DID AVESTSA HEPTAHINDU (SAPTASINDHU) INSPIRE VASUDHAIVA
KUTUMBAKAM?
(Facebook
posting by N. R. Srinivasan, Nashville, TN. USA, August 2018)
I was born in Mysore then capital of
Mysore State as a citizen of British India in 1930. I moved to Madras
Presidency to continue my studies at the age of eight. After creditably passing
Intermediate in Madras Presidency I applied to Engineering colleges with my PCM
background. My application was not entertained as I was told that I do not
belong to Madras presidency as I was not born there though I studied there from
my primary school. I found that I did not belong to Mysore State also
since my delivery was at home and not registered. I was stateless
in India with no citizenship in Independent India.
The Justice party dominated Congress
supported by Periyar was in power in Madras Presidency after independence which
the Dravidian Movement swallowed later. Jinnah was quick in action,
separated himself from Justice Party and created PAK-I-STAN. Pak means Pure in
Persian while Stan is Sanskrit based; I -was inserted for continuity and
Pakistan was formed as a rival to Hindu-Stan, a precondition for
Independence. Probably Jinnah considered Hindus were not a pure lot and
left the minor religions in the Hindu fold though few had to be accepted on
regional basis whom they are progressively eliminating. Periyar-Anna-Karunandhi-Inspired-STAN
that can be labeled also as PAKISTAN would have been better received by the
North dominated Indian Government then, had only our Periyar followers were
active and not lazy. Rajaji also interfered and Periyar
followers got split into DK, DMK and ADMK. Poor
Periyar Group lost an opportunity to have their independence and to have the
appropriate name PAK-i-stan for Dravida Nadu that is
archeologically challenged, to commemorate the memories of Periyar, Anna
and Karunanidhi or PAK whom they could have deified in Atheism Religion
like Azhvars and Nayanmars, and even built Temples also like
Saibaba Temples in the so called Hinduism. You know Atheism enjoys
religious status in USA legally cleared.
I continued to be a Stateless person
according to the noble laws of the country as far as education and public
services were concerned but still had a passport that made me a citizen for
travel and emigration purposes that helped me to migrate to USA in 1981.
Within two years I got Green card and also after a year citizenship because of
my being an expert in my fields by UNIDO though not born or
educated in USA. Now all that I can claim is I am Tamil and US Citizen. Can I
claim to be Hindu or Indian, I doubt very much. Hindu is a name to identify the
land you hail from and cannot identify your following or belief. I certainly
can claim I follow Sanatana Dharma or Eternal Tradition wherever I am.
Now India has introduced the Aadhaar Card which clears all ambiguities and
twisting rules for convenience to condemn a person. An Aadhaar card is a
unique number issued to every citizen in India and is a centralized and
universal identification number. That is why I say Hindu migrants should forget
their identity with India with no Adhar card and say they follow Sanatana
Dharma with loyalty to Vedas and not Hinduism of India. Is it still linked to
caste? I think so as there is backward class reservation for almost 65%
of castes and minority religions. I also believe you lose Aadhaar card once you
migrate?
Why I can’t be called a Hindu and also
my religion Hinduism? The word Hindu is well recorded in Avesta which
talks about Haptahidhuva region that nobody can question being third
party holding sealed particulars. They may question anything in Vedas and
say it is all later insertion like modern mantra which sanctifies seven rivers—
Yamuna, Ganga, Godavari, Sarasvati, Narmada, Sindhu, and Cauvery
which clearly says Hindus are from the land of Saptasindhu. But Vedas do
not mention Narmada, and Cauvery and Godavari therefore it must be later
insertion. Periyar Group have a valid point for argument here as champions of
Dravidian cause eliminating Brahmins.
Sindhu and Saraswati were most sacred
rivers of that era. The hymns in praise of Saraswati are some of
the oldest composed 8000 years ago. As per this evidence Sapta Sindhu region
comprised of river Saraswati, Indus and five tributaries of Indus viz. Sutudri
(Sutlej), Parusni (Ravi), Asikni (Chenab), Vitasta (Jhelum) and Vipas (Beas)
river. The Sapta Saindhavas country of the Rig Vedic period was bounded
by the Himalayas and modern Tibet in the east, Turkistan in the north,
Afghanistan, in the west and the Aravallis in the South. British liquidated
most of this region by donating it out of India or Bharat.
Sapta-Sindhu meaning 7 rivers is the term which gave birth to the word “Hindu”. Sapta-Sindhu was referred to as Hapta-Hindu by Persians etc. The people of this region and culture, the Sapta-Saindhavas were referred to as hapta-Haindavas by Persians etc. The term is found in Avesta of Zoroastrians.
The seven Indus Rivers, Hapta Hindu
(nation #15 above), are: 1. the Indus (Veda-Sindhu), the 2. Kabul and 3. Kurram
rivers joining on the west and north banks of the Indus, and the 4. Jhelum
(Veda-Vitasta), 5. Chenab (Veda-Asikni), 6. Ravi (Veda-Airovati), and 7.
Sutlej/Beas (Veda-Vipasa) rivers joining the Indus' east and south banks.
(There is some discussion that the Saraswati River mentioned in Hindu Vedic
texts was also an Indus tributary - though this is not clear.) The Hindu texts
are mainly concerned with the eastern & southern tributaries while the
Zoroastrian texts are concerned with the upper reaches of the Indus and all its
tributaries whose valleys would have provided access to the plains.
We do not find reference to Brahmaputra
in Vedas or Avesta. At the time of partition they should have only agreed
to give the land of Bangladesh to Jinnah to form their Pakistan and
not Sindhu valley that is West Pakistan and also fixed a time limit for all
those who do not sign their loyalty to Sanatana Dharma and Satyemeva
jayate to move to present Bangladesh or any Islamic country of
their choice and acceptance or move to England. They should have thought of an
Aadhaar Card then! Congress missed the opportunity.
So our Periyar followers claim they are
not with Aryans and claim Dravida Nadu thrived beyond Aravalli even
before the people of Saptahaindava region and the Vedas. Andhra, Chera and
Pandya regions are mentioned in Valmiki Ramayana as part of ancient India but not
Kerala that might have been part of Pandya.
I draw inspiration from Ramayana to
claim I follow the Dharma which Rama protected endorsed by Kambar, and not the
new Periyar PAK Religion of Atheists, with the freedom to practice Dharma as an
American Citizen.
The
Sanskrit word drāviḍa is used to denote the geographical region of
South India. It was coined by Adi Sankaracharya (590—477 BCE) when he was
questioned as to where he had come from by locals in Mandhata to which he
proclaimed himself to be a "Drāviḍa Śiśu," with shishu
meaning 'child' or 'child of' and dravida being a sandhi word combining
the elements dravya, meaning water, and vida, meaning meeting
place. Therefore, drāviḍa means "the place where the three
waters meet" with those "three waters" being the Indian Ocean,
Arabian Sea and Bay of Bengal. May be they had some other name then for these
seasz? Southern Brahmins are known as Pancha Dravida while Northern
Brahmins are known as Panch Gauda, denoting geographical region. At the time
Sankara lived on this earth the word Hindu or Hinduism did not exist and he
was therefore declared himself as DRAVIDA BRAHMANA who postulated
Advaita Philosophy of Sanatana Dharma. He refrained from both the words Arya
and Hindu.
The Nadistuti sukta of Rig-Veda mentioned ten rivers viz. Ganga, Yamuna, Saraswati, Sutudri, Parusni, Asikni, Marudvrdha, Vitasta, Arjikiya and Susoma. The Shutudri is old name of Sutlej, Parushni of Ravi, Asikni of Chenab and Vitasta of Jhelum. Apart from these 10 rivers, the Kubha River (Kabul), Suwastu (Swat) Kramu (Kurram) & Gomati (Gomal) Rivers have also got place in Rig-Vedic texts. Thus, any of these might be the seven rivers of Sapta Sindhava region.
The Nadistuti sukta of Rig-Veda mentioned ten rivers viz. Ganga, Yamuna, Saraswati, Sutudri, Parusni, Asikni, Marudvrdha, Vitasta, Arjikiya and Susoma. The Shutudri is old name of Sutlej, Parushni of Ravi, Asikni of Chenab and Vitasta of Jhelum. Apart from these 10 rivers, the Kubha River (Kabul), Suwastu (Swat) Kramu (Kurram) & Gomati (Gomal) Rivers have also got place in Rig-Vedic texts. Thus, any of these might be the seven rivers of Sapta Sindhava region.
Jinnah wanted the name Pakistan
to mean Pure-land to his new found land for Islams so as to
cleanse the land by killing or converting those who do not believe in Islam
later. Similarly Congress wanted to keep the name Hindustan to have
legal claim over the land that they gave away forced by circumstances.
Now it is time for present Indians to correct the mistake and get back the
rightful land as the historic and geographic name Hindu suggests. Then
they can switch over to Sanatan Dharma. But what prevents Hindu Americans to
switch over to Sanatana Dharma acceptable to all Hindu migrants from various
lands right now? Hinduism as practiced today is not the broad-based Universal
Dharmic way of life vedic culture followed. Muslims are occupants of land of
Hindus while Hindus have not occupied anybody’s land. Hindus also do not
have a claim over Bangladesh though they speak Bangla like Hindus. So what!
Many countries speak English.
It will be therefore wiser to focus on
Sanatana Dharma, spiritually progress and help the so called SBNR and the new
families of mixed race of Hindu and Abrahamic religions or atheists than worry
about what is going on India and with Hindus in India like Aryan
Dravidian fight, Brahmin hatred, Christian conversion, Hindu killing by
Taliban and so on about which we hear so much from our social reformers,
leaders, religious leaders and spiritual Gurus in USA who always
think all American Hindus are of Indian origin only. We need to focus on
our children and preservation of Vedic Heritage in USA with 400 Hindu
temples and several monasteries and spiritual Gurus! Charity begins at home.
"The beauty of Hindu Dharma is that it is not a man-made historical religion, dependent upon church, savior or prophet or preaching any belief or dogma. Hindu Dharma rises from the Earth and Nature, from our Inner Being and allows us to embrace the entire universe within us" --Padma Bhushan Dr. David Frawley.
"The beauty of Hindu Dharma is that it is not a man-made historical religion, dependent upon church, savior or prophet or preaching any belief or dogma. Hindu Dharma rises from the Earth and Nature, from our Inner Being and allows us to embrace the entire universe within us" --Padma Bhushan Dr. David Frawley.
No comments:
Post a Comment