Saturday, April 28, 2012

PHILOSOPHY SCHOOLS OF HINDUISM


PHILOSOPHY SCHOOLS OF HINDUISM
(I-DISCOURSE BY N. R. SRINIVASAN, CONSOLIDATED 2012)

 
The etymological meaning of the word 'Philosophy' is love of learning or pursuit of wisdom. It is a search for a general understanding of values and reality by chiefly speculative rather than observational means. It signifies a natural and necessary urge in human beings to know themselves and the world in which they live and move and have their being. Western philosophy remained more or less true to the etymological meaning of 'philosophy' in being essentially an intellectual quest for truth. Hindu philosophy however intensely spiritual and has always emphasized the need for practical realization of Truth. The origin of Hindu Philosophy may be easily traced to the Vedas. Unfortunately our knowledge of Vedic period is, even to this day, too meager and imperfect. The Upanishads are known as "Vedanta" or the end of the Veda not only because they are the concluding portion, the end, of Veda but also because they are the essence, the cream, the height of the Vedic philosophy.

 
All systems of Indian philosophy are ranged by the Hindus in two categories; Aastika systems, which affirm and Nastika systems which deny—'asti' means it is and 'nasti' means it is not. Chaarvaaka, Buddhist and the Jains systems were called Nastika, heterodox and nihilist, not because they questioned or denied the existence of God (which they did), but because they questioned, denied or ignored the authority of the Vedas. Some of the orthodox systems also doubted or denied God; they were nevertheless called orthodox because they accepted the infallibility of the scriptures and the institution of Varnashrama dharma, and no hindrance was placed against the free thought, however atheistic, of those schools that acknowledged these fundamentals of orthodox Hindu society. Since wide latitude was allowed in interpreting the holy books, the clever dialecticians could find in the Vedas any doctrine which they sought, the only practical requirement for intellectual respectability was the recognition of Varnashrama dharma; this being the real Government of India. Rejection of it was treason, and acceptance of it covered multitude of sins. In effect therefore, the philosophers in India enjoyed far more their liberty than their scholastic analogues in Europe, though less, perhaps, than the thinkers of Christendom under the enlightened Popes of Renaissance.

 
The purpose of knowledge and philosophy is not control of the world so much as release from it; and that the goal of thought is to find freedom from the suffering of frustrated desire by achieving freedom from desire itself. These are the philosophies to which men come when they are tired of ambition, struggle, wealth, progress and success.

 
The Aaranyaka portions of the Vedas are composed in the calmness of the forests. They mark the transition from the ritualistic to the philosophic thought. We find here a mystic interpretation of the Vedic sacrifices enumerated in the Samhita and Braahmana portions of the Vedas. The concluding portions of the Aaranyakas are called the Upanishads. These are intensely philosophical and spiritual and may be rightly regarded as the crème of Vedic Philosophy.

 
The Upanishads are rightly regarded as the fountain head of all Hindu Philosophy. Jnaana yoga and Karma yoga form the basis. Except for Chaarwaaka philosophy of Materialism and the Philosophy of Buddhism all schools have Vedas as their basis and are based on the theory of reincarnation. Literature on Upanishadic period philosophy is called Darsana and is in the form of Sutras. Popular Philosophy Schools of Hinduism can be classified under six groups:
  • Philosophy schools of Upanishadic period called Darshanas; 1) Sankhya Darshana of Kapila. 2) Yoga Darshana of Patanjali. 3) Vaisheshika Darshana of Kanada. 4) Nyaaya Darshana of Goutama. 5) Poorva Meemaamsa of Jaimini. 6) Uttara Meemaamsa of Baadaraayana (Vyaasa) also known as Vedanta or Brahmasootras

     
  • Philosophy Schools of post-Upanishadic period; 1) Advaita philosophy of Sankaracharya. 2) Vishishtaadvaita of Ramanujaharya. 3) Dvaita philosophjy of Madhvacharya.
    Non-vedic Philosophy Schools;1) Chaarwaaka philosophy or Materialsm known as Naastika vaada. 2) Philosophy Schools of Buddhism—Soonyavaada

     
  • Vaishnava Schools of Bhakti: 1) Nimbalkar School of Dvaitaadvaita. 2) Vallbha School of Shuddha Advaita. 3) Chaitanya School of Achityabhedabhaava

     
  • Saiva Philosophy Schools; 1) Saiva Siddhaanta schools. 2) Kaashmeera Saivism Schools.

 


 
  • Sakta Philosophy Schools.

 

 
Philosophy Schools of Upanishadic period—DARSANAS

 
The word, 'darsana' means vision and also the 'instrument of vision'. They stand for the direct, immediate and intuitive vision of Reality, the actual perception of Truth and also include the means which lead to their realization.

 
Darsanas are schools of philosophy or theology based on Sruti. Each school tries to systematize, correlate and develop the teachings of the various parts of the Vedas. Here the appeal is to the logical
under-standing. Each Darsana consists of a number of Sutras or Aphorisms by the founder in which he gives his theory. To these are attached an authoritative commentary at a later stage. It is the Vedanta alone that now holds the field as the most satisfactory system of philosophy that could be evolved out of the Upanishads.

 
1. SAANKHYA DARSANA

 
It is the most ancient philosophical system in the world. This was founded by sage Kapila. He was the divine son of Devahuti who was the daughter of the first Manu (Swayambhuva). Sankhya derives from Shwetaavataara Upanishad the doctrine of Prakriti, the three theories of gunas from Chandogyopanishad, the doctrine of Purusha, the relation of mind, soul and intellect from Kathopanishad, the doctrine of Linga-sareera from Prasnopanishad.

 
This system recognizes no personal God. It sees the universe with the forces of Purusha and Prakriti. The word 'Saankhya' is derived from the word 'Sankhya' means right knowledge as well as number. Gita uses this word in the sense of knowledge, so also Mahaabhaarata. 'Saankhya' means the philosophy of right knowledge (samyak khyaati iti) or Jnaana. Right knowledge is the knowledge of separation of Purusha from the Prakriti. There are some striking similarities between Saankhya and Gita.

 
Sankaracharya says, that in Gita, 'Saankhya' means knowledge and 'yoga' means action. Yoga as the counterpart of Saankhya, means action or practice and tells us how the theoretical metaphysical teachings of Saankhya might be realized in actual practice. Saankhya is also the philosophy of numbers, because it deals with twenty-five categories explained below. As a philosophy of numbers, it might have influenced the Pythgorean philosophy. Saankhya maintains a clear-cut dualism between Purusha and Prakriti and further maintains the plurality of the Purusha, and is silent on God. It is a pluralistic spiritualism and an atheistic realism and an uncompromising dualism. The original cosmic power Prakriti(1), becomes alive and is called Mahat (2), that produces absolutely subtle forms of ego called Ahankaara(3), and Manas(4). Then it evolves into 20 extremely subtle basic forms of creation in various phases of its subtle manifestation called Pancha Tanmaatras, Pancha Jnaanendriyas (sensory organs), Pancha Karmendriyas (motor organs) and Pancha Mahaabhootas(five elements). These are the 24 forms of subtle manifestations of Maaya that evolve and become the Universe where Purusha (25) is omnipresent. Everything works to serve the purpose of the Purusha. Carefully understanding the 24 aspects of Prakriti and the Purusha, then attaching his mind to Purusha and then detaching his mind from the entire creation of Prakriti, soul releases the bondage of the world of Maaya. Through the constant practice of yogic meditation gradually the mind may release its attachments from the worldly objects. Saankhya does not give any detail of the practice of meditation. The practical side of Saankhya meditation is in the Yoga Darsana.

 

 
2. YOGA DARSANA

 
Yoga is the word derived from the root word 'yuj' meaning 'to yoke' or 'to join'. It literally means spiritual union of the individual souls with the universal soul. Yogadarsana resembles Saankhya Darsana. Its ideas are based on dualism, (seeing the universe as two—subject and object) and it does not talk about God mostly. To some extent it talks about God as an inanimate object with the word 'It'. Yogadarsana has its roots in Shvetaaavataara Upanishad.

 
Pataanjali is the traditional founder of the Yoga system. According to him, Yoga does not mean union but spiritual effort to attain perfection through the control of the body, senses and mind, and through the discrimination between Purusha ands Prakriti. Yoga is intimately allied to Saankhya. Yoga means spiritual action and Saankhya means knowledge. Saankhya is theory and Yoga is practice.

 
Yogasaastra is divided into four parts. The first is called Samaadhi Paada which deals with the nature and aim of concentration. The second--Saadhana Paada explains the means to realize the end. The third, Vibhuti Paada deals with the supra-natural powers which can be acquired through Yoga. The fourth--Kaivalya Paada describers the nature of liberation and the reality of transcendental Self.

 
A sound mind needs a sound body. Sensual attachments and passions distract the body as well as mind. They must be conquered. To overcome them, Yoga gives Eightfold path of Discipline called Ashtaanga Yoga:

 
1) Yama—it is ostentation from injury through thought, word or deed (ahimsa), from falsehood (asatya), from stealing (aasteya), from passion and lust (brahmacharya) and form avarice (aparigraha).

 
2) Niyama—it is self culture and includes external and internal purification (shaucha), austerity (tapas), study (svadhyaaya) and devotion to God (Ishvara Pranidhaana).

 
3) Aasana—it means steady and comfortable posture. There are various kinds of postures which are a physical help to meditation.
4) Praanaayaama—it means control of breath and deals with regulation of inhalation, retention and exhalation of breath. It is highly beneficial to health and is highly conducive to the concentration of the mind. But it must be performed under expert guidance, otherwise may have bad after effects.

 
5) Pratyaahaara—it is the control of the senses, in withdrawing the senses from their objects. Our senses have a natural tendency to go to outward objects. They must be checked and directed towards the internal goal. It is the process of introversion.
The above five are called external aids to Yoga (Bahiranga Saadhana).

 
    6) Dhaarana—it is fixing the mind on the object of mediation like the tip of the nose or the midpoint of the eye-brows or the lotus of the heart or the image of the deity. The mind must be steadfast like the non-flickering flame or lamp.

 
7) Dhyaana—it means meditation and consists in the undisturbed flow of thought round the object of meditation. It is the steadfast contemplation without any break.

 
8) Samaadhi—it means concentration. This is the final step in Yoga. Here the mind is completely absorbed in the object of meditation. In Dhyaana the act of meditation and the object of meditation remain separate. But here they become one. It is the highest means to realize the concentration of mental modifications which is the end. It is the ecstatic state in which the connection with the external world is
broken and through which one has to pass before obtaining liberation. There are many stages of Samaadhi which relate to the saatvic development of the mind of a yogi, and it takes lifetime to fully perfect the state of Samaadhi.

 
Yoga generates certain supra normal psychic powers. But they should be avoided and attention should be fixed only on liberation which is the end of human life. The ideal is Kaivalya, the absolute independence and eternal and free life of the Purusha, free from Prakriti.

 
(For more details refer to the discourse on Ashtaangayoga of Patanjali on the Blog: <nrsrini.blogspot.com>)

 
3. VAISHESHIKA DARSANA

 
This is the atomic school of Hinduism. The word is derived from 'visesha' which means 'particularly' or 'distinguishing feature' or 'distinction'.

 
The founder of this system is Kaanada who is also known as a Kanabhuk, Ulooka or Kaashyapa. He was called Kaanada because he used to live as an ascetic on the grains picked up from fields. 'Kana' also means a particle or particular and the words Kaanada suggests one who lives on the philosophy of particularity—Vishesha. It teaches that he Universe is made of nine elements described below. There is no mention of God in this system. God is mentioned simply as 'That'.

 
The Vaisheshika Philosophy is a pluralistic realism, which emphasizes that diversity is the soul of universe. Substances or Dravya is defined as the substratum of qualities and actions. Substance is the basis of qualities and actions, actual or potential, present or future. Ultimate substances are eternal, independent and individual and are either infinite or infinitesimal. All compound substances which are made up of parts and arise out of the simple ultimate substances are necessarily transient and impermanent and subject to production and destruction. The nine substances are: 1) earth (prithvi); 2) water (aapaha); 3) fire (agni); 4) air (vaayu); 5) ether (aakaasha); 6) time (kaala); 7) space(dik); 8) spirit (aatman); 9) mind or the internal organ (manas). All of them are objective realities. Earth, water, fire, air and ether are the five
gross elements. The first four produce composite things. Earth, water, fire, air and manas are atomic and eternal. Manas(mind) is also regarded as a substance. It is the internal sense (antar indriya) but unlike the other four atomic substances, it does not give rise to compound objects. Manas is a substance, it is atomic and part less and can come into contact with one sense only at a time. Five gross elements and manas are physical. Soul is spiritual. Time and space are objective and not subjective forms of experience. Ether, space, time and soul are all-pervading and eternal. Atoms, minds and souls are infinite in number. Ether, space and time are one each.

 
Vaiseshika introduces the science of logical thinking of right and wrong and also tells us that the creation started from the subtle physical particles (paramaanu). God is not the creator of the universe. Innumerable atoms and innumerable souls are co-eternal and co-present with Him to limit Him. He has been reduced the status of a supervisor. His hands and feet are chained by shackles of the Law of Karma. He has simply to pass on motion from the unseen Power to the atoms and to withdraw it when the time for dissolution comes. The liberated souls themselves do not merge in God, not even share his Knowledge and Bliss, do not experience anything common with Him. Bhakti has no place in this system, since God is powerless to help or harm. It is the Unseen Power which is the real efficient Cause. This Unseen Power being unintelligent requires the guidance of an intelligent person, 'That'. The soul is treated just like an object. The Vaiseshika conception of liberation as the real state of the soul free from all qualities reduces the soul to a mere nothing. To regard the soul as a substance is ultimately to explode it. The soul is nothing if it is not a subject and if consciousness is not its essence. Sankara therefore calls the system, the 'semi destroyer' and the Heenayaana Buddhism as 'full destroyer'. Sriharsha condemns it as 'ulooka darsana'—owlish philosophy. Nevertheless, this system indicates that God should be desired unlike Charwaaka philosophy of materialism.

 

 
4. NYAAYA DARSANA

 
Sage Goutama is the founder of Nyaaya School. He is also known as Gautama and Akshapaada. Nyaaya means argumentation and suggests that the system is predominantly intellectual, analytical, logical and epistemological.

 
This system is primarily concerned with the logical analysis of the world and its atheistic nature. It resembles the Vaisheshika system. It is a logical quest for God, the absolute Divinity. It tells the material power Maaya, with the help of God, becomes the Universe. It is also called "Tarkashaastra" or the science of reasoning or the science of logic (pramaana shaastra); the science of causes (Hetuvidya) or the science of critical study (anveekshiki).

 
The Nyaaya-Vaieshika schools put forth the atomic theory of matter, the permutation and combination of atomic particles which ultimately lead to the whole creation.

 
Nyaaya is a system of atomistic pluralism and logical realism. Nyaaya develops logic and epistemology. It agrees like Vaiseshika, that the earthly life is full of suffering, as bondage of the soul and in regarding
Liberation, which is absolute cessation of suffering, as the supreme end of life. Bondage is due to the
Ignorance of Reality and that liberation is due to right knowledge of reality as in Vaiseshika system. Nyaaya takes up the exposition of Reality. Nyaaya recognizes sixteen categories, differing from Vaisheshika which recognizes seven categories, The Nyaaya theism is a step forward from Vaiseshika system:

 
1) The world is an effect and hence it must have an efficient cause.     This intelligent agent is God.

 
2) The atoms being essentially inactive cannot form the different combinations unless given motion to them.

 
3) The world is sustained by God's will. Unintelligent Power cannot do this. And the world is destroyed by God's will.

 
4) The word has a meaning and signifies object. The power of word to signify their objects comes from God.

 
5) God is the author of the infallible Veda.

 
6) The Veda testifies the existence of God.

 
7) The Vedic sentences deal with moral injections and prohibitions. The Vedic commands are the Divine Commands. God is the creator and promulgator of the moral laws.

 
8) At the time of creation souls are unconscious; and the atom, the unseen power, space, time, mind are all unconscious. Hence the numerical conception depends on the Divine consciousness. The magnitude of the dyad is not produced by the infinitesimal magnitude of the two atoms each, but by the number of two atoms. Number one is directly perceived but the other numbers are conceptual creations. Numerical conception is related to the mind of the perceiver.

 
9) We reap the fruit of our own actions. Merit and demerit accrue from our actions and the stock of merit and demerit is the Unseen Power. But this Unseen Power being unintelligent needs the guidance of a supremely intelligent God.

 
But yet, all criticisms leveled against Vaisheshika also hold grounds for Nyaaya system also.

 

 
5. MEEMAAMSA (POORVA)

 
Meemaamsa literally means 'revered thought' and was originally applied to the interpretation of the vedic rituals which commanded highest reverence. The word is now used in the sense of any critical investigation. Meemaamsa and Vedanta are treated as allied systems of thought. Both are based on and both try to interpret Veda. Meemaamsa deals with the earlier portion of the Veda, i.e., the Mantra and the Braahmna portion called Karma khaanda, therefore called Poorva Meemaamsa and deals with Dharma. The Meemaamsa system is based on the avoidance of rebirth. Poorva Meemaamsa takes up Karmayoga.
The actual founder of this system is Sage Jaimini who was the disciple of Sage Vedavyaasa. The leading exponents of this system are Kumareela and Prabhaakara. Jaimini wrote the book Meemaamsa Sutra which is the most important authority in the system.

 
Poorva Meemaamsa regards Veda as eternal and authoritative and of infallible authority. Greatest importance is attached to the Braahmana portion of the Veda to which both the Mantras and Upanishads are subordinated. It is essentially a book of rituals dealing with commandments prescribing injunctions and prohibitions. The aim of the Meemaamsa is to supply the principles according to which the Vedic texts are to be interpreted and to provide philosophical justification for views contained therein. The work of finding the principles for the right interpretation of the Vedic texts was undertaken by the Brahmanas themselves and mainly by the Shrauta Shastras. Meemaamsa continued this work. It is not just a commentary on Vedic rituals. The main thing which entitles it to the rank of philosophical system is its keen desire to replace the philosophical justification for the Vedic views and to replace the earlier ideal of the attainment of heaven (Swarga) by the ideal of Liberation (apavarga). It undertakes a thorough investigation into the nature and validity of knowledge and into the various means which produce valid knowledge, also into other metaphysical problems. Curious as though, it may seem, the Meemaamsa has been influenced by the Nyaaya—Vais eshika Schools, many important doctrines of which it has either borrowed or rejected.

 
In the beginning of the book, Jaimini defines the quality and character of the text of Vedas and tells that the words and descriptions of the Vedas are eternal, divine and complete in themselves. They are not created by God or any saint. They eternally reside in God as divine power and are produced on earth planet through sages who conceived them in divine mind. So they are called mantra drishtas (the conceivers of the mantras in the vividness of divine ecstasy). Poorva Meemaamsa says that not only Vedas but their language is also eternal, otherwise Vedas could not have been produced. Then it explains correct application of mantras, how they should be used and in what context. There are certain places in the Vedas where the exact meaning of the verses is somewhat debatable as the Vedic words have different connotations at different places. Poorva Meemaamsa clarifies such a situation and gives a definite answer to it. Poorva Meemaamsa does not relate to God realization, its subject matter is the attainment of celestial luxuries only.


 
6. VEDANTA SYSTEM (UTTARA MEEMAAMSA)

 
This system deals with the latter portion of Veda and is therefore called Uttara Meemaamsa and also Jnaana Meemaamsa. Meemaamsa and Vedanta form a single system according to some. The Sutras beginning with first Sutra of Jaimini in Poorva Meemaamsa and ending with the last Sutra of Baadaraayana in Uttara Meemaamsa form one compact Shaastra. Karma (action) and Upaasana (meditation) were absolutely essential to hasten the dawn of true knowledge according to them.

 
The Vedanta system was founded by Sage Baadaraayana (Vedavyaasa) who wrote the book called Vedantasutra or Brahmasutra. Vedanta means end of the Vedas indicating that this was written based on Upanishads which came after Vedas. Vedanta takes up Jnaanayoga.

 
The central doctrine of Vedanta is that God (Brahman) and the individual soul (atman) are one and the same. According to this system, nothing exists except Brahman. The human problem is not sin but ignorance. The ignorance of the true nature of oneself results in the endless cycle of births and rebirths. Advaita, Visishtaadvaita and Dvaita are the three important branches that emerged from the Vedaanta- system of Baadaraayana.

 

 
Philosophy of Naastikavaada—Materialism

 
Its founder was Chaarvaaka. The most important book of this system was Brihaspatisutra. This book is not available but we have quotations from the same written by other authors to refute Chaarvaaka's philosophy. It is known as Naastikavaada in Hinduism because this philosophy is independent of Vedic ideas and principles. It rejected the existence of God and considers religion as an aberration.

 
Brihaspati, a heretical teacher, is regarded as the traditional founder of this school. Unfortunately, his Sutras have perished. Sometimes, Brihaspati is equated with the teacher of Gods who propagated
Materialism among the Asuras so that they may be ruined. Chaarvaaka is said to be the chief disciple of Brihaspati.

 
Some of the important Sutras of Brihaspati which are quoted in various philosophical writings may be gleaned as follows:
  1. Earth, water, fire and air are the four elements. Ether is not an element because it is not perceived but inferred.
  2. Bodies, senses and objects are the results of the different combinations of elements.
  3. Consciousness arises from matter like the intoxicating quality of wine arising from fermented yeast. It is a particular combination of the elements which obtains only in the human body that produces consciousness and that therefore only living human body and consciousness are always associated together and nobody has seen consciousness apart from the human body.
  4. The soul is nothing but the conscious body.
  5. Matter secretes mind as lever secretes bile.
  6. God is not necessary for the World and the values are a foolish aberration.
  7. Enjoyment is the only end of human life.
8) Death alone is Liberation.

 
The Sarva-darsana Sangraha of Madhvacharya (Chapter 1) gives the following summary of the Chaarvaaka Philosophy:

 
"There is no heaven, no final liberation, nor any soul in another world; nor do the actions of four castes, orders etc produce any real effect. The Agnihotra, three Vedas, the ascetics, three staves and smearing oneself with ashes, were made by Nature as the livelihood of these destitutes of knowledge and manliness. If a beast is slain in Jyotishtoma rite, will it go to heaven? why then does not the sacrificer forthwith offer his own father?...If beings in heaven are glorified by our offering the shraaddha here, then why not give the food down below to those who are standing on the house top? While life remains, let a man live happily, let him feed on ghee even though he runs on debt; when once the body becomes ashes, how can it ever return here?....all the ceremonies are a means of livelihood for Brahmins. The three authors of the Vedas were buffoons, knaves and demons"

 
Materialism must have arisen as a protest against the excessive monkdom of the Brahmin priests. The external ritualism which ignored the substance and emphasized the shadow, the idealism of the Upanishads unsuited to the commoners, the political and the social crisis rampant in that age, the exploitation of the masses by petty rulers, monks and wealthy class, the lust and greed and petty dissensions in an unstable society paved the way for Materialism in India in the post-Upanishadic and Pre-
Buddhism age. But the Materialism in Indian philosophy has never been a force. Born in discontents it soon died in serious thoughts. Though the materialistic way of life, the way of enjoying the pleasures of the senses and the flesh is as old as humanity itself and will surely last as long as humanity lasts, yet Materialism as metaphysics has never found favor with Indian Philosophers. Jainism and Buddhism arose immediately and supplied the ethical and spiritual background which ejected Materialism. We do not have with us the original Sutras of Brihaspati and therefore we have to be content with the comments of the critics of this philosophy which presents a very negative picture.

 

 
Shoonyavaada of Buddhism

 
Siddharta later known as Gautama Buddha was born to Maayadevi and Shuddhodhana, the queen and king of Saankhya Dynasty of Kapilavastu. The philosophy based on his teachings is popularly known as Soonyavaada by Hindu philosophers. Gautama Buddha was accommodated as an avataara of Lord Vishnu in Hinduism. The teachings of Buddha were oral and were recorded much later. He repeatedly told his disciples: 'Two things only, my disciples, do I teach—misery and cessation of misery.'

 
Teachings of Buddha may be said to be three-fold—the four Noble     Truths, the Noble Eight-fold Path and the Doctrine of Dependent Origination.

 
The four Noble Truths (aarya satya) are:
  1. There is suffering: Life is full of misery and pain. Even the so called pleasures are really fraught with pain. There is always fear lest we may lose the so-called pleasures and their loss involves pain. Indulgence also results in pain. That there is suffering in this world is a fact of common experience. Poverty, disease, old age, death, selfishness, meanness, greed, anger, hatred, quarrels, bickering, conflicts, exploitation are rampant in this world. That life is full of suffering none can deny.

 
  1. There is a cause of suffering: Everything has a cause. Nothing comes out of nothing. The existence of every event depends upon its causes and conditions. Everything in this world is conditional, relative and limited. Suffering being a fact, it must be a cause. It must depend on some condition. 'This being, that arises', 'the cause being present, the effect arises', is the casual law of Dependent Origination.

     
  2. There is a cessation of suffering: Because everything arises depending on some causes and conditions, therefore if these causes and conditions are removed the effect must also cease. Everything being conditional and relative is necessarily momentary and what is momentary must perish. That which is born must die. Production implies destruction.

     
  3. There is a way leading to this cessation of suffering: There is an ethical and spiritual path by following which misery may be removed and liberation attained. This is the Noble Eight-fold Path.

 
The Noble Eight-fold Path consists of eight steps which are: 1) Right faith, 2) right resolve, 3) right speech, 4) right action, 5) right living, 6) right effort, 7) right thought and 8) right concentration. This is open to the clergy and the laity alike.

 
In the old books we also find mention of a triple path consisting of Seela or right conduct, Samaadhi or right concentration and Praajna or right knowledge. Seela and Samaadhi lead to Praajna which is the direct cause of liberation. They roughly correspond to Darsana, Jnaana and Chaaritra of Jainism.

 
Buddha's ethical middle path is the golden mean of Aristotle. Self-indulgence and self-mortification are equally ruled out. In his very first sermon in Saaranaath, he said: "There are two extremes, O monks, from which he who leads a religious life must abstain. One is a life of pleasure devoted to desire and enjoyment: that is base, ignoble, unspiritual, unworthy and unreal. The other is a life of mortification: it is
gloomy, unworthy, unreal. The Perfect one, O Monks, is removed from both these extremes and has discovered the way which lies between them, the middle way which enlighten the eyes, enlightens the mind, which leads rest, to knowledge, to enlightenment, to Nirvana.

 
Soonyavaada is one of the most important schools of Buddhism. Naagarjuna alone is the first systematic expounder of Soonyavaada. Soonyavaada existed even before him, in the Mahaayaana Sutras. The heterodox Buddhism derives its idealism, monism, absolutism, the theory of Karma, the distinction between empirical and the absolute stand-points, and the theory of Ignorance is the root-cause of this cycle of birth and death and that Nirvaana can be attained by right knowledge alone, from the Upanishads.

 
Buddhism and Vedanta should not be viewed as two opposed systems but only as different stages in the development of the same central thought which starts with the Upanishads. So far as the similarities between Buddhism and Vedanta are concerned they are so many and so strong that by no stretch of imagination they can be denied or explained otherwise. However there are some differences which are real and vital.

 
Soonyavaadins call themselves as Maadhyamikas or the followers of middle path realized by Buddha during Enlightenment, which path, avoiding the errors of existence and non-existence, affirmation and negation, eternalism and nihalism (naastik), also at once transcends both the extremes. Soonya essentially means indescribable (avaachya) as it is beyond the four categories of intellect. The world is indescribable because it is neither existent nor non-existent; the Absolute is indescribable because it is transcendental and no category of intellect can adequately describe it.

 
Those who maintain that that the world exists are committing a great error because when we penetrate deep we find that this entire world with all its manifold phenomena is essentially relative and therefore ultimately unreal. And those who advocate non-existence or non-being are also committing a great error because they are denying even the phenomenal reality of the world. Eternalism and Nihalism are both false. Reality is to be realized through spiritual experience. Unfortunately the word "soonya" has been gravely misunderstood as "nothing" or "an empty void" or "a negative abyss". Ignorance is of two kinds: Ignorance due to suffering and Ignorance in the form of objects covering the Real. Soonyavaada is the antithesis of Ignorance of both kinds. It removes all fears. It is pure knowledge. Buddha has taught his doctrine to enable us to overcome all sufferings and thus to become real Bhikshu (bhinnakleso bhikshuhu) and obtain Nirvaana.

 
Gautama Buddha was born at a time when people in Bhaaratavarsha had become extremely worldly, selfish and greedy. According to the need of the social condition at that time, he only introduced the path of compassion for the Beings of the world which is just the saatvic quality of the Maaya. Maaya is such a peculiar power which exists like "nothing" for God realized saint, and during Mahaapralaya exists like "absolute nothingness". Accordingly it is called "Soonyavaada" which means the philosophy of nothingness or the philosophy of Maayavaada. Gautama Buddha, although he was a divine personality, did not introduce the Divinity at all in his teachings like Kapila. Nirvaana is not liberation from the Maayic bondage called Moksha in Vedic approach; it is only an intermediate stage. Liberation means the total elimination of the mind along with the past unaccountable accumulated Karmas of soul. In his teachings, main stress was laid on the practice of being humble and compassionate, and the procedures of penance, fasting, meditation and renunciation or whatsoever was formulated to improve the Saatvic quality of the doer keeping silent on the subject of God. To overthrow the growing tendency of belief on the non-existence of God, neglecting the path of compassion, which subsequently increased, Sakaraachaarya used the philosophy of Advaita (monism) and re-established Sanatana Dharma.

 

 
Philosophy Schools of Vedanta of Post-vedic Period

 
Sankara, Ramanuja and Madhva, the three great Acharyas (spiritual leaders) of Hinduism always regarded Upanishads as the sacred texts and have interpreted them so as to make them suit their theories. Their teachings fill our lives with hope and give a meaning and content to all our struggles here against ignorance and sin. In spite of the varied differences in their thinking, they are all agreed in thinking on the following:
  1. That the spiritual experience embodied in the Sruti is our ultimate authority in religion and not mere individual reasoning
  2. That God is one though He has many forms and names, and that He is an affable perfection
  3. That all men find themselves in this life in the struggle of Samsaara in accordance with their own Karma
  4. That there is triple path consisting of Karma, Bhakti and Jnaana which can lead men out of Samsaara to the perfection of God
  5. That he who would be saved should cultivate the virtues of purity, self-control, detachment, truth and ahimsa in their various forms and become Dharmaatma (righteous one)
  6. That he has further to worship his Ishtadevata according to his sampradaaya and by every means in his power acquire the grace of God
  7. And that his salvation consists in his being free from the cycle of births and deaths and gaining entrance into the world of Spirit.

 

Vedanta philosophy, leaning heavily on Upanishads, has given supreme importance to the acquisition and realization of the knowledge of Brahman and has sidelined the process of sacrificial cult. Vedantic philosophy postulates and elaborates:

 
  1. Brahman is the ultimate cause of this universe and everything else is dependent upon that one supreme cause.
  2. The universe was created in a systematic manner according to the will of that Supreme Cause.
  3. The entity of Jeevaatman is an eternal principle without any origination or destruction but is going through the cycle of births and deaths on account of attachments to the objects of the world from beginning-less time.
  4. The Jeevaatman should become aware of its true nature and destiny and has to shape itself in such a way that it gets rid of the association with matter.
  5. Everyone in this universe is entitled to become liberated but it waits only for his aspiration and effort.
  6. All these entities viz. man, matter, time and the celestial abode are dependent upon the supreme will of the Pramaatman and one has to realize his subservience to Paramaatman.
  7. The way of getting liberated from the bondage of Samsaara is to follow Upanishads. They teach that loving meditation upon the Lord and complete surrender unto His will are the means of liberation.

 
Sri Sankara did not create Advaita, nor, Madhva, Dvaitam, nor, Ramanuja Vishishtadvaita, nor, Vallabha Pushti Marga. They had their own votaries who later formed the different schools of thought. All had the source—the Prastana Trayi, viz. the Brahmasutra, the Upanishads and the Bhagavadgita. None of these Aacharyas gave anything fundamentally new, but brought out the gems in these sources, which were difficult to be realized and wrote extensive and lucid commentaries as such.

 
Though apparently looking contrary, they are not, as seen by deeper study of the Triad of Hinduism. All these had the same bases and all aimed at the same target by different paths. Sankara and Ramanuja emphasized the supernatural aspect, while Vaishnava teachers, Madhva, Vallbha and Nimbarka laid stress on the theistic aspect.

 
Swami Vivekananda was the one who realized that all the various cults were one, and throughout his life aimed and worked for the unification of those thoughts and expressions.

 
All these thinkers wrote commentaries on the basic Hindu literature, i.e., Prastaana Trayi and thereby forged a link between the present and the past and thus kept up a continuity of thought.

 
ADVAITA PHILOSOPHY

 
Sankara was born in Kaaladi in the eighth century according to Western historians, which is presently disputed and takes back to several years in B.C. Chandrasekharendra Sarasvati of Kamkotipeetham indicates his period as 509-477 B.C. He was the greatest exponent of the Advaita Philosophy. He wrote Commentaries on Vedanta (Uttara Meemaamsa), Geeta and the Upanishads and gave a new dimension to devotional literature by including in it mysticism clothed in exquisite poetry. He codified popular Hinduism and grouped all the beliefs, gods and goddesses under six main streams of worship.

 
Ultimate Reality, according to Sankara, is Atman or Brahman which is pure consciousness which is devoid of all attributes (nirguna) and all categories of the intellect (nirvisesha). Brahman is associated with its potency (sakti) Maaya or multividya and appears as the qualified Brahman (saguna or sarvasesha or apara Brahman) or the Lord Iswara who is the creator, preserver and destroyer of this world which is His appearance.

 
Jeeva or the individual Self is a subject-object complex. Its subject is pure Consciousness and is called Saakshin. Its object element is internal organ called, antahkarma which is bhautika as it is composed of five elements, with the predominance of Tejas or trance. The source of the internal organ is Avidya which causes individuality. In liberation avidya is destroyed by Jnaana and Saakshin is realized as Brahman which it always is.

 
Maaya or Avidya is not pure illusion. It is not only absence of knowledge but also positive wrong knowledge. It is not existent for existent is only Brahman. It is not non-existent for it is responsible for the appearance of the Brahman. This conception is self-contradictory. It is called neither real nor unreal. In the example of the rope and the snake, snake vanishes when rope is seen. When right knowledge arises, this error vanishes. Brahman is the ground on which the world appears through Maaya. When right knowledge dawns the essential unity of the Jeeva with Paramaatman is realized, Maaya or Avidya vanishes.

 
Sankara emphasizes that from phenomenal point of view world is quite real. It is not an illusion. It is practical reality. He distinguishes dream from the waking state. Things seen in a dream are quite true as long as the dream lasts; they are sibilated when we are awake. Similarly, the world is quite real so long as true knowledge does not dawn. When Jeeva realizes through knowledge and knowledge alone, Karma being subsidiary, liberation is attained here and now (Jeevanmukti) and final release (videhamukti) is obtained after the death of the body. He refuted the Buddhist teaching that the world is totally unreal and said that the objective world does exist in relation to the ordinary mind but it is not the ultimate Reality. In relation to the latter, however, it is an illusion. Dreams are private. They are the creations of the Jeeva. The world is public. It is the creation of Iswara. Iswara never misses the unity. Jeeva is ignorant of the essential     unity.

 

 
  1. VISISHTAADVAITA PHILOSOPHY

 
Ramanuja, founder of Visishtaadvaita philosophy school was born in Tamilnadu, in Sriperambadur in 1017. His spiritual master was Yamunacharya.

 
His philosophy is called Visishtaadvaita (qualified Monism) which means that God is only one but the soul and Maaya are the two eternal affiliates of Absolute and Supreme God. Maaya is lifeless power having the three Gunas—satva, rajas and tamas. Souls are infinitesimal and unlimited. God is the soul of all souls. Sentient souls are eternally under the veil of Maaya called Karma Sareera, which is destroyed only with the grace of God and not by any amount of yogic practices, austerity or any spiritual practice.
Soul is eternal servant of God. It becomes happy and Blissful only when it meets its divine beloved God in His Personal form.

 
Soul is eternally real and eternally distinct from God and eternally dependent on Him. The soul is ever atomic (anu) in size dwelling in the heart like a point of light and therefore distinct from God who is all pervasive. There are three classes of souls, nitya, mukta and baddha. To the first class belong those who are eternally free and who live with God in Vaikuntha. To the second class belongs who were once subjected to samsara but who have now acquired salvation and live with God. And, to the third class belongs who are still in meshes of Samsara and who are striving to be saved.

 
Salvation can be obtained only by the Grace of God responding to the call of Bhakti and Prapatti or self-surrender on the part of the worshipper. Karma and Jnaana are only means to Bhakti. The released souls attain to the nature of God and never lose their individuality; they are only released from samsara. And their release comes only after quitting the body, for, according to Ramanuja there is no such thing as Jeevanmukti.

 
(Please also refer to the discourse: "Vishishtaadvaita Philosophy of Ramanuja on the Blog")

 
3. DVAITA PHILOSOPHY

 
Madhvacharya was born in a village near Udupi to an orthodox family of Brahmins. He is considered to be an avatara of Vaayu.

 
Dvaita philosophy of Madhva has many points in common with the Visishtadvaita of Ramnuja. There are three eternal entities fundamentally different from one another—God, the soul and the world. Of these God is Swatantra, or an independent reality and the
other two are Paratantra are dependent realities.
He does not create them, but only rules them. God is a person whose grace is necessary for the salvation of the worshipper. Madhva identifies God with Vishnu living in Vaikuntha along with his consort Lakshmi who is the personification of His creative power. God manifests Himself through various vyuhas or forms and avataras or incarnations. He is also antaryamin or the inner controller of souls. Souls are atomic in size and are of three kinds, nitya, mukta and baddha. These are points of agreement between Ramanuja and Madhva.

 
Madhva, however differs from Ramanuja on the following points:

 
  1. Madhva does not admit that the world is the body of the God. According to him, God is only the efficient cause of the world and not the material cause. The distinction between God and the world of matter and souls is absolute and disqualified. That is why his system is called Dvaita or Dualism.
  2. Madhva holds that, though every atom of space in the universe is filled with Jeevas, no two jeevas are alike in character. They are essentially different from one another and belong to different grades even in their enjoyment of Bliss after salvation.
  3. Madhva further classifies souls that are still bound to the wheel of Samsara into three classes: a) those, who, being Saatvika nature, are preordained for salvation; b) those who, being of Rajas nature, are preordained to wander for all time in the labyrinth of samsara.; c) and those who, being Tamasa nature, are preordained to suffer in eternal darkness.
  4. Madhva holds that souls cannot get salvation except through a mediator who gives them the saving knowledge. This mediator is Vayu, the son of Vishnu.

     

     
    (Please also refer to: "Madhva and his philosophy of Dwaita on the Blog)

 

 

 
Philosophy Schools of Bhakti

 
The period in which Sankaracharya was born was such a time when Vedic teachings were in abundance in the country. The so-called followers of Nyaaya and Sankhya Darsana involved themselves more and more in intellectual debates. The Jain and Buddhist monks got involved in criticizing the Vedas and non-godly propagations. Sankaracharya therefore picked only one aspect of the Divinity where a) the infinitesimal soul of beings is substantially synonymous with the Absolute Divinity; b) all the attractions of the world of Maaya totally disappear without a trace after God-realization. He widely propagated Advaita Philosophy. But after his Digvijaya, he felt that his Advaita philosophy has found favor only with the intellectuals and therefore promoted Bhaktimaarga as seen in his book Probhoda Sudhaakara in which he gave the true view of his philosophy and teachings. Bhakti school was started by Sankaraachaaarya, widely propagated by Ramanuja and vigorously pursued by Madhvaacharya. Subsequently three most important Bhakti Schools were established and gained popularity in different parts of India. These are Nimbarkar's School, Vallabha's School and Chaitanya's School.

 
  1. NIMBARKAR'S SCHOOL

 
Nimbarkar was a Telugu Brahmin. He paved the way for very popular worship of Radha and Krishna around the 14th century. He was the first to identify the Supreme Brahman as the divine couple "Radha-Krishna".

 
His philosophy is known as "Dvaitaadvaita", Oneness and difference, a position between Sankara's Monism and Madhva's Dualism. His philosophy bears very close resemblance to that of Ramanuja and it appears that he has borrowed the whole thing from his illustrious predecessor adding his own important amendments and modifications here and there. He said that both dualistic and non-dualistic aspects of Reality are equally real. Souls and inanimate matter are aspects of God, not separate from Him. Devotion to God ultimately brings knowledge, which liberates the soul form future births. According to him, in the formula 'tat tvam asi' 'tat' means the eternal all pervading Brahman; 'tvam' means the dependent soul; 'asi' means the relation of difference-cum –non-difference between them.

 
2. VALLABHA'S SCHOOL

 
Vallabhaacharya was a Telugu Brahmin like Nimbarkar, born in 1479 in M.P. His philosophy is known as Suddha Advaita or Pure Non-dualism undefiled by Maaya. He taught about Saguna Brahman, Brahman with attributes. He saw everything as Lord Krishna. He said that souls are one with God, as sparks are with fire and contain the qualities of Brahman— Eternity (sat), Intelligence (chit) and Bliss (aananda). He taught that Bhaktimaarga, the path by which God's grace is gained by devotion, brings liberation. He taught pure Monism. Brahman is the independent reality and is identified with Krishna. Souls and matter are his real manifestations. They are his parts. He is smaller than the smallest and greater than the greatest.
He is one as well as many. It is by his will that he manifests Himself and souls revealing His tripartite nature of Existence, Knowledge and Bliss in different proportions. Maaya or Avidya is his Power through which He manifests Himself as many. But this manifestation is neither an error nor illusion. It is real manifestation.

 

 

 
  1. CHAITANYA'S SCHOOL (1485—1534 A.D.)

 
Chaitanya emphasized the importance of glorifying God's name and chanting in congregation, called Sankeertana, with devotees. He taught everything in the world is one and yet different from God. In sects associated with Chaitanya, Lord Krishna with     His consort Radha is worshipped as the personification of ultimate Love. Chaitanya said, God is everywhere and in everything; and yet God is nowhere and nothing except Himself, to be found in the highest heaven. Chaitanya's philosophy is a strange combination of Sankara's Advaita and Madhva's Dvaita philosophies. The Hare Krishna movement started by Sadguru Prabhupaada is based on Chaitanya's school of thought.

 
Brahman or Sri Krishna is essentially Sacchidaananda and is the auspicious abode of infinite good qualities and powers. God is free from all differences—homogenous, heterogeneous and internal, and yet He really manifests Himself as the World and souls through His powers which are identical and yet different from Him. In Himself He is the efficient cause of the Universe, while in association with His powers, He is the material cause.

 
His inner power which forms His essence is called Antaranga Swaroopa Shakti and manifests itself as threefold power as 'Sandhini', which is 'Sat' or existence, as 'Samvit' which is 'Chit' or knowledge and as 'Hlaadini' which is 'Aananda' or Bliss. The power through which He manifests Himself in the form of the atomic souls is called Thatastha Sakti or Jeevasakti. The power through which He manifests Himself as the material world is called Maaya Shakti and is said to be His external power, Bahiranga Shakti. God as Bliss is the qualified, while all his powers are His qualifications. The atomic souls are innumerable and remain distinct even in liberation. They emanate from, like rays of Sun and are absolutely dependent on Him. The World is the manifestation of His external power and is not false. The impurities and defects of the world do not affect Him at all. In liberation, the wrong notions and the ignorance of the soul vanish, though the world as the power of God remains. Bhakti is the sole means of liberation. Vidhibhakti is Bhakti according to Vedas and Shaastras. Ruchibhakti is affectionate service to God for His sake alone. Ruchibhakti is the end. It consists in the intense spiritual love for God like that of Gopis and culminates in the eternal enjoyment of the blissful love for Krishna.

 

 
SAIVA SCHOOLS

 
  1. SAIVA SIDDHAANTA

 
The worship of Shiva or Rudra goes back to the Vedic period. In the Yajurveda we have Satarudriya. The Taittireeya Aaranyaka tells us that the whole universe is manifestation of Rudra. The sacred literature of the Saivas is called Saiva Aagama, which is placed side by side with Vedas. Madhvacharya refers to four schools of Saivism—Paashupata, Saiva, Pratyabhijna and Raseshwara. Besides, we find two more sects, Kaapaalika and Kaalamukha. Saivism of Saiva Sampradaya is further divided into Veerasaiva (Shakti-Vishishtaadvaita also known as Lingaayata) and Saiva Siddhaanta. Saiva Siddhaanta is representative of Southern Saivism and Pratyabhijna or Kashmeera Saivism is representative of Northern Saivism.

 
Saiva Siddhaanta recognizes eighteen Aagamas. Meykkandar, the author of the Sivajnaanabodham who belongs to the thirteenth century is regarded as the first systematic expounder of the Saivasiddhaanta philosophy. Saiva Siddhaanta School in Tamil Nadu and the Veerasaiva Sam,pradaya in Karnataka follow the Visishtaadvaita principle. VeerasaivaSampradaya which flourished in Karnataka 1000 years ago stood for casteless society, opposed to child marriage, approved widow marriage and disapproved Sati. It was founded by Basaveshwara. Thirukkural, by Thiruvalluvar, a weaver by birth (first century B.C.), in Tamil language is considered to be the Holy Scripture of Saivites. It is universal in nature. It teaches the value of life. Dr Albert Scweitzer called it "one of the grandest achievements of the human mind".

 
The Saiva Sampradaaya of South India was propagated by the sixty-three saints called Naayanmars, five of them being well known--Thirumalaar, Appar, Sundarar, Sambandar and Manickka Vaachakar. The hymns composed by them form the very basis of Saiva Siddhaanta in the South. They are the distilled essence of Vedanta. The hymns of the Saiva saints compiled by a saint named Nambiyaandar Nambi in the 11th century A.D., constitute the Saiva Holy Scripture called "Thirumurai" and is adopted by Saivites for worship in temples and at homes even today.
Saiva Siddhaanta calls itself Shuddha Advaita,"Shuddha"means unqualified and "Advaita" means Dvaita devoid of duality. The difference is real in existence but inseparable from identity in consciousness. This means though matter and souls are real, yet they are not opposed to Siva but are inseparably united with Him who is the Supreme Reality.

 
Siva is the Supreme Reality and is called "Pati" or the Lord who possesses the eight attributes of self existence, essential purity, intuitive wisdom, infinite intelligence, freedom from all bonds, infinite grace or love, omnipotence and infinite bliss. The individual souls are called "Pasu" for like cattle they are bound by the rope of Avidya in this world. Soul is really an all-pervading eternal and conscious agent and enjoyer. It has consciousness the essence of which is in the act of visualizing. It is different from the gross and subtle body and the sense organs etc. The bound souls mistake themselves as finite and limited in will, thought and action and are restored to their original nature in Liberation.

 
The fetters which bind the souls are called Paasa and are threefold—Avidya, Karma, and Maaya. Avidya is one in all beings and is beginning-less. It is also called Aanava-mala or the impurity which consists in the false notion of the soul to regard itself finite or atomic and confined to the body and limited in
the knowledge and power. It is Avidya because it makes the soul ignorant of its inherent glory and greatness. It is Aanava because it makes the soul mistake itself as atomic and finite. It is the bondage (pasutva) of the beast (pasa). Karma is produced by the deeds of the souls and is subtle and unseen and is the cause of the union of the conscious with the unconscious. Maaya is the material cause of this impure world. The souls are of three kinds, according to what they are tainted with--one or two or three of these impurities. The highest souls are tainted with the Aaanava-mala only; the next with Aanava and Kaarmana-mala; and the last with all the three—Aanava, Kaarmana and Maayeeya. They are called respectively Vignaanakaala, Pralayakaala and Sakaala. In order to obtain release the soul has to get rid of these impurities. For this God's grace is absolutely essential. The Divine grace is there for all of us, all without the asking for it, for the Lord desires that all souls should know Him. It is only for us to avail of it or not. After the removal of the Paasa, the soul becomes one with Him and shares His glory and greatness. It is no more conscious of its individuality (which is there) on account of the experience of Bliss. It attains the status of Siva, through the five functions of creation etc. that are reserved for Siva only.

 

 

 

 
KASHMEERA SAIVISM

 
This school is also known as Pratyabhijna or Trika or Spanda system. This system also claims to be based on Aagamas based on Upanishads which are Advaitic in nature. These are in Sanskrit. Kashmeera Shaivism admits thirty-six Tattvas or principles of cosmic manifestations. Through the five important aspects of Shakti known as chit, aananda, ichchaa, jnaana and kriyaa, arise Shiva, Shakti, Sadaashiva, Iswara and Suddhavidya, the five transcendental tattvas. That aspect of Shakti which makes the infinite appear as finite is the sixth Maaya tattva. It gives rise to the five Kanchukas—power (kalaa), knowledge (vidyaa), attachment (raaga), time (Kaala) and space (niyati). Through these, Maaya makes the Infinite Shiva appear as finite Purusha, which is the twelfth tattva. The rest of the twenty-four tattvas are the same as "Prakriti" and its twenty-three evolutes recognized in the Saankhya system.

 
Shiva is the only Reality, the one without a second. He is infinite consciousness and absolute independence (swaatantrya). He creates everything by the force of His will. He is the subject as well as the object. He is the foundation of all knowledge and all proof and disproof equally presuppose His existence. He makes the world appear in Him as if it were distinct from Him, though not really so—even as objects in the mirror. By his own wonderful power (shakti) inherent in Him, God appears in the form of souls and constitutes objects for their experience. The only reality is the unlimited pure Self, the one and only substratum of the universe, whose activity or vibration (spanda) is the cause of all distinctions. The changing manifestations of Shiva do not stain His purity and unchanging nature since He transcends His own manifestations (aabhaasa). Shiva is the transcendental eternal background of this universe. His Shakti has infinite aspects, most important of which are chit, aananda, ichchaa, jnaana, and kriyaa. Maaya is neither the material cause of the Universe nor the principle of illusion. It is the aspect of the power (shakti) of Shiva through which He manifests Himself as many. The individual soul is pure consciousness and as such identical with Shiva. It is the ultimate reality under conditions of self-limitations. Plurality of souls is
not final. Apart from Shiva, the world is not; different from Shiva, the soul is not. Recognition of this reality is essential in obtaining liberation. Woman cannot get any consolation of joy even though her lover is present near her unless she recognizes him. The moment recognition dawns she becomes all joy.    This is also the meaning of the famous mantra "Tat Tvam Asi". Recognition at once overcomes bondage. The liberated soul becomes one with Siva and ever enjoys the mystic bliss of Oneness with the Lord. Jeevanmukti is admitted by this school.

 
(Please visit the Blog for the Philosphy of Basveswara and Veerasaivism: "Basveswara, the Philosopher Forgotten)

 

 

 
Shakta Schools

 
The worship of Shakti also dates back to the Rigveda where she is praised as the 'supporter of the earth living in heaven'. 'Uma of golden hue' of the Kenopanishad is "Great mother of the Universe". The Saivas made her the consort of Siva. The various Puraanas describe her greatness. She is known as Sakti, Devi, Chandi, Chamundi, Durga, Uma, Mahaamaaya. Sakti is the power of existence, knowledge and bliss of Brahman and is inseparable from it. Sakti may be taken as male, female or neutral as Vishnu, indicated in Vishnu Sahasrnama. Siva is the pure indeterminate Brahman, while Sakti, the power of Maaya, makes him determinate, endowed with the attributes of knowledge, will and action. Saundaryalahari says, "Siva when he is united with Sakti, is able to create; otherwise he is unable to move! Siva without Sakti is Sava, a corpse. Sakti is the life of Siva as she is his wife".

 
Human body is conscious as well as unconscious. The conscious part is Aatman, which is associated with the mental world by Maaya which is otherwise inert. Power is force plus energy. Sakti is power in general and includes every particular form of it like motion, kinetic, gravitation, heat, elasticity, plasticity and electricity. Force is power translated to material plane. Energy and power are represented by subtle mind and gross matter. Mind power (of reasoning, willing, feeling, loving etc.) is governed by Praana through Maaya. Similarly gross matter is constituted of elements is also subjected to Maaya. Mother breaks into power and becomes active for creation, maintenance and dissolution. Worship of Parabrahman as Paraashakti, the feminine form, especially as Mother, yields quick results as it is the nature of Mother to forgive the faults of her children. This is the basis of Sakta Philosophy.

 
Supreme God incarnates whenever there is trouble, to destroy enemies, so says the Lord in Geeta. In the same sense, in Devi Mahaatmyam, the Mother says that she incarnates as male like Rama and Krishna; Divine incarnations of Rama and Krishna are, therefore, manifestations of Sakti and represent the protective force.

 
Siva is absolute consciousness without form and Sakti (energy) is the witness of time and space, projected from the consciousness. Self is pure intelligence and real Universe is Supreme Intelligence. The apparent variety is due to the gross aspect of the Absolute, manifesting as Universe. At the other extreme, the Absolute withdraws into itself and remain not manifested. Thus abstraction and manifestation are two aspects of Siva and Sakti and Sakti, Universe and Self are the same but different modes of Reality, which is Consciousness, Maaya and Ignorance.

 
Energy is the physical ultimate of matter. All matter is relatively stable form of energy—they last for some time and disappear as energy. Things created by God are all there for us to use. Conservation of energy, kinetic energy and potential, is basic to our existence. The sum total of energy is the same. The potential energy is converted kinetic energy and made use of. Thus we can only change or transform the potential into kinetic but the energy is the same, only its form is different.

 
Energy is limited manifestation of infinite Supreme Power of Mahaa Shakti. What is manifested is supposed to be one fourth (Jnaana--knowledge) but the unmanifested portion is three-fourths (Vignana—Intelligence). Shiva and Shakti are one and the same; without Shiva, Shakti has no existence and without Shakti, Shiva has no expression.

 
The relationship between static Brahman and active Ihwara is transferred to Shiva and Shakti in the Shakta theology, Shiva being the inactive Brahman and Shakti is the active Ishwara. As the word Sakti is feminine in Sanskrit, the personification results in a Goddess. Siva is Shakti and Sakti is Siva, two aspects of the same reality, and, static and dynamic aspects.

 
The whole world of matter and souls exist potentially in Shakti who is the inseparable power of Shiva. Maaya or Prakriti, the matrix of the world, lies within Shakti. The souls mistake themselves as infinite and many due to the influence of Maaya. Liberation is due to the knowledge that the so called soul is non-different from Brahman. Knowledge of Shakti leads to this knowledge. Liberation means 'dissolution in the blissful effulgence of the Supreme'. Jeevanmukti is admitted in Shakta philosophy also. The mystic side of Yoga is emphasized. Mantra and Tantra are sacred and divine. Awakening of the Kundalini and piercing of the six Chakras are practiced. Naadayoga is glorified.

 
The Shakti Tantras are divided into three schools—Kaula, Saamaanya and Misra. Some Kaulaas are called Vaama-maargi and are generally believed to be indulging in abominable and ghastly practices. Kula means Shakti and Kundalini and Akula means Shiva. He alone is therefore a Kaula who succeeds in uniting Shakti with Shiva. He is a Jeevanmukta, a Stahitaprajnya for whom the mud or sandal paste, enemy and son, wood and gold, life and death are the same. External marks are useless. The highest is the union with Brahman; the middle is the meditation on Brahman; the lower is the praise of the Lord and the recitation of hymns and the lowest is external worship.

 
(For Aurobindo Philosophy please visit the Blog: The Phenomenon of Rebirth and its Knotty Earthly Problems)

 

 
Conclusion

 
Hinduism has produced some of the world's most important philosophies, particularly, the various schools of Vedanta. Mere existence of philosophies of Kapila, Jabali, Kaanada, Brihaspati and others in Hinduism is the most important symbol of Hindu tolerance. The extremes among them died due to the utmost freedom of thought in the latter part but not due to any authoritative house cleaning. Yet, Hindu view of philosophy is very different than that of the West. The correct Hindu word for philosophy is Darsana, which means "a way of perception". Each of the philosophies of Hinduism is a spiritual approach which requires following a certain life-style, ethical discipline and practicing yogic methods to arrive at this perception. Hindu philosophies are meant to help individuals to realize the Truth beyond the world of the
senses. Modern India has not only maintained its ancient philosophical tradition but has also produced
new world renowned philosophers like Basveswara, Sri Aurobindo, Ramana Maharshi, Swami Vivekananda, Annie Besant, Krishnamoorthy, and others.

 

 

 

 

 
This lecture has been prepared by N.R. Srinivasan for the Vedanta class at Sri Ganesha Temple Nashville, extracting, abridging and editing from the following sources:

 
  1. Chandradhar Sharma, A Critical Survey of Indian Philosophy, Motilal Banarasidass Publishers
Private Limited, New Delhi
  1. Ed. Viswanathan, Am I A Hindu? Rupa & Co., New Delhi
  2. Dr N.S.Ananta Rangacharya, Selections from Upanishads, Bangalore
  3. Swami Prakashanand Saraswati, The True History of India, International Society for Divine Love, Barsana Dham, Texas, USA
  4. David Frawley, Hinduism, Voice of India, New Delhi
  5. T.R.Viswanathan, Sanatana Dharma, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Mumbai, India
  6. D.S.Sharma, A Premier of Hinduism, Bharatiya Vidhya Bhavan, Mumbai, India
  7. Shakuntala Jagannathan, Hinduism, Vakils, Feffer and Simons Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India
  8. Will Durant, The Story of Civilization, Simon & Schuster New York, 1963

 

Wednesday, April 25, 2012

HISTORIC BUDDHA IS AN AVATAR OF VISHNU, WHY NOT THEN JINA?



 

HISTORIC BUDDHA IS AN AVATAR OF VISHNU, WHY NOT THEN JINA?

(I-Discourse by N. R. Srinivasan, June 2011)

April 16, this year, celebrated the birthday of Mahavir Jain, the 24th Teerthankara of Jain Religion. He was the son of King Siddhaarta and Queen Trisula who had difficulty for having a child. According to a legend Devananda, wife of a Brahmin named Rishbhaananda conceived him. It is also believed that gods transferred the embryo to the womb of Trisula. Even though this story is dismissed by many as impossible and a myth, of late many believe in it as surrogating has become a common feature, in the modern wonder of science which as usual they say Hindus knew it long before anybody else which may or may not be true! He was born on the 13th day of the rising moon fortnight of Chaitra in 615 B.C.E. as believed by the Digambara sect. He was born in 599 B.C.E. according to Svetambara sect of Jains.

 

The first Tirthankara of Jain Religion is sage Rishabha of Ikshvaaku race, son of King Nabhi and Merudevi. Valmiki   says in the last chapter of Uttara Khanda Sloka 10: “Ayodhyaapi Puree ramyaa soonyaa varshaganaan bahoon| Rishabham praapya Rajaqnam nivaasamupaayaasyati || The beautiful Ayodhya  remaining desolate for long years, will become habitable again having secured the protection of King Rishabha.  King Rishabha is the father of Bharata. He is also called Adinatha. Rishabha was so named because he was a bull amongst men. Rishabha ruled wisely, teaching men seventy-two vocational skills and sixty-four domestic arts prevalent in Vedic culture during Vedic period. He is also credited with establishing Varna system, a sound system for peaceful and harmonious growth of society. Rishbha had many children. His daughter Brahmi invented the Brahmi Script as given in the discourse on "Hindu Education through the Ages". His son Bharata is believed to be the great King Bharata of fame after whom India was named Bharatavarsha, (Kingdom of Bharata) according to Jains. Foreign invaders had difficulty in pronouncing this ancient name and so gave it a new name India, which also gave them an opportunity to twist the history of India to their convenience, as we discussed before. His second son is Baahubali, whose gigantic 57 feet monolithic granite statue stands on a hillock in Sravanabelgola near Mysore for more than thousand years. He is also called Gomateswara. Kalidasa made Bharata of Puru race famous in his Drama Saakuntala. Sakuntala was the daughter of Viswamitra and Menaka. Bharata was born to Dushyanta and Sakuntala. He is also a fore-runner of Pandavas. With the result the earlier famous king Bharata who turned a sage later like his father went to background and Bharata of Puru dynasty came to limelight and fame. The name Bharatavarsha is now attributed to him. The Jain Harivamsa mentions Krishna as the cousin and contemporary of the celebrated Ford-maker, Neminaatha (who is believed to have lived about eight centuries earlier than Christ). The famous battle of Kurukshetra is dated about eighth or ninth century B.C.E. by historians. Rishabha  succeeds Rama as an incarnation of Vishnu  and is acceptable to both Jains and Hindus like Buddha.

When Vishnu was asked how he could be identified on mortal earth he replied, "I am Vishnu, I am Omnipresent. I pervade everything, but I express myself best in all that is ideal, perfect, harmonious and beautiful". He then gives a list of all such ideal things which includes, "Amongst ascetics, I am Rishabha".

 
In Bhagavata Purana it is said: "Ashtame Merudevaayam Nabherjaataa urukramaha darsayana varma dheeraanaam sarvaasrama namaskritam- "— in the womb of Merudevi, wife of Nabhi Rishabha had his Eighth Avataara. He showed himself in a form that is to be worshipped by those in any stage of life. There are also other references to him in Bhagavata Puraana and Padma Puraana.

 
King Rishabha after fulfilling his duties as a king became a recluse (sanyaasi) and retired into the wilderness to lead a life of austerity. Sitting on Mount Kailaasa, Rishabha announced to the world the Jain Philosophy, one of the oldest doctrines of liberation that enables man to break the
Bondage of Karma and transcend Samsaara. Rishabha created a bridge out of the wheel of existence and became a Teerthankara, the Ford-founder (wader through the troubled waters of Samsaara). A Teertha is a ford or crossing place or a sacred place, person or path which enables believers to cross over into liberation from endless round of rebirths. Teerthankaras are the builders of the Ford. Thus Rishbha, the Jina or Conqueror of Passions who built a bridge out of wheel of existence is described as an incarnation of Vishnu in Bhaagavata, but this is not accepted by followers of the Jain faith. Earlier a Jain version of Ramayana as hard copy was made available to Vedanta Class in which references to Adinatha was cited.

 
You might all be wondering what significance has this birthday to Hindus as well as our present discourse. As you are perhaps aware some Hindu Temples in USA have installed the idol of Mahavira Vardhamana in their complexes and also conduct worship based on Aagama Sastras or as per Hindu religious practices. One such temple is Albany Hindu Temple in New York State. I was also associated with its development and inauguration. They have also included Swaminarayana idol and Nageswara (for serpants) idols. Usually serpent idols are kept outside the sanctum under a tree. Here again there was a benevolent donor. There are also temples which have Saibababa's idol within the complex along with other deities. They have all been installed with customary Kumbhabhishekam. There are no problems if they are individual temples. Problems arise when they are within the same complex of Hindu Temple and individual sanctums are desired. Of course we can always apply the universal maxim, "Eko viprah bahudaa vadanti", The ONE the wise call by many. In India there is a temple for Bharatmata too in Haridwar, an Avataar created by Bankim Chatterjee in his famous song Vande Maataram. Bankim Chatarjee should have been motivated by the mantras in Upanishads which glorify Earth by chanting which they wear the soil on the head in reverence! Bharat is identified with that Goddess earth or may be considered as an avataar of Goddess Earth!

 
Hindu Population in Albany area, were able to convince rich and affluent Jain community to finance the Hindu Temple project. This made them morally bound to install the idol Mahavira in the complex along with the customary idols. Probably Adinatha would have been a better compromise! Migrant Jains of Indian origin were happy to join the Hindu crowd and were happy they had a place of their own for worship. Probably they did not have enough strength to have a Jain temple there? Priests could find a way out to continue with their traditional worship as per Aagama Saastras, considering him a sub-avatar of Rishabha, even though they would not do it for Mariamman (a village deity) even in India. Usually Mariamman temples have Non-Brahmin priests who are not trained in Aaagama saastras.

 
A big trouble arose in Albany when one of the founder-members happened to be a Neo-Buddhist. He insisted on a sanctum for the Historic Lord Buddha too. Priests and some orthodox Hindus would not oblige even though Jayadeva has glorified the ninth incarnation as Historic Buddha. Jayadeva's Geeta Govinda, which popularized Vaishnavism in Bengal and also in East India, includes Buddha as the ninth incarnation. His Dasaavataara list includes Balarama as the eighth Avataar but excludes Lord Krishna. In his concept all Avataaras emanated from the full avataar of Krishna alone as he is Jagannatha, Lord of the Universe coming from his Oriyan background and thinking. Also some religious composers and writers in their Dasaavataara stories and Stotras have sung or written in praise of Historic Buddha. Orthodox writers have included Balarama (Vedanta Desika) or Mohini in place of Historic Buddha. "In Bhagavata (1, 3), this Buddha was born in the Keekata country, as the son of Anjana, and that the purpose of his appearance was to delude and confound the enemies of gods (Sammoehaaya sura-dvishaam); he is said to have been born at the commencement of the Kali Yuga (kalau sampravritte). Later texts have shown him as nude (digambara) and in an obscene posture (for he is said to have taught the philosophy of lust and satisfaction to lure the Raakshas into self-destruction). Hayaseersha Samhita has done a better justice as an incarnation of Vishnu, seated in Padmaasana (Lotus Posture) with closed eyes in a meditative mood "--[Vide Vishhnu-Kosha, Kalpataru Research Academy of Sri Sringeri Sharada Peetham]. Nobody dare dispute Mohini Avatara.

 
I have also earlier talked to you on these Avataaras of Historic and Orthodox Buddhas. As far as Lord Jina is concerned, there are no such contradictions. The parenthood of Rishabha as well as his being the father of famous Bharata described in Bhagavata, historic views as well as Jain beliefs, are all identical. However the religious and historic dates vary and this is a common problem. I here recall your attention to my detailed write-up on the subject of "Problems of Historic and Orthodox dates in Indian History". After long arguments and discussions with religious authorities it was agreed to install the idol of Buddha at Albany Temple without the usual Kumbabhishekam but the aagama priest also decided not to do puja himself but devotees could come and self-worship just like what they generally do in Lingabhishekam individually as per the practices even in holy places like Varaanasi without the help of a religious priest. Probably the Soonyavaada of Buddha and his silence over Brahman could not convince the priest and others. In my opinion, Jina is more convincing and acceptable than Historic Buddha with his great philosophy identical with Hindu Religion also because of Jains' absolute addiction to vegetarianism than followers of Historic Buddha outside India.

 
Buddha never claimed to be God. He said that he was a teacher in search of the truth. Mahaayaana Buddhism made icons of Buddhas for worship and there are 54 to 100 later Buddhas. In the wake of Vajrayaana, Buddhist pantheon became larger and spectacular, though failed to match Hinduism in its number of deities. Growing popularity of Buddha all over the world worried Vedic scholars very early. According to some, Hindus needed an Avataar from a higher caste after Krishna. Buddha of Kshatriaya caste suited them. So too was Rishabha more famous as a king with his son Bharata, who succeeded him. According to these critics, the purpose of Buddha's incarnation was to mislead men of low birth and genius who had become too proficient in the sacred lore (like Azhwars and Naayanmars as well as saints in the later medieval period) and were a thought threat to the supremacy of Gods. Early Vedic scripture proclaim Devas were only Brahmins while humans were not. But staunch Vaishnavites like Vedanta Desika came with strong support for Balarama as the eighth incarnation, who was a Yadava, and an avataar of Adisesha like the founder of Srivaishnava Sampradaaya, Ramanuja. They all worshipped low caste Azhwars whose idols are installed in Vishnu and Siva temples. So the above theory of few skeptical did not hold grounds.

 
The earlier and more traditional list of incarnations included Historic Buddha as the ninth unlike the later thought that included Balarama or Mohini instead of Buddha. However it is obvious that Hindus sealed the fate of the Buddhism in the Country by absorbing Historic Buddha into the pantheon of the Dasaavataras, outweighing other considerations. Jainism was not that wide spread nor was a threat to Hinduism. Somehow it failed to meet the standard for Dasaavataara. Many feel that Sankara came with his Advaita theory strongly to kill the popularity of Buddhism which was leaning more towards atheism and a threat to sacrificial form of Hindu worship. In later years Sankara promoted strongly Bhaktimaarga and composed many hymns on all major Hindu deities, and even confessed before Lord Viswanatha that he is making a grave mistake by attributing many names to the One Supreme within him, as well as what he was visualizing standing before him is committing another mistake for Lord Viswanatha before him is not different from the Self in him.

 
Neo-Buddhists and Tibetans from India are not keen to join the East Asiatic Heenayaana or Mahaayaana crowd in migrant countries probably because of their cultural and food differences. Buddhists in East Asiatic Countries are either beef eaters or pork eaters. They would, therefore much rather compromise on Historic Buddha who has been accepted amongst Hindu pantheon of gods by majority. However, Historic Buddha has not yet entered the Hindu Temple Complexes in the sanctums, though he is generally accepted as ninth Avataara in India which obligates Buddha's worship according to aagama saastras. There are several individual and famous ancient and modern temples for both Buddha and Jina in India where there is no bar for Hindus to participate in Buddhist or Jain worship and activities. However Buddha is freely displayed in all wall panels and pillars in Hindu temples but not in sanctums. He is also popularized by South Indians in Navaraatri Kolu displays as well as souvenirs amidst Dasaavataara sets of figures. Buddha Jayanti, Birthday of Buddha is a National Holiday in India, but not a religious holiday though Buddha is considered to be an avataar of Vishnu by many.

 
Hinduism however has an open–mind and constantly undergoing changes in its form and mode of worship as long as it does not negate the moral and ethical values promoted by Vedas. Migrant Arya Samajists are comfortable with homa and yajna conducted in Hindu Temples though not comfortable with Hindu idols; they enjoy participating in all Havan ceremonies in Hindu Temples which is their mode of worship, an ancient Vedic ritual. Migrant Hindus have preference to Jina than Buddha as an incarnation of Vishnu and are happy to welcome Jain Community to their fold because they love their puritan way of Ahimsa practice in true spirit. Jains are also happy to join Hindus on important days like Diwaali where Lakshmi is worshipped. Being rich and prosperous they enjoy the worship of Goddess Lakshmi and share their wealth too for charitable purposes along with Hindus. India is well known for many charitable and endowment Jain Trusts.

 
I often wonder why Hanuman is not considered amongst Dasavataraas. He is non–controversial and most popularly worshipped deity like Ganesha in all Vishnu Temples. He is seen being worshiped in sanctums with no controversy. He is the product of the same pudding that was carried by Agni to Dasaratha's wives with additional help from Vayudeva. He is probably the next Brahma when the term of present Brahma ends. Of course we are still in the 51st year of Brahma all according to Puraanas. Another forgotten deity is Lakshamana who has been more co-operative with Rama than Balarama with Krishna. He is also an incarnation of Adisesha and is always present with Rama in the sanctum. Maybe he was too mild and modest unlike Balarama who was assertive as big brother. But how Balarama and Lakshmana can also be incarnations of Vishnu being incarnations of Adisesha is not understandable! But Bhaagavata Purana says Balarama is an avatar of Vishnu.

 
I often wonder why the later religious thinkers did not replace Parasurama Avataara with that of Jina in Dasavataara to complete the list instead Orthodox Buddha. Parasurama Avtaara is the most controversial known for its horrifying mass murders of Kshatriya race which is indicative of class hatred. He also beheaded his mother Renuka at the command of his father, but later restored her back to life. There are very few temples for him, confined probably to West Coast, being the son of the soil. Probably we are not clear about his mission as an Avataar as there is no Puraana in the name of Parasurma.

 
We have Puranas for all other deities—Matsya, Kurma, Varaha, Vamana, Rama, Krishna and Buddha. I do not know whether Narasimha has one. But there is an Upanishad exclusively devoted to Narasimha called Narasimha Tapaneeya Upanishad. There are also many slokas in his glory including one by Sankaracharya, Lakshmi-Nrisimha Karaavalamba Stotram. He is celebrated in Prhlaada Puraana. Also there are many temples for him in the South. Narasimha idols are installed even in Siva temples of Orissa. There is one in Puri Temple also. In temple rituals in Puri which follows Tantric form of worship, Lord Narasimha and Soorya are invariably invoked. It is believed during British period Bhairava, the fearful form of Siva who was on the Ratnavedi was removed due to strong Vaishnava domination. Narasimha is the fearful form of Vishnu Avataars and therefore he was found a ready substitute for fierce Bhairava in Orissa Temples. There is a strange grouping of Krishna and Narasimha avataara in temple worship. In Chennai Lord Krishna as Parthasarathy and Lord Narasimha have separate sanctums in the same complex as in Puri. Sthala Purana says Narasimha accommodated Lord Krishna returning from war tired. I have come across one lone stotra on Parasurama and usually one or two stanzas in Dasaavataara Stotras glorifying him. Probably Kerala has more. Naaraayaneeyam of Bhattadri from Kerala has glorified him. But for these, he seems to be least celebrated. He is the patron saint for Namboodri families in Kerala. He is also believed to have recovered the land of Kerala from sea.

 
There seems to be a strong basis why Narasimha is equated with Siva in the form of Rudra or Bhairava. Maha Narayana Upanishad includes five Mantras called by the name Panchabrahma, related to the supreme Brahman. In Narasimha Tapaneeya Upanishad Lord Narasimha is praised as "Easaanah sarvavidyaanam" meaning the lord of all branches of knowledge. This description is found in one of these mantras referring to Supreme Brahman. There is another term "Sadyojata" found in these Mantras meaning 'born at the moment of His will' which is more appropriate to Lord Narasimha.

 
But the mantra starting with Sadyojaata is interpreted as related to God Rudra, the Vedic God whom Saivites have adopted for Siva. So also Mantras of Sri Rudram. Rudra means 'one who dispels miseries' and refers to Brahman in these five mantras. Rudra is a Sanskrit word derived from two words rudraat
traayate meaning one who saves from cries. Saivites glorify Siva as 'Panchaanana' or 'five faced'--Sadyojaata, Vaamadeva, Aghora, Tatpurusha and Sadasiva.
These names are equally appropriate to describe both Siva and Lord Narasimha as described in the discourse on "Selected Mantras from Maha Narayana Upanishad". Lord Siva was born as Lingodbhava Moorti as a terrific column of fire in his Avataara and Lord Vishnu was born out of a pillar in a terrible form of Man-Lion in Narasimha Avataara. Both were born at the very moment of their will (sadyojaata). Bhairava is also the terrific form of Lord Siva. Sarabha is another avatar of Siva which is like lion, which is a mythical fierce animal. This animal is seen as mount for Lord Vishnu during Brahmotsavas in all Vishnu temples. Narasimha's face also resembles Sarabha.

 
The earliest Matsyaavataara is also not worshipped in Vishnu temples. But there is a Matsya Jayanti day earmarked in Hindu Panchangas. Bengalis may not like the idea of worshipping fish, as an avataar! Fish is offered as a sacrifice at the altar in Puri Temple near the Lion during Durga Puja days. Anatomical clues recently indicate human evolution from fish. It may seem strange that humans have evolved from fish, but the evidence can be found not just in fossils but also with our own bodies (BBC recent broadcast by Dr. Michael Mosley). This theory has not found favor with orthodox Hindus as explained earlier.

 
Jayadeva excluded Krishna from the list, elevating him to Vishnu like Balaaji of Tirupati, replaced Orthodox Buddha with Historic Buddha and added Balarama, but did not replace Parasurama probably because he was a Vaishnava Brahmin whom he was afraid to touch. You all know South Indians do not consider Venkateswara as an Avatar, but worship him as Vishnu himself with different names! Baalaaji signifies Vatapatrasaayee. Jayadeva was too keen to add Haldhar as he was quite used to the idea of joint worship of Jagannatha, Subhadra and Balarbhadra being from Indradyumna's city of Puri. He did not make a bold attempt to include Subhadra as there is no female deity in the Dasaavataaras. Even earlier Mohini was not included in the famous Dasaavataaras list as this was a female Avataar though mentioned as Vishnu Avataar in Bhagavata. This would have also necessarily brought in Siva and that would not have pleased Vaishnavites. Jayadeva was a staunch promoter of Vaishnavism in Bengal and eastern parts of India. Further Aiyappan might have stolen the show being the accredited natural son of Siva and Mohini pushing away Parvati from lime-light. Ganesha and Murugan (Subhramanya) would have gone to the background being not womb-born and mental creations! Balarama of Vaishnava cult with his plough was readily accepted as he represents Agriculture, the bread and butter for all early Hindus as a profession. Only Bhaagavata Purana says he is an incarnation of Vishnu though he is celebrated as an incarnation of Adisesha by all others.

 
Parasurama's mission was to clear the Earth off the Kshatriyas or Warrior Caste as every Avataar has a purpose, which is felt as a threat on earth. This is rather a very weak reason to disguise plain and simple prejudice that Kartiveerya Arjuna murdered his father Jamadagni, a Brahmin. He went up-to 21 generations to wipe out the powerful Kshatriya race without examining whether they were good or how seriously bad. Probably this might be the cause of degeneration in body and spirit of Kshatriyas or fighting race much later that could not protect Bharatavarsha from the onslaught of Islamic invaders and later European Conquerors (Mlecchas) who established their rule. Frist center in Nashville displayed him as "Parasurama, the vengeful Brahmin who fights the members of the warrior caste" in its Exposition of Vishnu, Hinduism's Blue-Skinned Savior.

 
When I visited Vishnu Exposition at Frist Center in Nashville recently, I had no difficulty in explaining to the crowd who sought my help to know the reason for the Blue Skin of Savior Vishnu and for the horrific descriptions of some of the Avataars of him, except Parasurama Avataar. Here too I got away explaining the Darwin's Theory of Evolution (for it is not yet given up by science thinkers) that man was a savage before like Parasurama in Stone Age and later got refined and cultured like Rama. I knew in my heart that Vamana avataara preceded Parasurama who was a mild but tough bargaining Brahmin without any weapon, but luckily nobody questioned me on that! He was also too small to be noticed. I however explained to them at length that blue skin of Vishnu is not due to predominance of bad blood but only symbolic as Vishnu means Omnipresent like the blue sky above the clouds and that clouds symbolize the shackles of Samsaara (worldly troubles) which we have to overcome to enjoy blue sky. As you all know there was an eye-catching large exhibition of Vishnu, the Savior at the Frist Center in Nashville, opened to public in April this year, which no Hindu would have missed! Here Buddha is displayed as "founder of Buddhist Religion". The caption also includes that "in the Vaishnava tradition he is celebrated as false prophet" thereby implying Orthodox Buddha mentioned in Bhagavatam also besides the Historic Buddha.

 
Hindus insist Sanatana Dharma is wrongly called Hinduism. "Hinduism is a more recent nomenclature given to conglomeration of heterogeneous traditions and plurality of beliefs and worship with a long history of development from the Vedic sacrificial religion through the worship of Epic and Puranic heroes and personal deities, cults and sects, as well as philosophical systems rather than a monolithic tradition or a structure based on a simple system of beliefs and worship or a single text as scripture" according to Champaka Lakshmi, author of Hindu Temples. Viewed with this perspective it may not be a surprise that Hindus, Jains as well as Buddhists migrating from India may join together in the future to have a common place of worship as is seen by the trend to-day, bound by the Indian culture, traditions and religious faiths and beliefs in migrant countries. They are still not ready for spiritual Brahman approach but enjoy conventional religious worship with all its fanfare and side attractions. Only problem is Jains and Buddhists do not believe in Brahman to find a solution under "Eko viprah bahuda vadanti". But we can find a common ground in our philosophies. We may concentrate on the idol as Brahman! Though a Vaishnavite, I follow faithfully the religious worship of Ganesha in Hindu Temple as in my thoughts he appears as Brahman to me. They may concentrate on Jina or Buddha in the same way! We need some symbolic idol to concentrate on the Supreme as it is often explained to me. For Hindus it is no problem because even atheists are acceptable as long as they respect Vedic philosophy. Charwaka philosophy prevailed during Puraanic period. Jaabaali who advocated the theory of Naastikas (non-believers) was respected by Rama though he argued against his advises. EVR, founder of Dravida Kazhagam got away saying "He is a fool who believes in God" but still got support of majority who believed in God and got firmly established in Tamil Nadu. Who knows, broad hearted ever accommodating Hinduism may one day replace Dasaavataara with Dwadasaavataara (12), or even Shoedasaavataara (16) to accommodate all the above, based on the verdict of New Puranas or Saints! They may even accommodate Swami Naraayan and Saibaba idols in all traditional Aagama worshiped Hindu temples!

 
Yet some other things bother me. Puranas say that Dharma progressively declines from Krita Yuga to Kali Yuga. If so, Krita Yuga needed minimum number of Avataars from the Dasaavataaras than other Yugas. If you look at the official Dasaavataara list five of its early Avataaras took place in Krita Yuga, two in Treta Yuga (Rama and Parasurama), one in Dwapara Yuga, (Krishna) and one in Kali Yuga (Historic Buddha). How can we believe Krita Yuga was loaded with Adharma? Krishna said in Bhagavad Geeta he will be born again and again as Dharma declines? "Yadaa yadaa hi dharmasya glaanir bhavati Bhaarata | abhyuttaanam-adharmasya tad-aatmaanam Srijamyaham". He was silent on all previous avataars in Bhagavadgeeta and so did not explain why five avataraas were needed in Krita Yuga. Arjuna belonged to the clan of Dushyanta's son of Puru clan and so was addressed as Bhaarata in the sloka.

 
In Ramaayana Ayodhyaa Kaanda Rama says: "Buddhyaana-yaivam-vidhayaa charantam sunaastikam dharmapataadapetam | yathaa hi Choerah sa tathaa hi buddhastathaagatam naastikamatra viddhi | tasmaaddhi yah sakyatamah prajaanaam sa naastike naabhimukhoe budhah syaat ||" (Canto CIX—slokas 33-34)--It is a well-known fact that a follower of Buddha (condemning Vedas) deserves to be punished in the same way as a thief (inasmuch as a heretic robs people of their faith); and know an unbeliever (a follower of the Chaarvaaka or materialistic school of philosophy) to be on a par with Bauddha. Therefore (among such unbelievers) he who is most tamable should undoubtedly be so punished in the interest of the people; in no other case should a wise man (even) stand face to face with an unbeliever (but should shun him)."

 
Now my question is who is this Nastik Bauddha (Atheist Buddha) in Tretaayuga? How can he then rise to the status of Dasaavataara? Was Jayadeva wiser then in including Historic Buddha instead of Nastik Bauddha? Then who is that Bauddha of Kaliyuga in Bhagavata? Would it not be safer then to avoid Buddha altogether and include Jina? We can follow Vedanta Desika's recommendation without Buddha instead of Jayadeva's recommendations Then how can we justify two Avataaras at the same time? Is it not the reason Jayadeva made Krishna Jagannatha and removed him from the list? Logics call for inclusion of Jina instead of Buddha and not Balarama. We can continue also with the same justification for Jina's Avataara like that of Buddha. But orthodox view will stick to "tasmaat Saastram pramaanam te" as Lord Krishna said in Bhagavadgeeta, "When in doubt follow Sastras". In their opinion Bhaagavata Purana is a saastra and that has mentioned Bauddha in Dasaavatara. Here we can have support from Vedanta Desika who defined his list of Dasaavatara. Logical grouping would be Balarama, Rishabha and Krishna removing Buddha and Parasurama in the Dasaavataara list. Parasurama and Rama were together in Tretayuga; So Krishna and Balarama could be together in Dwaaparayuga. In Vishnu Sahasranama Halayuda is one of the names of Mahavishnu (Sloka 60; Vanamaalee Halaayudhah). Even today in India the farmers repeat Balarama's name while ploughing for a successful cultivation and profitable harvest. Jayadeva called his eighth avataara as Balabhadra.
Halaayudha means one who has the plough as his weapon. But some saint like Vedanta Desika should do this regrouping as they are all avataaras of Vishnu from Bhaagavata Purana. I can't do it by my logistics and writings.

 
Pondering over these thoughts I thought for the present I should go in line with the current thoughts of Hinduism and stick to my ideas on Divine Incarnations as narrated in my earlier discourse. I also thought it is best to concentrate on that ONE supreme Spirit mentioned in the early periods of Rigveda as mentioned in Naasadeeya Sookta whenever I attend any temple or pray to any deity and wait for the dawn of the great saint who would unfold the mythological mysteries about the Dasaavataara's Composition as well as the number of Avataaras that took place whenever Dharma declined to the lowest level. I can then without getting into the controversy decide whom I should include in my prayers in Dasaavataara Stotra and whom not. Recently His Holiness Chandrasekhara Bharati said: "All religious conflicts and quarrels arise because a devotee is unable to disassociate his conception of God from a particular name and form". Why then to worry on Puraanic Avataara controversies to find the names and forms of God in Dasaavataaras of Vishnu?

 

 
Considerable help has been taken from the following publications in preparing this discourse as supplement to my earlier lecture on Divine Incarnations:
  1. Ramachandra Rao, Vishnu-Kosha and Gita Kosha, Sharada Peetham, Sringeri, Bangalore, India.
  2. Swami Harshanda, Hindu Gods and Goddesses, Ramakrishna Math, Chennai, India
  3. Devdutt Pattanik, Vishnu, Vakil, Feffer and Simons Ltd., Mumbai, India.
  4. Champaka Lakshmi, The Hindu Temple, Roli Books, New Delhi, India
  5. Chandrsekharaanada Saraswathi, Dharma, Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan, Mumbai, India.
  6. Vishnu, Hinduism's Blue–Skinned Savior Exposition, Frist Center, Nashville, TN., April-May 2011
  7. N. R. Srinivasan, Discourse on Selected Vedic Manras from Mahanarayana Upanishad, Sri Ganesha Temple, Nashville, TN, USA.

HR FORUM E-MAILS ON HINDU-JAIN INTERFAITH TO PARTICIPANTS


 
HISTORICALLY JAINISM AND HINDUISM   CONFLATE ARISING OUT OF SANATANA DHARMA

It all started with four Manasa putras in Purans which was subsequently raised to seven Rishis. You see similar pattern in Buddhism and Jainism.  Number of Buddhas started with four and increased to seven and ended with 50 or 51 like 51 Sakti peethas in Hinduism.   Jainism also started with 4 Tirthankaras, raised to seven and ultimately raised 24 to coincide with 24 names of Vishnu we use in  Sandhyavandana or 24 Gayatri Syllables of Vedic period, in the early centuries around second century AD. Nirgranthas were an old sect at the time of Buddha and Naataputta only reformer of the Jain monastery could have been founded  earlier by Parsvanatha.

According to Jain tradition Rishabha who belonged to Ikshvaku family of Ayodhya was the founder of Jainism. In fact at that time the word religion was not known to anybody and everything was Dhrama   and later the followers of his teachings named the religion after him as Jainism derived from his title  Jina the conqueror of samsara. His parents were Nabhiraja and Marudevi. Their son was Bharata after whom India was called Bharatavarsha. Rishbha was the first Jina when people were primitive, illiterate and did not know any art or craft. It was during his period the institution of marriage, cremation, building symmetries festivals (like sakshaya Triteeya) in honor of Indra and Nagas came up. Thus he was the pioneer in the Human progress.

Vedic Guru paid reverence to Rishabha and regarded him as Chakravarthy  or Saarvabhauma and regarded him as Lord of Lords.  Taittareeya Aranyaka   mentions of Vaatarasanas who have been named as Sramanas by Jains. Vaatarasans have been glorified and have been honored with the title Kesi. (Krishna is addressed as Kesava). This Kesi alludes to Rishabha in Jain literature, Kesi who is seen with locks of hair. In Rigveda Kesi has been mentioned along with Rishabha.  There is also, may be metaphorically, reference to Rishabha (meaning the bull as Arjuna was often addressed  as Bharatarshabha)  in Vraatyakhanda of Atharva Veda.  It is therefore presumed Rishabha   belongs to pre-Vedic period or early Vedic period and was the fountain head of Sramana culture. It is from this contest of Rigveda that Lord Rishabha has been portrayed as one who sponsored Vaatarasana Sramanas in the Bhagavata Purana.  There is however no mention anywhere that Rishabha was the founder of   Jain religion. Like Manu he has been named as the first runner and founder of the new social order of Dharma.

Arishtanemi is mentioned in Kalpasutra as 22nd Tirrthankara, son of Samudravijaya of Sauripura on the banks of the river Yamuna.  He was named  Neminatha  because  his mother had  seen in the dream  a Nemi,  outer rim   of a wheel (may be Dharma chakra) which consisted of rishta stones flying up to sky connecting heaven  and earth symbolically.  It is believed that Neminatha had is Nirvana in Girinaar.

Unfortunately the wording Jainism was not in existence till   Sri Mahaveera became the 24th  t Thirthankara. Before him there were 23 Thirthankaras. The present teachings of Mahveera is actually more structured. The previous Thirthankaras has in common practicing and preaching the same principle with a different way.

According to Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, a professor of comparative religions and philosophy at Oxford who later became the second President of India, there is evidence to show that Ṛishabhadeva, the first Tīrthaṅkara, was being worshiped by the first century BC. The Yajurveda  mentions the name of three Tīrthaṅkaras – Ṛishabha, Ajitanatha and Arishtanemi, states Radhakrishnan, and "the Bhāgavata Purāṇa endorses the view that Ṛishbha as the founder of Jainism". The name Arishtanemi appears in the Shantimantra of Mundakopanishad which Hindu scholars translate as one who dispels untoward things happening to us, meaning Supreme Being.

Chhandogya Upanishad  mentions  Krishna  as son of Devaki as a disciple of Ghora Angirasa  who instructed Lord Krishna a on Tapas (austerity), Dana (Charity), Arjavam (simplicity), Ahimsa( (Non-violence)  and Sartyavachana (Truthfulness). Jainism mentions Krishna as a contemporary  of Arishtanemi Tirthankara who is the fore-runner of Parsvanatha.  Some identify Ghora Angirasa with Neminatha.  Neminatha is also known to have instructed Sri  Krishna but his identity with  Ghora Angirasa seems to be not right since Jainism does not identify Ghora Angirasa  with Neminatha. However this has helped in boosting up the image of Jainism and making it popular.  Whether Krishna and Neminatha are historical or not is anybody’s guess!

The word Sramana can be found in Upanishads.  Mundaka Upanishad mentions about shaven head Sanyasis. In Rigveda Arhama has been traced to Sramana leader—“Oh Arhama,  you fed compassion  to this useless world”

According to Jain beliefs, Neminatha is the cousin of Lord Krishna and his iconography includes the same conch as found with Vishnu.    Vaishnavites believe in Pada-puja (Charanam Pavitram)   like Jains. He was born at  Sauripura (Dwaraka) in the Yadu lineage, like Krishna.  His birth date is the 5th day of Shravana Shukla (July 28 Garuda Panchami day in 2017) in the Hindu calendar. He herded cattle and became fond of animals.  According to Jain mythology, on his wedding day Neminatha heard the cries of animals being killed for the marriage feast, and moved by the sorrow he renounced the world – a scene found in many Jain artwork. He attained moksha on Girnar Hills near Junagadh, a pilgrimage center for Jains.   According to Long, the Jain legends state that Neminatha taught Krishna the knowledge that he shared with Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita, a historic reason that has led Jains to accept, read and cite the Bhagavad Gita as a spiritually important text, celebrate Krishna related festivals and intermingle with Hindus as spiritual cousins. For Hindu Americans like me this is no problem.  Many Jains silently visit Hindu American Temples in the absence of Jain temples and enjoy all worships without any reservation like Sikhs. Buddhist Indians insist on Buddha sanctum unlike broad-minded Jains. They will not feel guilty if they accept Venkateshawara or Jaganntha as Jain Tirthankara!

On being taunted by Satyabhama, the wife of Krishna, Neminatha blew Panchajanya, the mighty conch of Krishna. According to Jain texts, no one could lift Vishnu's conch except Krishna, let alone blow it. After this event, Jain Puranas state that Krishna decided to test Neminatha's strength and challenged him for a friendly duel. Neminatha, being a Tirthankara, defeated Krishna without any effort.  In the war between Krishna and Jarasandha, Neminatha participated alongside Krishna. Neminatha's marriage was arranged with Rajulakumari or Rajimati, the daughter of King Ugrasena of Dwaraka. According to Jain legends, Neminatha heard the animal cries as they were beings slaughtered for the marriage feast. He was taken by sorrow that his marriage is the cause of so much pain, gave up the idea of getting married, became monk and went to Mount Girnar to lead a mendicant's life.   Sometimes, as with Vishnu's iconography, a chakra is also shown near him, as in the 6th-century sculpture found at the archeological site near Padhavali (Madhya Pradesh). There is the  largest statue of Neminath with a  height of 16 meters at Tirumalai built in 12th century.  

I do not find anywhere Neminatha being mentioned as Sanat Kumara. But I believe I may not be too wrong if I conclude Neminatha as Sanat Kumara as Skanda.    Esoteric tradition says Sanat Kumara was born as Pradyumna to Rukmini. Pancharatra Vyuha concept considers Krishna as   Paravasudeva,  Sankarshana or Balarama  as Brahma the creator , Aniruddha as Vishnu, the sustainer  and Pradyumna   as Siva the destroyer.  Jayadeva also excludes Krishna as an avatar and says he is Jagannatha. Coming out of Siva’s potency Sanat Kumara is only emanation of Siva or volute of Parabrahman. I am therefore not surprised that Neminatha,   Skanda and Venkaateshwara are all the same  hailed as Holy Son in Christianity that is  Sanat Kumara Eternal Youth son of Brahma, Vishnu as well as Siva at different times. In worshiping Venkateshwara as Universal Lord we have the Unity and wisdom of “Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam”

Venkataadri samam sthaanam  brahmaande  naasti kanchana | Venkatesa sama devo na bhooto na bhavishyati || There is no place equal to Venkataadri in the whole Universe! A God equal to Venkatesa has never been born nor will be!  GOD equal to Venkatesha has never been in the past, nor is at present, and neither will be in the future”. 
 uinduis
Dr. David Frawley states: I urge the young people and the scholars of India to take up this cause (of Universal Oneness). Do not try to define India in the context of civilization as defined by the West. Instead look to the great traditions of India that have their own deeper roots and use it to critique Western civilization and discover its limitations. Rather than seeking to define and control India according to Western perspectives, the West should look to India for guidance on the deeper issues of culture and spirituality. Indians, in turn, should assert their own greater traditions and not simply imitate the West or seek to justify Indian civilization from a Western perspective. True scholars of the Indic tradition need not go to Harvard or Oxford to seek credibility, rather these institutions should come to them. What is the Indic school of thought, one might ask? It is not at all something new or unknown. It is the great spiritual, philosophical, scientific, artistic and cultural traditions of the subcontinent that are among the largest and oldest in the world. It is the emphasis on dharma, on karma, on pluralism and synthesis, on yoga sadhana and moksha. It is not only the tradition of ancient sages from the Vedas and Upanishads to Buddhist (Jains are even older) and Yoga traditions but also modern teachers like Sri Aurobindo and Swami Vivekananda. It is not only the vast literature of Sanskrit but also that of the regional languages and dialects of the subcontinent, most of which have older literary traditions than the languages of Europe such as English.

 Comments received

Thank you very much for your excellent article on Jainism which will dispel some of the misconceptions about Jainism of many of your readers. Hopefully this makes aware   of every one to be more open minded to the faith of every religion.

-- Dr Brahm Parsh, Nashville, TN
--July 12, 2017
NEMINATHA IS VEM-KAT-ESWARA, UNIVERSAL LORD WHO REDEEMS US FROM SINS
According to Jain beliefs, Neminatha is the cousin of Lord Krishna and his iconography includes the same conch as found with Vishnu.   Vaishnavites believe in Pada-puja (Charanam Pavitram)   like Jains. He was born at Sauripura (Dwaraka) in the Yadu lineage, like Krishna.  His birth date is the 5th day of Shravana Shukla (July 28 Garuda Panchmi day in 2017) in the Hindu calendar. He herded cattle and became fond of animals.  According to Jain mythology, on his wedding day Neminatha heard the cries of animals being killed for the marriage feast, and moved by the sorrow he renounced the world – a scene found in many Jain artwork. He attained moksha on Girnar Hills near Junagadh, a pilgrimage center for Jains which I visited.  According to Long, the Jain legends state that Neminatha taught Krishna the knowledge that he shared with Arjuna in the Bhagavad Gita, a historic reason that has led Jains to accept, read and cite the Bhagavad Gita as a spiritually important text, celebrate Krishna related festivals and intermingle with Hindus as spiritual cousins. For Hindu Americans like me this is no problem.  Many Jains silently visit Hindu American Temples in the absence of Jain temples and enjoy all worships without any reservation like Sikhs. Buddhist Indians insist on Buddha sanctum unlike broad-minded Jains. They will not feel guilty if they accept Venkateshawara or Jaganntha as Jain Tirthankara!

On being taunted by Satyabhama, the wife of Krishna, Neminatha blew Panchajanya, the mighty conch of Krishna. According to Jain texts, no one could lift Vishnu's conch except Krishna, let alone blow it. After this event, Jain Puranas state that Krishna decided to test Neminatha's strength and challenged him for a friendly duel. Neminatha, being a Tirthankara, defeated Krishna without any effort.  In the war between Krishna and Jarasandha, Neminatha participated alongside Krishna. Neminatha's marriage was arranged with Rajulakumari or Rajimati, the daughter of King Ugrasena of Dwaraka. According to Jain legends, Neminatha heard the animal cries as they were beings slaughtered for the marriage feast. He was taken by sorrow that his marriage is the cause of so much pain, gave up the idea of getting married, became monk and went to Mount Girnar to lead a mendicant's life.   Sometimes, as with Vishnu's iconography, a chakra is also shown near him, as in the 6th-century sculpture found at the archeological site near Padhavali (Madhya Pradesh) There is the  largest statue of Neminath with height of 16 meters at Tirumalai built in 12th century.  

 In the light of the above I am   bound to believe Lord Venkateshwara,  about whom many mysteries surround, should have also been worshiped as  Neminatha though orthodox Hindus  particularly Vaishnavites may vehemently protest with all sorts of  counter arguments. I have also brought to your attention Jain Ramayana. I am therefore not surprised Hindu Temples in America often include Vardhamana  in a separate sanctum of Multi –Traditional Hindu complex. I also find in Hindu temples American Jains joining the worship with no mental reservation.   I also strongly believe Jainism is  closer to Hinduism than Buddhism. It is a pity that Buddha is considered as an Avatar of Vishnu but not Adinatha. I am also surprised why American Hindu temples have not considered to install non-controversial icon of either Adinatha or Neminatha based on history instead of the 24th Tirthankara  Mahavir Vardhamana.  I was also surprised that Esoteric Sanat Kumara Tradition does not talk much about Jainism.  I believe Hindus were more afraid of Buddhism than peaceful Jainism and hence made him an avatar. American Hindus   being more focused on Spirituality and Universal One-ness can bring back Jainism to Hindu Dharma fold if not Hindu Religion in their ambition to bring Universal Oneness about which Vivekananda dreamed  and promote spirituality the country needs today.  American Hindus should be more inclined to Hindu Dharma than sectarian Hindu Religion. It will be equally important and logical for Jains to openly and freely participate in Hindu worship accepting both Jagannatha and Venkateshwara as their Tirthankara based on the past history. I have already made a reference to this in my discourse on Jagannatha.  I felt reluctant to include any reference to Jainism in my discourse on Venkateshwara previously. I am planning to add the following paragraph to my discourse.Hindus often decided religious disputes in courts and agreements, Fighting factions of Srivaishnavas went to Privy Council in UK to decide which Namam Kanchipuram should have during British days!

“There is an original    agreement between Jains and Vaishnavas in 14th century stating that Jains have to leave Thirumala Neminath temple to Vaishnavas and Vaishnavas will not destroy Shravanabelagola Bahubali statue as a good gesture.  Otherwise the agreement says King Bukkaraya (one of the founder of Vijayanagar Empire?) will punish all Jains in his kingdom.   (Source: An old inscription named Bukkaraya Sandhi is available with archeological department   of Karnataka now preserved in the Central Library of Bengaluru.—Wikipedia). Since Sanat Kumara is so much glorified in Buddhism it is reasonable to believe he was also popular with Jainism and that the statue of Venkateswara was once believed to be that of Neminatha and also worshipped by Jains. Knowing the history of Puri Jagannth under the rule of Jain Kings I am inclined to believe in the story. Many Jains embraced   Vaishanvism during Ramnuja’s time.”

Any suggestion with proper reference is welcome. You may be interested to know Parthasarathy in Chennai is also worshiped as Venkata Krishnan who as Krishna is acceptable to Jains as well as Hindus like Sanat Kumara for all traditions, religions and philosophies. Venkateswara is also addressed as Krishna by some.

 Recently a group of American Jains migrated from India rushed to White House to establish their existence as a minority Religion. It will be mutually beneficial if they join together with American Hindus to spread Hindu Dharma or Sanatana Dharma from which Jains parted in the past and celebrate Diwali together in White House   which is common to both. There are no conflicts between Hindu Dharma and Jain Dharma. Hindus should also outreach Jains by installing Neminatha in Hindu Temples and worshiping Him or promote the concept of Venkateswara as Neminatha. It is a two-way approach which is already in Vogue in Hindu American Temples today.
--July 11, 2017

 



COMMENTS RECEIVED 
Thank you for your beautiful explanation of how Jainism and Hinduism are interrelated and have many things in common because of their common believes in many aspect. 

However there are some misconception about some aspects of Jainism. Only in the last half a century, because of some of extreme archeological work up many  archeologist including famous 
Foreign archeologist, lot of new information about the origin and historical aspect of Jainism has been updated and is accepted by the so called historians  and philosophers including our demised ex president of India Dr. Radha Krishnan.  Even in Vedas also has clearly mentioned about Jainism. Unfortunately the wording Jainism was not in existence till   Sri Mahaveera became the 24 th Thirthankara. Before him there were 23 Thirthankaras. The present teachings of Mahveera is actually more structured. The previous Thirthankaras has in common practicing and preaching the same principle with a different way.  It is very difficult for me to explain and discuss all this in few lines. Hope fully one of these days when I get chance to meet you in person, would like share with you more about Jainism. 
Thank you for your interest in Jainism which is actually a way of life.
 Jai Jinendra.
--Dr. Brahm Parsh

 
Buddha and the Veda

Subhash Kak

Oct 4, 2018

A panorama of scenes from the Buddha’s life (Wikipedia)
The layperson believes that whereas the Veda accepts the idea of the ātman (translated into English as “Self”), which is both immanent and transcendent, Buddhism does not. Indeed, in the popular imagination the Buddha promoted the doctrine of anātman or anatta, and he took the ground stuff of reality to be nothing, what came to be called śūnyatā or emptiness. Generally speaking, the recognition of the three doctrines of anatta, the absence of self, anicca (Skt. anitya, impermanence), and dukkha (suffering) as three characteristics of all existence (tri-lakṣaṇa), constitute “right understanding” in Buddhism.
The Self-Noself dichotomy means that the philosophical foundations of Hinduism and Buddhism are different. In Hinduism, consciousness (ātman) is primary and at the analytical level it is different from matter. In Buddhism, on the other hand, consciousness is a phenomenon that emerges on the ground of the body although it survives in the chain of influences it engenders. As an aside, both these doctrines are under consideration in modern science’s quest to define consciousness.
Therefore, it will surprise many that this dichotomy of ātman versus anātman was declared false by the Buddha on his last day of life. He said:
“The Self (ātman) is reality (tattva), the Self is permanent (nitya), the Self is virtue (guṇa), the Self is eternal (śāśvatā), the Self is stable (dhruva), and the Self is auspiciousness (śiva).”
Other adjectives used by the Buddha for the Self are “sovereign” (aiśvarya), “unchanging” (avipariṇāma), and “true” (satya).
These are precisely the “attributes” associated with the Self (ātman) in the Vedas. The attribute aiśvarya implies agency and brings to mind Īśvara, or Śiva. Īśvara is the free mind who has access to “transcendental knowing” or lokkottara-jñāna, which explains how Śiva-Maheśvara was integrated into worship in many parts of the Buddhist world.
Quite like the term āvaraṇa (covering) hiding the Self from the mind, the Buddha speaks of many kleśas (mental and moral afflictions) preventing one from seeing the Self.
He suggests that the doctrine of Noself was advanced by him as an upāya to get his followers off from attachment to old ideas. But now they were attached to impermanence and emptiness, and so before he left the world he wished to reveal the secret doctrine of the Self.
He gave the Self or the ātman the name tathāgatagarbha, “thus-arrived-nature” (svabhāva of beings), or the buddhadhātu, “ground-state-of-illumination”. Just as the Veda speaks of a churning between avidyā (world as materiality) and vidyā (world as cognition) to obtain deep knowledge of the Self, the Buddha spoke of a churning between emptiness and non-emptiness.
The need for both avidyā and vidyā for knowledge is most beautifully expressed in the Īśa Upaniṣad as follows:
विद्यां चाविद्यां च यस्तद्वेदोभयँ सह |
अविद्यया मृत्युं तीर्त्वा विद्ययाऽमृतमश्नुते ॥ ११॥ ईशोपनिषत्
vidyāṃ cāvidyāṃ ca yastadvedobhayaṃ saha |
avidyayā mṛtyuṃ tīrtvā vidyayā’mṛtamaśnute ||
He who knows both vidyā and avidyā together,|crosses death through avidyā and through vidyā attains immortality. ||
It is significant that both elements are essential. Elsewhere, I have described intuition as the flight of the mind where the two wings are vidyā and avidyā.
Buddha’s Parinirvāṇa
The circumstances under which Śākyamuni Buddha died and his last sermon are described in the Pali Mahāparinibbāna-suttanta and the Mahāyāna Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra (MPNS) (or just the Nirvāṇa Sūtra), the latter of which is a much more substantial text in which the Buddha goes into the very heart of the teachings that had been taught earlier by him.
We find the eighty-year old Buddha unwell. He and his entourage are in transit to the town of Kuśinagara in the land of the Mallas, where in the outskirts he lays down between a pair of sal trees, announcing his impending death. Hearing of this, throngs assemble. Amongst them is Cunda, an artisan from the town. He and others get down on their right knees and address the Buddha entreating him to stay longer in this world. The Buddha reminds Cunda:
All created things
Have impermanent nature
Having come into existence, they do not last
Tranquil extinction is bliss
But Cunda presents many arguments why the teaching of emptiness was not going to give them comfort and words like nirvāṇa — or even the non-nirvāṇa — of the Tathāgata seemed contradictory and difficult to understand. This prompts the Buddha to eventually reveal the secret doctrine of the ātman.
The MPNS is one of the most important scriptures in the Buddhist canon and in the fifth century two translations based on two different Sanskrit texts were produced, one by the famed traveler Faxian (418CE); and the other longer “Northern version” by Dharmakṣema in 422 CE. There is also a later Tibetan version (c 790CE).
The Buddha had used emptiness to help his disciples separate themselves from earlier attachments. He explains the supersession of the Nonself doctrine by the Self doctrine with this parable:
Consider the story of mother whose infant son is ill. The physician gives her medicine for the boy with the instruction “After the child takes the medicine, do not give him your milk until he has fully digested the medicine.” The mother smears a bitter-tasting substance on her breasts and tells her young child that the breasts have poison on them. Having heard this, the child pulls away from her when he is hungry. But after the medicine has been ingested, the mother washes her breasts and calls out to her son, “Come and I shall give you milk.”
The Veda is the mother’s milk that the Buddha did not allow his disciples to partake until they had purified themselves with the austere message of emptiness.
Mahāparinirvāṇa-sūtra in China
I conclude with a last word on Dharmakṣema, the translator of MPNS into Chinese, who was a great celebrity of his times. He was born in Central India, and he received instruction from several teachers. This was the golden age of transmission of Buddhist texts to China, and to seek fame and fortune he went to Central Asia. At first he lived for several years in Dunhuang, busy with his work. But the city was conquered by the Northern Liang king Juqu Mengxun, who took Dharmakṣema with him to his capital Guzang in 421 and installed him as teacher, court advisor and translator of Sanskrit sutras.
By the mid-twenties, Juqu’s overlord Tuoba Tao, the emperor of Wei, having heard of Dharmakṣema’s fame wanted him, but Juqu resisted. To ease the pressure, Dharmakṣema was sent to India to acquire more texts. But when he returned after a couple of years, Tuoba Tao repeated his demand and threatened to invade Guzang.
But Juqu Mengxun did not want to give up Dharmakṣema, so as a way to solve this problem and appease his overlord Tuoba Tao, he decided to kill him. Dharmakṣema was murdered in 433, when he was forty-eight years old.
 
 

Teachings of Rishabha From Srimad Bhagavata Purana

 
Teachings of Rishabha is found in the chapters 4, 5 and 6 of Skandha V of Srimad Bhagavata Purana.

Your pursuit should be the pursuit of the only knowledge worthwhile; the knowledge of Brahman.
Surrender yourself to the Lord. Dedicate your actions to Him. Listen to stories about Him and keep the company of the devotees of the Lord.
Hate no one because everyone is an image of the Lord.
Share the pain of others.
Control anger.
Be alone with yourselves whenever you can because solitude helps you to think of the Lord.
Do your duties properly. Do not neglect any of them.
Speak sparingly and think more.


Six facts about Jainism in India  

Jainism is one of the world’s oldest religions, originating in India at least 2,500 years ago. The spiritual goal of Jainism is to become liberated from the endless cycle of rebirth and to achieve an all-knowing state called moksha. This can be achieved by living a nonviolent life, or ahimsa, with as little negative impact on other life forms as possible. 

The traditions of Jainism were largely carried forward by a succession of 24 Tirthankaras, or teachers, most notably Vardhamana Mahavira, the last of the Tirthankaras and likely a contemporary of Gautama Buddha. Both Mahavira and Buddha emphasized the importance of self-discipline, meditation and ascetic life as the key to salvation. Their teachings often stood in contrast to those of Vedic priests of the time who emphasized ritual practices and their own role as intermediaries between humanity and the gods. 


Today, a sliver of India’s population (0.4%) identifies as Jain, making it the smallest of the country’s six major religious groups after Hinduism, Islam, Christianity, Sikhism and Buddhism. Indians overall know very little about this ancient religion and its practices, according to a June 2021 Pew Research Center report based on a survey of nearly 30,000 Indians. Here are six facts about Jains in India, from the report. 


How we did this 

Jains are concentrated in India’s West, largely in Maharashtra. Despite Jainism’s historic origins in India’s Eastern region, few Jains remain in the East. The changes in the regional concentration of Jains are believed to have started around 300 B.C.E. when Jains began migrating to the West, possibly in search of more favorable kingdoms. Today, 4% of the population of Mumbai – the capital of Maharashtra and the commercial and business center of India – identifies as Jain. 

Jains are more highly educated and wealthier than Indians overall, and few identify as lower caste. Roughly a third (34%) of Jain adults have at least a college degree, compared with 9% of the general public, according to India’s 2011 census. Moreover, the vast majority of Jains fall into India’s top wealth quintiles, according to India’s National Family and Health Survey. 


Wealth and education in India are inextricably linked with caste. Jains are the only religious group in India where a majority say they are members of a higher General Category caste. Most Indians (68%) are members of lower castes (Scheduled Castes, Scheduled Tribes or Other Backwards Classes), compared with 20% of Jains who identify with these communities. 


Almost all Jains are vegetarian, in line with guidance to pursue ahimsa (not harming other life). Roughly nine-in-ten Indian Jains (92%) identify as vegetarian, and two-thirds of Jains (67%) go further by abstaining from root vegetables such as garlic and onion. Eating root vegetables is seen as a form of violence in Jain teachings because consuming the root of a plant destroys the plant in its entirety. These dietary practices extend outside the home; more than eight-in-ten Jain vegetarians also say they would not eat food in the home of a friend or neighbor who was non-vegetarian (84%) or in a restaurant that served non-vegetarian food (91%). 


Jains feel they have a lot in common with Indian Hindus. Despite theological differences between Jain and Hindu teachings – for instance, Hinduism teaches that the universe was created, but Jainism does not – the two religions share many similarities in their teachings and practices. For example, both religions teach about karma, and roughly three-quarters of both Jains (75%) and Hindus (77%) say they believe in karma. (Karma is often understood as the idea that humans will eventually reap the benefits of their good deeds and pay the price for their bad deeds, often in their next life, though survey respondents were not offered a definition.) 


Moreover, when asked whether Jains and Hindus in India have a lot in common or are very different, about two-thirds of Jains (66%) say that the two communities have a lot in common. 


However, that feeling is not fully reciprocated. Just 19% of Hindus see a lot of commonality with Jains. One reason for this mismatch may be that Jains tend to know more about Hindus – who make up 81% of the Indian population – than vice versa. Three-in-ten Jains say they know “a great deal” about the Hindu religion and its practices, while just 3% of Hindus say they know a lot about Jainism. 


Like many Indians, Jains tend to prefer living separately from other religious and caste groups. While nearly all Jains (92%) say they would be willing to accept a Hindu neighbor, significantly fewer say they would be willing to accept a Muslim (38%), Christian (46%), Sikh (55%) or Buddhist (58%) in the area where they live. Moreover, large majorities of Indian Jains say it is important to stop both women (82%) and men (81%) from marrying into other religious groups. And despite making up a small share of the national population, nearly three-quarters of Jains say that all or most of their close friends are also Jain (72%). 


These attitudes are not uncommon in India – majorities of Hindus also oppose religious intermarriage – and may in part be tied to Jains’ particular demographic makeup. For example, while a majority of Jains identify as members of the higher General Category castes, Buddhists in India overwhelmingly identify as Dalits, or members of the lower Scheduled Castes. In fact, Jains are much more likely than other Indians to say that they would not accept a member of a Scheduled Caste as a    neighbor (41% vs. 21% nationally). Moreover, large majorities of Jains say it is important to stop both women (79%) and men (74%) in their community from marrying into other castes. 


Dietary preferences may also play a role in Jain attitudes about other groups; unlike Jains, most Muslims and Christians in India, for example, say they are not vegetarian. 


Politically, Jains lean toward the country’s ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP). Seven-in-ten Jains say they feel closest to the BJP, while just 8% say they feel closest to the Indian National Congress (INC), the main opposition party. In fact, Jains are more likely than other religious communities in India, including Hindus, to feel political affinity with the BJP: Fewer than half of Hindus (44%) say they feel closest to the BJP, a party that some say promotes a Hindu nationalist agenda. 


Jains’ political preference for the BJP may in part be tied to their views on religion and national identity, which in some ways reflect Hindu nationalist sentiments more akin to their Hindu compatriots than other minority communities in India. A significant share of Jains (44%) say being Hindu is very important to truly being Indian, as do a majority of Hindus (64%). Among other religious groups, far fewer people share this view, including just 21% of Sikhs. A slim majority of Jains (54%) also tie authentic Indian identity with speaking the Hindi language, one of the dozens of languages spoken in India. Among Hindus, these sentiments are closely associated with support for the BJP. Topics Beliefs & Practices Other Religions 


SHARE THIS LINK: 

Kelsey Jo Starr is a research analyst focusing on religion at Pew Research:   HTTPS://WWW.PEWRESEARCH.ORG/FACT-TANK/2021/08/17/6-FACTS-ABOUT-JAINISM-IN-INDIA