a manifestation of Vishnu.
Thirupullani is an important pilgrimage place
near Rameswaram—a place
where Dasaratha, King of Ayodhya of
Raghu dynasty was bestowed with divine nectar (Payasam/kheer) to get progeny and
where Lord Rama prayed
to Samudra Raja atop Kusa
grass to reach Sri Lanka. The Adi
Jagannatha Perumal Temple in
this place is one of the 108 Divya
Desams and a very important site related to Ramayana. So Jagannatha Temple of Puraanic concept is
not confined to Odisha alone. South
Indians would be pleased to see Brahmotsavam conducted to Adi Jagannatha.
The latest trend in India also is to have Siva-Vishnu Temples
like the one we have in Livermore, California. In USA generally temples have Siva
and Vishnu sanctums at the same level showing equal respect. The Mantras from
MNU cited above are probably the motivation for the icons of Venkateswara and
Jagannatha of Puranic days which
represent all three aspects of Brahman –Vishnu, Rudra or Bhagavti to the
seeking devotees and also Brahma the creator to whom a niche is always provided
in all temples on the Northern wall if not a sanctum. Sanctum for
Brahma for Moorti Upaasana (visible, vyakta form of worship) does not exist in Temple Traditions
because the World has all been created
and the task of Srishthi is complete about which humans need not have to worry.
They need to worry about Vishnu for existence and Siva for good departing or
moving forward for liberation. In male
chauvinistic society they think of Siva-Vishnu Temple only. After all man a selfish
animal! If Siva and Vishnu are to be effective they need their counter-part Sakti
too. However absence of Brahma in sanctums is a sort
of neglect or indifference both by the followers of Siva as well as
Vishnu. Otherwise how a lone temple can
exist in Rajasthan for Brahma in Pushkar and celebrated with all grandeur and a
Mela (Fare)? It shows clearly how we are dependent on Puranas for our religious pursuits moving away from Vedic Gods as functional aspects of Supreme Being and also not focusing on spirituality.
One should not think that the concept of Siva Vishnu temple
is a modern liberal thought. For this, I should draw your attention to the
famous ancient temple in Suchindram in
Tamil Nadu:
SUCHINDRAM TEMPLE....UNBELIEVABLE INTRICACY....NO AMOUNT OF
WORDS CAN JUSTIFY THE GRANDEUR...EXQUISITENESS...ETHOS OF THE ARTISTS CREATION.
The entrance tower to this temple is visible from a distance
as it rises majestically for 134 feet. The face of the tower is covered with
sculptures and statues from Hindu mythology. There is a covered area in front
of the main entrance and the entrance itself is about 24 feet high with a
beautifully carved door. There is only
one corridor running along the outer wall of the temple with many shrines and Mandapams
scattered in the inner area. This temple attracts both Vaishnavites and
Saivites in large numbers. About 30 shrines to various deities within
the temple complex; the large Lingam
in the sanctum, the idol of Vishnu in the adjacent shrine and a large idol of
Hanuman at the Eastern end of the Northern corridor represent almost all the
deities of the Hindu pantheon.
I often wonder why American temple should struggle hard with
sectarian worship and sectarian deities adding more and more deities to please
all, facing even South against temple norms! Why we can’t agree on one or two
deities as emanations of Nirguna Brahman in Saguna form? God created us out of
his own sweet will or play in this funny
human form and we in turn out of love imagine Him in several shapes and forms
some odd and some logical and some illogical for which Puranas have to come
with countless stories? American Hindus are a class by themselves
united by some sort of concoction of cultures recognized by the major culture. It
will be ideal to have sanctums of
Jagannatha and Venkateswara to
suit all traditions for temple worships and rituals for the reasons stated
above. The Hindu genius has the peculiar virtue of reconciling the
irreconcilables. At the time when Saivas and Vaishnavas were at loggerheads,
the story in the Bhaagavata of Siva being enraptured by the voluptuous beauty
of Mohini, the enchantress, came very handy.
Hari-Hara Putra or Saasta or Aiyappan was born to them. His worship
became popular among all traditions.
Aiyappan
could be a welcome addition in American Hindu temples for all traditions. Durga
represents Sakti aspect of Brahma, Vishnu and Siva as well as lesser
divinities. The powers of these gods
form her limbs and she carries exact duplicates of their weapons as you see in
Durga icons. Hence, it is logical to conclude Hari-Haraputra and Durga could be additional deities in
these multi-traditional temples to suit all. In one Temple for all traditions
Jagannatha, Venkateswara, Hariharaputra and Durga could be the four deities
that are needed utmost. I have not gone
into details of all these deities here as I have discussed the same in
individual discourses.
It is also interesting to note Brahma, Vishnu, Rudra and
Durga are all Vedic deities celebrated in various Puranas. You can always find
few hymns in various Puranas, dealing with a particular deity, where it also
says Siva and Vishnu are one and the same.
A Tamil saint says “Ariyum Aranum
onre” --Hari meaning
Vishnu and Hara meaning Siva are one and the same. This also goes with the
wisdom of Vedas “Eko viprah bahudaa vadanti” --The One, Pundits call by many
names or identify with many forms.
Here are some slokas from Koorma Purana:
Manyante
ye jagadyoniM vibhinnaM viShNuM IshvarAt | mohAd Aveda-niShThadvAt te
yAnti narakaM narAH || 87 ||
VedAnuvarttino rudraM devaM nArAyaNaM
tathA | ekI-bhAvena pashyanti mukti-bhajo bhavanti te || 88 ||
Yo viShNuH sa svayaM rudro
yo rudraH sa JanArdanaH | iti matvA yajed devaM sa yAti paramAM gatim ||
89 ||
Meaning: One who sees
the difference between Lord Vishnu and Lord Rudra due to ignorance and
meditation on non-Vedic texts enters into the hell. Those who follow Vedic
Marga see both Lord Narayana and Lord Rudra as one and the same and attain
emancipation. He who is Vishnu is Lord Rudra Himself and He who is Lord Rudra
Himself is Lord Janardhana.
Here is a rare Dasaavataara Stuti by Sage Gauramukha taken
from Varaha Purana/Chapter 15. It is mentioned that Sage Gauramukha attained
emancipation after worshipping Lord Vishnu with this hymn.
"Stosye
mahendram ripu-darpaham sivam
naaraayanam brahhmavidaam varishtham | Aaditya chandraasviyugastam aadyam
puraatanam daitya-haram sadaaharim"
We here periodically
American Hindus getting into all
excitement performing opening ceremonies
for a New temple dedicated to one presiding deity with a cluster of sanctums
built around as desired by the donors or
doing Brahmotsava to deities, leaving no
space for Gods to breathe. Even
prohibited south facing of Gods is violated! Brahmotsava is a tradition brought
from South India or guided by sectarian Pundits from India. Hindu Americans should be alive to the present
pattern of Hindu culture in USA and future of our children coming from mixed
culture popularized by inter-racial marriages who will shape the destiny of Hindu
American culture in USA in the future. In this context my above thoughts are
worth considering.
BRAHMOTSAVA ANNUAL
FESTIVAL
Brahmotsava is a special feature in South Indian Temples and
is well suited to Venkateswara concept and the tradition followed in South India
which should please others too. Lord
Brahma is supposed to preside over these ten days festival in which the deity
flanked by Sridevi and Bhoodevi is taken in procession on various mounts. Viswaksena (Vishnu form of Ganesha) and Sudarsana act as guards for the occasion,
supervising the ceremony.
Puraanas mention of several Ganapatis. Ganesha, the Saivites worship is known as
Ekadanta or one with single tusk. Under the command of Vishwaksena, whose
origin is much earlier than Saivite Ganapati, who keeps vigil on Paramapada
there are hundreds of elephant headed commanders having two tusks as well as
several horse headed commanders. They all wear Urdhwapundram or Srivaishnava
Naamam unlike Ganesha idols. Mundaka
Upanishad mentions of Lakshmi Ganapati worship for attaining salvation in the
awakened state. This Lakshmi-Ganapati is Sri Vishnu himself with Urdhwa
Pundram. Hence often Vishwaksena is compared with Ganesha of single tusk, son
of Paarvati of puranic lore and of later origin. He became single-tusked as he had to break one
of his tusks to etch Mahabharata on palm leaf. Tamils call him as “Tumbikkai
Aazhwar”—a Vaishnava
saint with a trunk.
Brahmotsava is a very colorful annual event which some
temples in USA have started conducting. This
necessarily includes different mounts for the Lord some of them worshiped
as divine spirits--Sesha, Hanuman, Garuda, Sweta Aswa (horse), Gaja
(elephant), Simha, Hamsa, Suryaprabha, Chandraprabha and Ratha. Thus we would not have forgotten Brahma and
also the famous Parivaras (family members) of Vishnu, Rudra and Durga. It would
also help in worshiping Hanuman who is the most favorite animal deity of all
Hindus who join together chanting Hanuman Chaaleesa. Hanuman carried
Rama-Lakshmana on his shoulders to Rishyamooka
Parvata to befriend Sugreeva. Jagannatha will be pleased with Rathotsava.
Normally the processional deity of Venkateswara in Tirupati
is accompanied by Sridevi and Bhoodevi though Padmavati lives separate. On
processional day of Simhavaahana Sridevi represents Durga (Vishnu component).
On Hamsavaahana Day she is Sarasvati. On Gajavaahana day she is Lakshmi. Durga pleases Siva too and He loves tiger
skin!
This will also be a good integration of Hindu migrant
cultures from North and South. While Soorya pleases Soorya-Narayana followers,
Chandra pleases Chandrasekhara followers.
I believe this is a wonderful way we can integrate all traditions under
one roof leaving lot of space for Gods to breathe and prayers focused. It is also worth considering including
a large prayer hall with OM symbol where devotees can sit and meditate for few
minutes before leaving the temple as is popular with Vivekananda Rock Temple
and Baha’i Temple in India. This will
progressively make them more spiritually inclined which trend is already on its
way in in Western cultures. A Yoga
center united by a common loyalty to Supreme Spirit for the purpose of helping
people grow in Body, Mind and Spirit will be a welcome addition and attraction
to preserve ancient spiritual culture promoted by Patanjali.
BROAD SCOPE FOR
WORSHIP, FESTIVALS AND RITUALS WITH MINIMAL
DEITIES
Brahmotsava is already in vogue in many temples in USA. This necessarily calls for Sudarsana (Chakrattazhwar)
and Vishwaksena idols as the secondary deities and as bodyguards. Venkateswara Abhishekam should be admissible
both with Purushasooktam and Rudram as in Thirupathi Venkateswara is worshiped
with both Bilva and Tulasi. Orthodoxy should have no objection as we will be
carrying out the tradition set by this Divyadesam. When Abhishekam is carried out with Srirudram,
Vishwaksena becomes Ganapathi as the bodyguard of Venkateswara
who is Easwara or Siva. In processional
deities Venkateswara if viewed as Siva Sridevi becomes Parvati. Siva (Prithvee
Linga) is worshiped as Mother Earth or Bhoodevi also and so there should be no
objection to Bhoodevi and Parvati together. Parvati is also the daughter of
Himavan, Mountain King! When Abhishekam is done with Purushasooktam and
worshiped with Tulasi Venkatesa is Vishnu. Srivaishanvas call Ganesha as Tumbikkai (elephant trunk)
Azhwar. When Venkatewara is viewed as Rudra Vishwaksena becomes Ganesha as the commander of Rudra Ganas. Sudarsana also belongs to Jagannatha
Parivara. Sudarsana was presented by
Siva to Vishnu which Siva also wielded.
Venkateswara is taken in procession with
Sridevi and Bhoodevi. Bhoodevi is a
constant factor. When Venkateswara is on
the mount of Lion Sridevi is Durga. When on the mount of Elephant Sridevi is
Lakshmi. When on the mount of Swan
Venkateswara is Brahma, the Creator and Sridevi is Saraswati. When on the mount
of Peacock Venkateswara is worshiped as Kartikeya where Sridevi and Bhoodevi
are viewed as Valli and Devayaanai. Some
view Venkateswara as Subhramanya. The
popular deities of Vaishnvites and Saivites to start any work should be Ganesha
in Saiva concept and Vishwaksena in Vaishnava concept. On Hanumantha mount Venkateswara
becomes Sri Rama with Bhoodevi representing Sita. Narasimha is always associated with Sudarsana
and Jagannatha. Thus with minimum
deities we will be able to please all
North, East, West and South Traditions of Hindu India and at the same time focusing
on Parmaatman or Narayana suited to Hindu Americans.
In Bhuvaneswar Linga and Salagrama are bathed together.
Hindus are lovers of Abhisheka for the deities and cannot avoid it on their
week-end worship in Hindu American Temples. This could be carried out conveniently on Lingas and
Salagramas and to the feet of the Lord or mirror image with minimal outflow of
materials and wastage. Excess material brought in could be diverted to food
bank for charity. This Abhisheka could be carried out chanting both Purushasooktam
and Sri Rudram as well as Chamakam as in present practice. This can be done
both in front of Venkateswara deity and Jagannatha Parivara. Devi images are also often times represented
in the form of a Linga, especially in the coastal region. Srisooktam can be added advantageously. So Durga deity could also be bathed in
Salgrama form. The usual colorful
abhishekam on main deity could be spared for an Annual event like
Mahamastakaabhishekha carried out to Vardhamana once in 12 years or to Narayana
in Melkote once a year. All these fit
into current practices as in the two ancient famous temples.
In Linga or
Salagrama Vyakta-avykta form Siva is represented by white
quartz from rivers like Narmada (Baana Linga), Devi by metallic stone
(Dhaatupatra or Yantra) and Vishnu by
ammonite from Gandakee River in Nepal.
YOGA AS A UNIFYING
FORCE LEADING TO SPIRITUALITY
We are told in Vedas “Eko vipraaha bahudaa vadanti”—The ONE (Spirit) Pundits call by many
names. “Yoga is all from One Source or
One Truth, the Gurus speak by many names and teach in many forms”—this is what
Yoga means today celebrated on International Yoga Day! This definition would attract all to the Yoga
center attached to the temple that will also slowly adapt ways of Sanatana
Dharma and realize the path of Universal Oneness. This will also make Yoga a
mission for the purpose of helping people grow in body, mind and spirit. It is worth reproducing here my recent
communication quoting an Islam Yoga teacher to make it universal in appeal.
“Everybody loves Yoga, irrespective of the religion they follow, for its benefits to grow in Body and Mind. What they do not like is its spiritual direction by way of chanting Om and breath control using Gaayatree Mantra. Recently I was taken by surprise by the broad outlook and wise approach of an immigrant Muslim Yoga teacher from Saudi Arabia who is at the same time a devout Muslim. Her understanding of Gaayatree Mantra based on an English translation is as follows:
“Oh God,
the Protector, the basis of all life, Who is self-existent, Who is free from
all pains and whose contact frees the soul from all troubles, Who pervades
the Universe and sustains all. The Creator and Energizer of the whole Universe,
the Giver of happiness, Who is worthy of acceptance, the most excellent, Who is
Peace and Purifier of all, let us embrace that very God, so that He May f
direct our mental faculties in the right direction”.
“Om tat
savitur varenyam | bhargodevasya dheemahi | dheyoyonah prachodayat ||
(24 syllables Gaayatree mantra
in which Om is considered as Hindu Sacred God; Om could also be
taken to mean Supreme spirit or Holy Spirit in which Abrahamic religions
believe or could be replaced by Amen or Amin)
She
replaces OM with her own mantra Amin and recommends similarly Amen to Christians and Jews. My own Christian Yoga
Master ends the class with three peace invocations: Peace within, Peace in the
outside world and Peace of God which passes all understanding.
I believe these
guidelines should be pleasing to all universally who are celebrating
International Yoga Day doing Surya Namaskar and meditation with various Yoga
postures. Incidentally the objection to Surya Namaskar is not to the yoga
posture but to the name. Here again this posture is not for worshiping Sun
as it is also performed in closed rooms. A religious Hindu looks at the Sun and
prays during Mid-day only. As you all
know there is a separate Hindu religious mantra in Mid-day Sandhyavandana to
look at sun with a hand gesture and aperture to look at him and pray which I
quote from my discourse:
"Then with
Yamapaasa mudra, an aperture made to
look at sun is made with both the hands and fingers (take guidance from your parents or priest) the following mantras are chanted: Pasyema saradassatam | jeevema
saradassatam | nandaama saradassatam | moedaama saradassatam | bhavaama
saradassatam | srunavaama saradssatam | prahravaama saradssatam| ajeetaasyaama
saradssatam I jyoekcha-sooryam drise || ya udagaan-mahatoernavaat-vibhraajamaanah
sareerasya-madhyaat samaa vrishabhoe roehitaakshah sooryoe vipaschin manasaa
punaatu||
[Let us live looking
at Soorya for hundred years, let us live for hundred years, let us rejoice for
hundred years let us enjoy for hundred years let us hear for hundred
years! May Lord Soorya glowing like a fireball purify our
mind!] This act not only seeks blessings from Soorya but is also
recommended for the health of the vision in Ayurveda by limited time direct exposure
of sun- light to the naked eyes].
Those who do not like Soorya
Namaskar may call it Chandra Namaskar, since Moon shines because of the
borrowed light from Sun and a satellite of Earth. Also this posture is
practiced within the room and not necessarily directed to Sun. Islam likes Moon! I believe no body objects
to the word “Namaste” as Christianity also believes in “God is within you”! My
Yoga class happily ends with the word Namaste being repeated by all
participants drawn from multi-religion and multi-culture. May be this word is
repeated to pay tribute to Hindu culture that gave Yoga to the world.
It would also be a good idea to start
teaching Sanskrit at least to a basic level to pronounce various mantras in
worships properly and also make them understand the
meaning of Mantras along with Yoga classes. It is also worthwhile starting Upanishadic
study and Discussion classes. In this
context I would like to quote Dr.
Oppenheimer, the great scientist who was the inventor of atomic energy and also
unfortunately the mass destructive atom bomb: “Access
to the Vedas is the greatest privilege this century may claim over all previous
centuries. There is no study as beneficial and elevating as that of the
Upanishads. It has been the solace of my life; it will be
the solace of my death”
REFERENCES
1) Nandita Krishna, Balaji—Venkateshwara, Vakils,
Feffer and Simons Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai,
India.
2) Swami Harshananda, Hindu
Gods and Goddesses, Ramakrishna Math, Chennai, India.
3) Ramachandra Rao, S.K., Vishnu Kosa, Kalpatharu
Research Academy, Bengaluru, India.
4)
Srinivasan N.R., Jagannatha of Puri and Ratha Yaatra, Hindu Reflections,
Internet.
5) Contributions from Muralidharan Iyengar from
Singapore.
6) Anblil Ramawamy, A Critical Study of Hinduism with Major World Religions, Sri Ranga
Sri, GA, USA.
[This discourse material is a compilation from the reference above as well as other sources for a prepared
lecture for delivering at Vedanta Class of Sri Ganesha Temple which is
gratefully acknowledged. I do not claim anything as original though I have
included my explanations and comments elaborately suitably editing. Anybody is
free to download partly or fully this discourse, modify and redistribute this
as well as other discourses from the
blog Hindu Reflections <nrsrini.blogspot.com> for spreading the wisdom of
Vedas and scriptures further. These lectures are
posted on the blog for the benefit of those who are not able to attend
my lectures personally due to personal reasons or due to not living in
Nashville or able to go through the various sources as I have done.]
APPENDIX A
Think and Plan for the Future.
"A
recent report from Pew revealed that
Americans affiliating with Christianity declined at roughly one percent each
year over the last eight years. The news sent shock-waves through
America's churches, as pastors and lay people struggled to comprehend what it
all might mean for the future of faith.
One person
who was not shocked was theologian and author Diana Butler Bass, whose book "Christianity After Religion:
The End of Church and the Birth of a New Spiritual Awakening"
predicted much of the data. For Bass, the religious news is a wake up call --
but not to a retrenchment of past practices; but a radical reassessment of the
way we understand and talk about God.
On this
week's ALL TOGETHER podcast I
speak with Diana Butler Bass, who has a new book coming out in October called
"Grounded: Finding God in the World, a Spiritual Revolution." Diana
and I talk about her new book, her evangelical past, the internet, where she
feels the church will be in fifty years and, of course, God"
The above
news from Huff-post should be a word of caution to American
Hindus who are at present concentrating on building more and more temples
without planning and whose children are finding their life partners in
the major culture who both in frustration turn to atheism. Though the End
of Temple may not come too soon because of the fun and frolic and
social values Hindu temples provide. There is also no need for the
birth of New spiritual thinking for us as we have a sound solid
Spiritual Universal Oneness foundation in Sanatana Dharma. We should only think
back on the Wisdom of Vedas. We should only prepare ourselves for a change
of heart from present sectarian outlook to turn towards spirituality and
make our worship spiritual directed to suit all traditions for
active participation. We all need a radical spiritual change.
On a similar
subject-- too many temples without focusing -- " One temple, one mass
worship attracting maximum crowds with limited festivals and rituals to
suit all traditions" I received the following comments from two prominent
Hindu philanthropists with active service to the Nashville temple which
needs serious consideration: These were
1) Very well said. I am with
you on this fully. I was also thinking the same about the
"competition" that is being built in many US cities targeting the
same donor audience. And this is not at all good OK on a long term.
2 )Very well said-many people
don't understand -How & Who will maintain the Hindu Temples -In many
communities we build Temples-Then communities live in pieces -Not in peace?
--Phil Goldberg
My attention got focused to the above two remarks from learned and active philanthropists on the above subject about which I had sent an E-mail. This convinces more than ever that we should think about the future and plan our mode of worship in temples to start with as Hindu Americans and not simply copying what is traditionally followed in sectarian oriented temples in India. Today's practices are based on what our founding fathers drawn from one or two Hindu traditions along with sectarian priests decided at one time. Nobody has the will to change it while at present many participants are saying "we do not know what is going on, but let us enjoy the fun". I believe religion and spirituality are serious business to save humanity. I often come across the argument we follow Agama or Tantric form of worship and follow Hindu Panchangas which we follow and we cannot go against Sastric injunctions. Well said and done. At the same time we want to celebrate Father’s Day, Mothers’ Day, Graduation Day, Valentine’s day Labor day, Memorial day and others keeping the temple open all day long calling it a Special Religious Event Day. Our festivals like Deepavlali, Makara Sankrati, Kartik Purnima, Onam, Karadiyan Nonbu and others were well connected to Purnas to make them significant days for spiritual awakening. Any American Holiday we think about for celebration should also be well thought about linking it properly for proper religious and spiritual explanations. That is the reason I have spent lot of time on these topics. May be I am not that rightly focused, nevertheless it opens the think-tank.
It is heartening to note that Religious landscape study shows an increasing trend of religiously affiliated to Hinduism from 2007 to 2014 ( from .4% to .7%)., nearly double. The cause of this can be attributed to fertility rate and immigration. If these moved to second or third generation as they integrate into the US and their children are born and raised in the US they may find their religious fervor dissipating too and may join the ranks of the religiously unaffiliated as the Christians have to-day, a national trend. People who described themselves as Christians have alarmingly dropped down by 7% (from 78.4% in 2007 to 70.6% in 2014) during the same period. Our temples have to play their part to avoid Hinduism sharing the same fate as Christianity or Hindus joining Christian lot who are lukewarm or casual to religion. As people become rich and affluent the natural tendency is to be indifferent to religion. Our temple programs should be more broad based to have maximum participation by all traditions and not confined to few on trivial many days. It would also make it difficult to run these institutions for which many philanthropists have contributed and struggled hard out of free will and raised the institution against odds in a Christian dominated country. United Sates remain home to many Christians than any other country in the world still and their missionaries are active in all parts of the world. We have to learn a lesson from them and spread the message of Sanatana Dharma which appeals to all human beings who are religiously as well as spiritually inclined. I believe these anxieties are reflected in the statements above from these knowledgeable individuals who are devoted to Hinduism. With a proper planning we can restrict our celebrations to important few and broaden their scope for equal and maximum participation and directed towards spiritual enlightenment without prejudicing our Aaagam or Tantric form of worships. This needs a will to change and plan. Hinduism has survived that long only because of its adaptability within the frame work of Sanatana Dharma and wisdom of Vedas!
I had also the following comment from the philosopher writer and author American Veda on the same subject some time back:
"You are quite right to bring this research to the attention of the Hindu community. The implications are huge. Not mentioned below are some other trends in the data, in addition to the decline in the number of people identifying with mainstream Christianity: an increase of interest among Christians and Jews in the mystical, or meditative, aspects of their traditions that were long hidden away; an increase in people who seek spiritual wisdom from a variety of sources; an increase in people who call themselves “Spiritual But Not Religious.” In my talks, and in “American Veda,” I make the case that this is a direct result of access to Sanatana Dharma through gurus, swamis, yogacharyas, etc. We are becoming what I call a nation of yogis. People acquired the notion of regular sadhana and practical methods to add direct experience to their spiritual lives.
It is heartening to note that Religious landscape study shows an increasing trend of religiously affiliated to Hinduism from 2007 to 2014 ( from .4% to .7%)., nearly double. The cause of this can be attributed to fertility rate and immigration. If these moved to second or third generation as they integrate into the US and their children are born and raised in the US they may find their religious fervor dissipating too and may join the ranks of the religiously unaffiliated as the Christians have to-day, a national trend. People who described themselves as Christians have alarmingly dropped down by 7% (from 78.4% in 2007 to 70.6% in 2014) during the same period. Our temples have to play their part to avoid Hinduism sharing the same fate as Christianity or Hindus joining Christian lot who are lukewarm or casual to religion. As people become rich and affluent the natural tendency is to be indifferent to religion. Our temple programs should be more broad based to have maximum participation by all traditions and not confined to few on trivial many days. It would also make it difficult to run these institutions for which many philanthropists have contributed and struggled hard out of free will and raised the institution against odds in a Christian dominated country. United Sates remain home to many Christians than any other country in the world still and their missionaries are active in all parts of the world. We have to learn a lesson from them and spread the message of Sanatana Dharma which appeals to all human beings who are religiously as well as spiritually inclined. I believe these anxieties are reflected in the statements above from these knowledgeable individuals who are devoted to Hinduism. With a proper planning we can restrict our celebrations to important few and broaden their scope for equal and maximum participation and directed towards spiritual enlightenment without prejudicing our Aaagam or Tantric form of worships. This needs a will to change and plan. Hinduism has survived that long only because of its adaptability within the frame work of Sanatana Dharma and wisdom of Vedas!
I had also the following comment from the philosopher writer and author American Veda on the same subject some time back:
"You are quite right to bring this research to the attention of the Hindu community. The implications are huge. Not mentioned below are some other trends in the data, in addition to the decline in the number of people identifying with mainstream Christianity: an increase of interest among Christians and Jews in the mystical, or meditative, aspects of their traditions that were long hidden away; an increase in people who seek spiritual wisdom from a variety of sources; an increase in people who call themselves “Spiritual But Not Religious.” In my talks, and in “American Veda,” I make the case that this is a direct result of access to Sanatana Dharma through gurus, swamis, yogacharyas, etc. We are becoming what I call a nation of yogis. People acquired the notion of regular sadhana and practical methods to add direct experience to their spiritual lives.
There is no doubt much for Hindus in American to contemplate in all this. Like Christians and Jews, future generations of Hindus may not go to temples just because their ancestors did, except for rites of passage and holidays (like Christians who show up only on Easter and Christmas). They will want to know WHY rituals are done before doing them, and will want teachings and practices that directly enrich their lives and elicit the spiritual experience that rishis pointed to.
At least that is what I surmise in my own research and conversations.
--Phil Goldberg
I had e received similar comments on the related subject as follows:
"Our general apathy towards our religion and divisiveness based on multitude of personal deities keeps Hinduism at a distant third place. And the only reason we occupy that third position is because of sheer population of India.
Our lack of systematic conversion process limits our numbers or even tends to decrease it. Therefore, we must find a way to advertise our unifying message and work towards that goal.
This will be possible if we make one temple in USA our focus point and provide a singular all inclusive message to all seekers of our faith. If Nashville Temple becomes that center of our faith; that will be most fortunate.
Regards
Prabir Dash
Jagannath Society of America"
APPENDIX B
SAKTA, VAIKHANASA AND PANCHARATHA THEOLOGIES AND TEMPLE WORSHIP
(Compilation by N.R Srinivasan, Nashville, TN., USA)
The Agamas are a collection of scriptures
of several Hindu
devotional schools. The term literally means tradition or
"that which has come down", and the Agama texts describe cosmology,
epistemology, philosophical doctrines, precepts on meditation and practices,
four kinds of yoga, mantras, temple construction, deity worship and ways to
attain six-fold desires.
The three main branches of Agama texts are
those of Saivism (Shiva), Vaishnavism
(Vishnu), Shaktism
(Devi worship). Agamas include worship manuals that
describe procedural details for worship in temples both elaborately
and with precision. The origin and chronology of Agamas is unclear. Some
are Vedic and others non-Vedic. Tantric worship
usually follows Shakta Agamas. Considering the manner
in which Saiva sects developed and crystallized
Sakta outlook one cannot expect the Sakta-agama to be well-defined or
unitary in character. There is considerable vagueness about the number of
texts, the nature of the texts, and the authenticity of the texts that
constitute Sakta agama. The affiliations of what we know as Sakta agama to the
Vedic corpus is highly uncertain. Agama literature is voluminous, and includes
28 Shaiva Agamas, 77 Shakta Agamas (also called Tantras), and 108 Vaishnava
Agamas (also called Pancharatra Samhitas), and numerous
Upa-Agamas.
It may appear the hold of Agamas in temple
worship is stronger in South India than in their North Indian counterparts, but
among the more celebrated temples in the North like Varanasi, Dwaraka, Puri
Jagannath, Kamakhya, Badrinath etc., Agamas do play a very significant
role. Scholars note that some passages in the Hindu
Agama texts appear to repudiate the authority of the Vedas, while
other passages assert that their precepts reveal the true spirit of the Vedas.
Worship in a household shrine is termed Svartha, for
his immediate family or for himself/herself while worship in a
temple is carried out by the priests for the sake of devotees who gather
there and hence called Paraartha. The most significant aspect of
the worship in a temple is its collective character. The worship that priest
conducts is symbolic of the worship conducted by the community. Since the
community is actually involved in the worship conducted in a temple
the rituals acquire a public character. Hence this public worship
should be followed by meditation and spiritually oriented as final part of the
worship as I have ben often stressing. The more learned and conservative among
Brahmins consider worship in a temple is not suitable for truly religious
person who is evolved. Idolatry itself is the lowest form of worship,
prescribed in the texts only, but not in Vedas, for a person of ordinary
equipment and inclination. Carrying on worship in public smacks of
exhibitionism; the display of religious fervor in public is denounced in the
scripture as vulgar. Worship which involves remuneration or recompense is in
reality a business transaction and fails to bring about spiritual benefits. All
acts of worship can only be personal; scriptures do not commend collective
worship. Mental worship or meditation is thought to be the best form of worship
in Hinduism. But the vast majority of worshipers may not find mental worship
that appealing or easy to perform. The scriptures prescribe external ritualistic
worship for such worshipers. Through ritualistic worship they gradually make
spiritual progress and become ready for mental worship or meditation.
For Hindu Americans all these has to be
done in the temple serene atmosphere and therefore the temples situated in
Ashramas or monasteries in USA have made provisions for preliminary worship
and final meditation. They have also successfully blended tantric
Kundalini concepts with Yoga and meditation. They have suitably blended
Vedic and Tantric wisdoms in their yogic spiritual practice.
Some serious religiously evolved Hindu Americans take a break from their
busy life and spend some time in these monasteries to train themselves
spiritually. This is their pilgrimage. But such monasteries are few and
far between. In this context you may be interested to go through my exchange of
thoughts with an evolved religious Hindu American as attached. I
have also added to it Panchratra and Vaikhanasa agama concepts employed in
temple worship. As far as my knowledge goes Memphis temple in USA follows
Vaikhanasa agama like Thirupati Venkartesvara temple and Parthasarthy
temple in Chennai. I have delivered a discourse on Pancharatra
Theology.
It is also interesting observe that our temple
authorities have also suitably programed the worship of deities like
Saibaba, Buddha, Jina, Nagdevata, Swami Narayan etc., and also celebrate
Valentine’s day, Mother’s Day, Father’s Day, Labor Day etc., within the
discipline of conventional Agamas to observe as Special Religious
Day. This may be called American Hindu Agama like Tantric agama (Tricky
agama). It is also interesting to note a modern poetic composition like “Om
Jaya Jagadisa Hare” as well as old Kalidasa poetic
composition has become concluding mantra in American Hindu Temple worships
replacing” Kayena vacaha”. Probably Narayana is considered sectarian
Vishnu god and hence substituted by Om Jaya Jagadisa to appeal to the
supreme in popular Hindi language one exception made to move from
Sanskrit while rest of the ritual is in Sanskrit . I wonder why a
simple Gayatri Mantra “Om tad Brahma tad Vayu tad Atma tat Sathyam tat
Sarvam tat puror namah” is not employed as per Agama
directives. Also agamas guide last mantra to be a Kshamaapana mantra or sloka like
“kayena vacha”. Instead we plead to Supreme with the mantra “Asato maa sad
Gamaya… Mrityormaa Amritam Gamaya” pleading for Immortality. Good Lord knows
what we deserve based on Karma and therefore it is best to leave it to
him as Vedas say “yad bhadram tanma asuva”. That is why in
conventional temple worship the concluding prayer is “Kshamaapana” asking
his pardon for any commission or omission. Also Ishta Devatas grant us limited
desires expressed in Sanklpa if reasonable but can’t grant Immortality or
Liberation and therefore the last prayer is usually best directed to “Tad
Brahma” and not this Devata whom we worship followed by few minutes meditation
in a silent place!
SAKTA CONCEPT OF SACRED GEOMETRY
QUESTION
May I request for your research on shapes and designs in Indian
scriptures and texts. I am particularly interested in finding out after I
visited Isha abode for Adiyogi in Mcminville; Triangle, Hexagon, octagon,
swastika, circles and hearts, mandalas, chakras etc. referred in tantric texts, and Shaktha
literature.
ANSWER
I am neither knowledgeable nor
resourceful to answer your complicated question. Yet I have tried to give suitable explanation as under:
Mental worship or meditation is
thought to be the best form of worship in Hinduism. But vast majority of worshipers find mental worship is not appealing or easy
to perform. The scriptures therefore
prescribes external ritualistic worship for such worshipers. Through
ritualistic worship they should gradually make spiritual progress and becomes
ready for mental worship or meditation. In Ramayana Sri Rama recommended Murti
Upasans to Vibhishana by advocating “Aradhaya
Jagannatham” while he himself meditated on the cavity of heart of Aditya
that is Parabrahman by Aditya Hridayam.
This gives two levels of worship—preliminary and advanced. Our temples
are designed for the preliminary stage only as in India which is not ideal for
the highly intelligent crowd. America is different from India where the worship
and meditation continue at several places.
Parama Samhita explains the
anthropomorphic necessity of iconic representations. The devotee being
human can communicate well with an icon
with the human form. For seated figures
texts like Ahirbudhnya Samhita prescribe as many as eleven variant postures.
Circular-Padmasana, rectangular-Simhasana, triangular (anntaasana), octagonal
(yogasana), hexagonal (Vimalasana) and
so on. It is also customary to use detachable seats of different forms in
different stages of the worship ritual like simhasana for bathing, yogasana for
invocation, anantasana for witnessing amusements and Vimalasan for receiving
offers made. These are inspired by Yogasatra and the institutions you visited
are mainly Yoga and meditation oriented.
Speaking of the geometrical forms, we
need to remember that all icons have their graphic representations (yantras) as
well as verbalizations (mantras) during the worship. The Yantras are prepared
and employed and mantras are chanted. This again is Tantra form of worship
mainly prevalent with Saiva oriented Sakti-ism. The Devi is often worshiped in
the Srichakra either as a linear diagram or as an an-iconic image (Meru)-- the
lentil gopuram type decoration we saw during Kalyanotsavam represents Meru
(maniparuppu). This is regarded as powerful
yantra.
Yantras are installed in many shrines
for ceremonial worship based on Tantra
worship. The most well-known of the yantras is the Sri Yantra also called Sri chakra . It
is composed of 43 triangles, 28 secret spots and 24 joints. The design is an
integration of nine chakras, four of Siva and five of Sakti which are
superimposes on each other to show the union of male and female
principles. The whole yantra is said to
be a representation of the Devi, Rajarajesvari.
The Sakta worship assumes three
variant modes: Kundalini Krama where
they arousal of Kundalini figures prominently and is Sattvika in character
(Sadguru approach); Sundaree Krama where Sri chakra is worshiped which is
Rajasic in character; and Samavarodhini Krama where Bhairavi chakra is
resorted to which is Tamasika in
character.
Agama was originally meant the
extension of Vedic scripture, but in due course has become a practical manual
of worship and meditation. There are two traditions in Temple traditions with
great antiquity; Vedic and Tantric.
Agama as it became distinguished from the typical Vedic outlook is now
known as Nigama, attempts a synthesis of these two traditions. Srividya about which I talked about in the
past is distinguished by an integral approach involving Vedic ideology and
Tantrik practices. Unfortunately Agama has now become as bundle of sectarian
cults, the only unifying thought being Upasana. The object of worship differ
but the act of worship is the same_directed to Brahmopasana.
That is why swami Chidananda speaks
of two different approaches in temple worship:
The Vedic/Agamic approach in describing temple worship stresses that
Hindus all worship One Supreme Being (Deva), though by different
names and through different traditions.
The Puranic approach presents the idea that Hindus worship a trinity
and its several separate Gods (devatas) and do not worship a Supreme Being.
The Vedic Aagama approach is ideally suited to
Hindu Americans with focus on a symbolic deity Venkatesvara, the most worshiped
deity in the world, ideal for all traditions and religions bringing forth the
concept of Eko viprah bahuda vadanti.
All said and done Hindus cannot easily come out of Puranic approach as well as
its exciting pomp and show of ritualistic worship cultivated by sectarian
Agamas. But its implied object is defeated.
Fun remains; spiritual goal is never focused creating several levels of
desires now and after. Also it is felt
that this helps children to carry through at KG level. But they are never
taught Sanskrit and Vedas by trained teachers or gurus. That is why
Chimayananda suggests two approaches. Regular worship followed by meditation
for at least 15 to 30 minutes in a meditation hall with the simple Gayatri “Om Tad Brahma, tad vayu, tad Atma, tat
Sathyam, tat Sarvam tat Puror Namah” properly explained and initiated.
Venkatesvara will no doubt fulfill our Puranic appetite with Brahmotsava
included and also the need for regular flow of funds to maintain the temple
according to present practices. This will fulfil all the goals of Dharma, Artha, Kama and Moksha. That was the
background of my recent discourse sent to you. It is thus an evolution and not
revolution. I have also circulated to you what is happening with the major
religion Christianity who are also ailing with 40% declaring SBNR to realize
the universal problem. Someone need to find solution: Here we as Hindus are
better experienced.
You must also remember all the
Ashramas we visit in USA are founded by Gurus who have been born Saivites and
for long trained in Saivisam and are Advaita followers. They are well
read, forceful and progressive. That has the reflection in their philosophy however they may try to
hide. You can also see the typical presiding deity of their temples! Similarly
ISKCON born Vaishnavites are motivated by Gaudiya Sampradaya and committed to
it. It is therefore advisable to take the best things coming out of them, Yoga
and Meditation and plan our own worship pattern.
I have discussed all these things in
tits and bits in all my discourses based on which I focused on my last
discourse now posted as most suitable for not only unifying us but also help us
in leading the country spiritually without upsetting the current base so deeply
engrossed in Puranas, rituals and
rivalry, but also benefiting by the wisdom of Vedas and inspiration from
modern Gurus who themselves have made much deeper study and spreading their
spiritual message in USA.
My following discourses will also
help to answer your question.
SACRED SAKTA
GEOMETRIC FIGURES
A yantra is a geometrical pattern made of several concentric
figures (squares, circles, lotuses, triangles, point). The point (bindu) at the
center of the yantra signifies unity, the origin, the principle of
manifestation and emanation. A yantra is the yogic equivalent of the Buddhist
mandala.
When these concentric figures are gradually growing away from its
center (bindu) in stages, this is for human beings a symbol of the process of
macrocosmic evolution.
When they are gradually growing towards its center, this is for
human beings a symbol of the process of microcosmic involution.
According to Tantra, the creation of the world begins with an act
of division of the opposites that are united in the deity. From their splitting
arises, in an explosion of energy, the multiplicity of the world. Starting from
pure unity (Shiva), the world is a continuous unfolding (energized by the power
of Shakti), until a state is reached, when the process must reverse and
involute back to the very beginning. Multiplicity must once again become unity.
Yantras are symbolic representations of this process of evolution and
involution.
According to Tantra, the human being is a miniature universe. All
that is found in the cosmos can be found within each individual, and the same
principles that apply to the universe apply in the case of the individual
being. For human beings the body is considered the most perfect and powerful of
all yantras and is seen as a tool for inner awareness.
A yantra is thus a tool making the process of evolution conscious
to the adept of Tantrism. It enables the adept to retrace his steps from the
outward-directed world of multiplicity to the inward focus of unity.
All primal shapes of a yantra are psychological symbols
corresponding to inner states of human consciousness. Yantras are sacred
symbols of the process of involution and evolution.
The
Yantric Contour--Every YANTRA is delimited from the exterior
by a line or a group of lines forming its perimeter. These marginal lines have
the function to maintain, contain and prevent the loss of the magical forces
represented by the core structure of the YANTRA, usually the central dot. They
also have the function to increase its magical and subtle force.
The core of the YANTRA is composed of one or
several simple geometrical shapes: dots, lines, triangles, squares, circles and
lotuses representing in different ways the subtle energies.
The Dot (BINDU): For example the
dot (BINDU) signifies the focalized energy and its intense concentration. It
can be envisaged as a kind of energy deposit which can in turn radiate energy
under other forms. The dot is usually surrounded by different surfaces, either
a triangle, a hexagon, a circle etc. These forms depend on the characteristic
of the deity or aspect represented by the YANTRA. In the tantric iconography,
the dot is named BINDU; in tantra BINDU is
symbolically considered to be SHIVA himself, the
source of the whole creation.
The Triangle (TRIKONA): The triangle
(TRIKONA) is the symbol of SHAKTI, the feminine
energy or aspect of Creation. The triangle pointing down represents the YONI, the feminine
sexual organ and the symbol of the supreme source of the Universe, and when the
triangle is pointing upwards it signifies intense spiritual aspiration, the sublimation of one’s nature
into the most subtle planes and the element of fire (AGNI TATTVA). The fire is
always oriented upwards, thus the correlation with the upward triangle – SHIVA
KONA. On the other hand, the downward pointing triangle signifies the element
of water which always tends to flown and occupy the lowest possible position.
This triangle is known as SHAKTI KONA.
The intersection of two geometric forms
(lines, triangles, circles, etc.) represents forces that are even more intense
than those generated by the simple forms. Such an interpenetration indicates a
high level in the dynamic interaction of the correspondent energies. The empty
spaces generated by such combinations are described as very efficient
operational fields of the forces emanating from the central point of the
YANTRA. That is why we can very often encounter representations of MANTRAS in
such spaces. YANTRA and MANTRA are complementary aspects of SHIVA and their use
together is much more efficient than the use of one alone.
The Six-Pointed Star (SHATKONA)‑Hexagon: A typical
combination often found in the graphical structure of a YANTRA is the
superposition of two triangles, one pointing upwards and the other downwards,
forming a star with six points (SHATKONA), also known as David’s Star. This
form symbolically represents the union of PURUSHA and PRAKRITI or SHIVA-SHAKTI,
without which there could be no Creation.
The Circle (CHAKRA): Another simple
geometrical shape often used in YANTRAS is the circle, representing the
rotation, a movement closely linked to the shape of spiral which is fundamental
in the Macrocosmic evolution. At the same time, the circle represents
perfection and the blissful creative void. In the series of the five
fundamental elements it represents air (VAYU TATTVA).
The Square (BHUPURA): Between the
simple geometrical elements that compose YANTRAS there is also the square
(BHUPURA). The square is usually the exterior limit of the YANTRA and
symbolically, it represents the element earth (PRITHIVI TATTVA).
Every YANTRA starts from the center, often
marked by a central dot (BINDU) and ends with the outer square. This represents
the sense of universal evolution, starting from the subtle and ending with the
coarse, starting from “ether” and ending with “earth”.
Even though most of the times YANTRAS are
composed of these simple geometrical shapes, sometimes we encounter other elements
such as arrow points, tridents, swords, spikes included in the design of a
YANTRA with the purpose of representing vectors and directions of action for
the YANTRIC energies.
The Lotus (PADMA): The lotus
symbol (or its petals) is both a symbol of purity and variety, every lotus
petal representing a distinct aspect. The inclusion of a lotus in a YANTRA
represents freedom from multiple interference with the exterior (purity) and
expresses the absolute force of the Supreme Self.
In conclusion, a YANTRA is a very complex
spiritual instrument in the tantric practice (SADHANA). It can calm
and focus the activities of the mind, and by its positive auto-suggestion it
has a beneficial impact on the health and psychic wellbeing of a person.
A YANTRA alone represents nothing. Only when
it is awakened by mental concentration and meditation will the process of
RESONANCE appear and the beneficial macrocosmic energies will manifest themselves
in the practitioner’s MICROCOSM.
How to Use YANTRAS : As we showed
above, the secret key to using YANTRAS in meditation is RESONANCE. The process
of RESONANCE is established by mental focus on the image of the YANTRA. As long
as the mind is tuned into the specific mood associated to that YANTRA, the
energy flows, but when the RESONANCE is stopped, the energy disappears.
For proper understanding of Swastika please go
through my discourse:
Swastika comes from the word Swasti
in Sanskrit which means auspiciousness. It represents omniscience of the
all-pervasive intelligence that prevails at the substratum of the entire
creation. The symbol Swastika
represents the symbol of Aum written
in Brahmalipi, one of the old scripts
of India.
VAIKHANASA DOCTRINE AND WORSHIP
Vaikhanasas claim to be a surviving school of
Vedic ritual, the Taittiriya Shakha of the Krishna Yajurveda. Vaikhanasa
tradition says the sage Vikhanasa, who was a manifestation of Lord Mahavishnu,
had the Upanayanam along with Brahma consecrated by His father Lord Mahavishnu
and educated under Lord Mahavishnu all the Vedas and Bhagawat Saastra on how to
worship Sri Bhagawaan in His Archaavathaara - Iconic Form. Sri Vikhanasa
Maharishi came down to earth's most holy place Naimisaaranyam composed the
Vaikhanasa Kalpasutra and taught Sri Vaikhanasa Bhagawat Saastra to his four
disciples viz., Atri, Bhrigu, Kashyapa and Marichi, respectively the procedures
of Samurtarcana, Amurtarchana, devotional service to Vishnu in images. Most
Vaikhanasa literature is almost completely concerned with rituals, prescribing
the rituals and their rules of performance. To the Vaikhanasas their temple
worship is a continuation of Vedic fire sacrifice. Regular and correct worship
of Vishnu in a temple will bring the same results as the fire sacrifice even
for people who do not maintain their fires.
Jnana or knowledge sections of Vaikhanasa
texts are short and it is necessary to infer their doctrines from discussions
in the texts on ritual. The Vaikhanasas evolved the theory of the five aspects
of Vishnu: Vishnu the all-pervading supreme deity;
Purusha, the principle of life; Sathya, the static aspect of deity; Achyuta,
the immutable aspect; and Aniruddha, the irreducible aspect. The distinction is
emphasized between Vishnu in his Niskala presence, the unfigured primeval and
indivisible form unperceived even by Brahma, and his Sakala presence, the
figured, divisible, emanated, and movable form. In his sakala presence he
responds gracefully to devotional meditation. Shri is important as nature,
Prakriti, and as the power, Shakti, of Vishnu.
The Vaikhanasa doctrine states that Moksha is
release into Vishnu's heaven. The nature of a man's Moksha is dependent on a
devotee's service of Japa--attentive
repetition of prayer; Huta--Yaaga,
sacrifice; Archana--service to
images; and Dhyana--Yogic
meditation. Of the four the Marichi Samhita says Archana is the realization of
all aims.
Temples and
images with the Vaikhanasas are of more importance than perhaps any other sect
of Hinduism. In accordance with Vaikhanasa doctrine of the two forms of Vishnu,
the Nishkala, the unmanifest and the Sakala, the manifest, two cult images are
distinguished. There is the large immovable image representing Vishnu's Niskala
form, which is ritually placed in a sanctuary and elaborately consecrated, and
a smaller movable image representing Vishnu's Sakala form. If the devotee
wishes for temporal and eternal results he should worship both forms. But if he
is after only eternal results he should worship the immovable image.
After self—purification (aachamana) and meditation (Dhyana) to
identify with Vishnu, the devotee surrenders to Vishnu and places the movable image
on a bathing pedestal and elaborately bathes it. This is preparation for
receiving the presence of God by immediate contact via a connecting string. The
invocation starts with a Mantra, sacred utterance, saying that the Imperishable
is linked to the Perishable and that the Self is released from all evil as it
knows God. Flowers are presented to all the deities present. Then the hymn
called the Aatmasukta is recited that identifies the body of the devotee with
the cosmos, followed by meditation on Vishnu's Niskala aspect: these parts of
the ritual are to request Vishnu to take his Sakala form in the movable image
(please refer to my discourse on Murthi Upasana) so that the devotee can
converse with Him. A Puja ceremony takes
place with God as the royal guest, (Kubewera presides—Rajadhirajaya perashya
saayine), followed by a Homa, offering into the fire [Homaagni], and a Bali
[offering of rice with ghee-but not animal sacrifice] with something that may
be visible, touchable, audible, or eatable. An offering of [Havis - anything
offered as an oblation with fire], cooked food, is important as the God's meal.
Afterwards the Prasaada (Food that was offered to God) is eaten by the
worshipers and devotees. The offering area is cleaned and a Bali of cooked rice
sprinkled with butter is offered to Vishnu. Then comes a Pradakshina
[circumambulation from left to right clockwise as a kind of worship] around the
temple. After Daksina, the officiating Brahman's share of the Prasadam, is
given, Vishnu is meditated upon as the personal manifestation of the sacrifice.
Finally Puspanjali [Mantra Pushpam], i.e., offering a handful of flowers at the
God's lotus feet after chanting the holy Mantraas, and the temple door is
closed after Mangala Haarathi.
Inspired by Tirumal Tirupati Devasthanam and
Parthasarathy Temple in Chennai and several other places in Karnatka and Andhra
Pradesh many temples
built overseas are followi Vaikahanas
agama. Vikhanas Theology focuses mostly on temple worship based on Veda mantras and Yajnas like Smarta
Tradition. In Tirupati
Vesdgoshthi is drawn from Smarta tradition though worship is by Vaikhanasa
Iyengars.
1.
Sri Venkateswara Temple, Tirumala
2.
India Cultural Center and Temple, Memphis,
Tennessee, USA
3.
Sri Venkateswara Swamy Temple, Ilupeju, Lagos,
Nigeria.
4.
Sri
Venkateswara swamy (Balaji) Temple of the Greater Chicago area
5.
Sri Lakshmi Temple, Ashland,
Boston USA
6.
Sri Srinivasa Perumal Temple of Singapore
7.
Hindu
Temple of Flower Mound, Flower Mound , Texas
PANCHARATRA
THEOLOGY
The Pancharatra theology developed over time
presents a dualistic theory on how creation manifested from a godhead, as the
Purusha-Prakriti and as the masculine-feminine manifestations of the divine.
It states that the creation emerged
through vyuhas (arrangements). In the beginning, states Pancharatra
doctrine, there was only Vasudeva- Krishna (Vishnu Narayana). Vasudeva literally means "indwelling
deity" as the highest changeless god. It arranged into Saṅkarṣaṇa
(Balarama) as the lord over all life, then Pradyumna creating mind, and
Aniruddha as ego (ahamkara). Thereafter, Brahma emerged from Aniruddha
who created the empirical universe. Thus, the divinity was and is everywhere in
Pancharatra, but in different aspects, one form or phase emerging from the
previous.
Ramanuja taught that the deity absolute
Parabrahman manifests in five possible aspects: Para, Vyuha, Vibhava,
Antaryamin and Archa. Living beings can interact with the
divine through one or another of these five:
- Para: the invisible, formless, eternal supreme;
- Vyuha: the invisible, impermanent supreme in form;
- Avatara: also called the vaibhava, are the incarnations of the supreme in various yuga (eons in Hindu cosmology) such as the Dasaavataara,
- Antaryamin: not directly perceptible but can be inferred, the aspect of supreme whose presence can be felt by the devotee;
- Archa: visible icon form, filled with symbolism, consecrated in temples or revered images inside home (Shalagrama, conch shell, festive decorations), a means to remember and meditate on the supreme.
He reformed
worship in almost all Vishnu temples in South India as well as some in the
North but still few temples like
Thirupati Venkatesvara Temple and
Parthasarathy Temple in Chennai follow Vaikhanasa tradition.
I believe Memphis temple in USA also follows Vaikhanasa tradition.
Pancharatra
theology has also influenced largely Gaudiya Vaishnavism. Vishnu-Narayana is
supreme, while Vasudeva, Samkarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are the four
Vyuhas. In Gaudiya Vaishnavism, the Vyuha theory is more complex, Krishna is
"Svayam Bhagavan" (the ultimate, Brahman) who manifests as Vyuhas,
and he along with Samkarsana, Pradyumna and Aniruddha are the Vyuhas and the
Purusha-avataras of the material realm.
The Pancharatra
tradition has taught Panchakala or five observances every day. The
first is called Abhigamna or ablutions and morning prayers to
god. This is followed by Upadana or collecting worship materials. The
third practice is Ijya or worship with offerings. The fourth practice in
the Pancharatra tradition has been daily study or Svadhyaya. The fifth
recommended practice is Yoga and meditation. Those who practice these five
observances are called Iyengars (Aindu
karangal). But now it claims the title by birth as a sub-sect of Brahmin
caste.
A MEDITATION
Egoistic existence needs to be negated. Say nāham (I
am not this little self, with attachments and aversion.
Exhale while saying nāham.
Remain the witness, the Pure Self. Say so’ham
(I am That, the sat-chit principle that is devoid of the ego).
Inhale while saying so’ham.
Do ‘regulated breathing’ to calm your mind,
with so’ham and nāham.
Negate the false, saying nāham.
Stay with the Truth, saying
so’ham. Say goodbye to asat (thought-created false I-sense). Welcome
sat (your real I).
asato mā sad gamaya. May we go from the
false to the true!
[Based on information
from Wikipedia and various other internet
sources with added text and explanation]
No comments:
Post a Comment