Monday, January 31, 2022

The Life and Work of Sri Sankara

 

The Life and Work of Sri Sankara by Prof. P. Sankara-narayanan

(Sharing this with HRF Participants through discourse and E-mails by N.R. Srinivasan, Nashville, TN, USA)

"Among the renowned personalities celebrated in the hagiographies of the world, by far the most distinguished for all time is Sri Sankara, reverently referred to as Sri Sankara Bhagavatpada, or simply as the Bhagavatpada. Whether considered, as tradition and the Puranas would have it, as an incarnation of Lord Siva Himself or only looked upon as a surpassing human being, either way, he is pre-eminent among the prophets and religious leaders of all times. His achievements during the little over three decades of his earthly life constitute a marvel of uncommon rate.

He was an intellectual prodigy who attained a phenomenal mastery over the scriptures even when he was less than eight years of age. Using the Sanskrit language with a felicitous clarity all his own, he wrote elaborate commentaries on the tripod of Hindu religion and philosophy evincing a dialectical skill which even to this day is the despair and envy of his adversaries. The original treatises that he produced on Advaita Vedanta ranging from a single verse to a thousand for all grades of mental comprehension live even today as fresh as ever, in the thoughts and tongues of men. His triumphal digvijaya to all parts of our land more than once had a double purpose, to vindicate the truths of Advaita Vedanta against the onslaughts of its disputants and to purify our religious theories and practices out of the accretions that had gathered round them by the lapse of time and the inroads of perverted minds. Mere sacerdotalism which went by the letter ignoring the spirit and the corruption of designing people had for long fouled the clear springs of our pristine religion, resulting in the adoption of ways of worship which were neither civilized nor moral. All this had happened before Sri Sankara came on the scene. He accomplished the stupendous task of ridding our religion of its unfortunate excrescence and raised it to a pedestal of worshipful dignity. Buddhism, the rebel child of the Vedic religion and philosophy, denied God and the soul, laid the axe at the very roots of Vedic thought and posed a great danger to its very survival. This onslaught was stemmed betimes, compelling Buddhism to seek refuge in other lands. While the credit for this should go primarily to the Mimamsaka, Kumarila Bhatta, it was because of Sri Sankara's dialectical skill and irrefutable arguments that it ceased to have sway over the minds of the inheritors of Vedic religion.

Having thus enthroned our ancient religion and philosophy in the hearts and minds of his countrymen, Sri Sankara established in several parts of the country guardians of his teachings to preserve and propagate it to countless generations of the future. While these should have been numerous when he established them, five stand to this day as pontificates bearing his name, and function at Kanchi, Sringeri, Puri, Dwaraka and Badri, covering the whole of Bharata Varsha. There is not in legend or in history a life like Sri Sankara's so short in years and yet so packed with achievements in the realm of the spirit and whose glory extends beyond the bounds of space and time. No wonder that even today, much as protagonists of other schools may regret and protest, Vedanta is identified with Advaita which Sri Sankara drew out of the Upanishads, distilled out of the Bhagavad Gita and described in his commentaries on the Brahma Sutras, and that this school of Vedanta has compelled the conviction and obtained the assent of the thinking minds of the West.

II

It is unfortunate that no biography of Sri Sankara was written by his contemporaries. For details about his life, we have to depend on Sankara Vijayas composed at different times long after he lived. They do not agree in all particulars about his life. The traditional date of Sri Sankara varies from that assigned to him by modern historians. While the latter fix him as having lived from 788 to 820 A.D., the tradition determined by the pontifical succession in the celebrated Pithas that he established take him to a time long before the Christian era. Be that as it may, we may glean from the different biographies extant today a generally accepted account of his life and work.

It is agreed on all hands that Sri Sankara belonged to a Nambudiri Brahmana family of Kerala in the hamlet of Kaladi situated on the banks of the Churna river. His father was a pious wealthy person called Sivaguru and his mother was Aryamba. Not blessed with a son for a long time, the devout pair went to worship Lord Siva in the nearby celebrated temple at Trichur. The story goes that, pleased by their devotion, the God appeared before them in a dream and asked them to choose between a number of long-lived sons who would remain ignorant and stupid and one who would live for eight years only, but would be possessed of phenomenal intellectual gifts. Sivaguru and his wife had no hesitation in choosing the latter. According to the legend, it was conveyed to them that Lord Siva Himself would condescend to be born to them.

In fullness of time, Aryamba bore a child carrying such divine marks on its person that those who beheld it proclaimed it an incarnation of Lord Siva Himself. It was given the significant name of Sankara, calculating by the season, the day and time of its birth and also as if to predict the great service the child was destined to render to the world. (Sam Karoti iti Sankarah: 'Sankara' is one who does good). As ill-luck would have it, Sivaguru passed away before the child was five years old and it was then brought up with care and affection by his mother. With the assistance of her kinsmen, Aryamba got the upanayanam ceremony performed for her precocious boy who then mastered all the Vedas and Sastras which seemed to wait on his lips, eager to be uttered by him for their own sanctification.

The eight years of the boy's allotted life were drawing to a close. The fateful day dawned. On that day it happened that Aryamba and Sri Sankara went to the Churna river to bathe. The mother finished her ablutions and was resting on the bank of the river. Suddenly she heard a cry of distress from her son telling her that a terrific crocodile had got his leg in its mouth and was dragging him down. The agony of the mother was indescribable.

 Then Sri Sankara told her that he could free himself from the grip of the monster if, then and there, he assumed the Sannyasa asrama bringing about thereby the 'death' of his former condition and the start of a new life. Else, the crocodile would devour him and that would be the end of his physical life. 'Choose' said he, 'this instant; for there is no time to lose. Shall I pass away devoured by the crocodile or shall I live converting myself into a sannyasin?' Aryamba was in a dilemma; but her maternal instinct made her consent to Sri Sankara to live as a sannyasin if thereby she could keep him alive. Then and there, standing in the water, the boy Sankara uttered the incantation which automatically admitted him into the holy order of mendicant sannyasins. And, for a wonder, the crocodile loosened its grip and disappeared from water to appear again on the sky, so the story goes, as a celestial Gandharva released from his erstwhile curse by which he was condemned to be an aquatic monster. Thus Sri Sankara 'died' as a Brahmachari at the ordained age of eight and obtained a further lease of another eight years.

Upon Aryamba quite innocently bidding her son accompany her home, Sri Sankara reminded her that he had become a sannyasin, that he had betaken to an itinerant life and must take leave of her. The mother was anguished at this, grieving as to who could take care of her son. She wailed in disappointment that it was not given to her to see her son grow up, marry and raise a progeny for the continuation of his line. Sri Sankara consoled her by saying: 'Mother dear! Do not grieve. The whole world will be my home hereafter. All those who will initiate me into the sacred lore will be my fathers. All women who give me bhiksha (alms) will be my mothers. The peace that shall be mine by the realisation of the Atman will be my consort. All my disciples will be my sons.' He however promised to be at her bedside in her last moments and speed her way to heaven by his presence. Aryamba then gave him unwilling leave to depart. Sri Sankara traveled on foot from Kaladi to the Narmada banks visiting many a sacred spot on the way. There, in a place called Omkar Mandhata on the bank of river Narmada which from then on is called Sankara Ganga, he met Govinda Bhagavatpada who formally admitted him into the sannyasin order according to the prescribed rituals and imparted the Brahma Vidya to him. After serving his guru, for some time, obeying his command. Sri Sankara went to Kasi (Varanasi) and engaged himself in writing commentaries on the tripod of Hindu philosophy, namely, the Upanishads, the Bhagavad Gita and the Brahma Sutras. At this time an interesting incident happened in the life of Sri Sankara. One morning, he was returning to his monastery after a bath in the Ganga. Leading four dogs an outcaste, who should not approach him, came along.

He was bidden by Sri Sankara to go away from his path. Upon this, the outcaste queried him as to what he bade to go away; if it was the outcaste's body or his Atman. If it was the former, he said, it was compacted of the same five elements as Sri Sankara's own body and was not different. So it need not go away. If it was the Atman, then according to the Advaita that Sri Sankara taught, the Atman of all persons, brahmana or outcaste, was one only and, being identical and all-pervasive, it cannot move away. Sri Sankara immediately understood that his questioner was no ordinary outcaste, but a realized soul and broke forth into a pentad of verses acclaiming the outcaste's greatness. Sri Sankara said in the verse that he deemed a person of such spiritual realization to be his Guru, be he an outcaste or a brahmana. According to the legend, it was Lord Siva Himself who appeared as this outcaste. The dogs were the four vedas. The outcaste and his retinue vanished and Lord Siva appeared and blessed Sri Sankara exhorting him to finish writing his commentaries.

Another incident occurred sometime later. While Sri Sankara was instructing his disciples in his Vedantic commentaries, an aged brahmana appeared before him with a request that he would be pleased to resolve some of his doubts. A vigorous discussion followed between the Master and the brahmana who disputed for a number of days with elaborate arguments Sri Sankara's interpretation of one of the tersest of the Brahma Sutras. This went on for eight days, each side vindicating its stand and there was no prospect of its conclusion. At this time, one of Sri Sankara's disciples, Padmapada by name, wondered who the doughty debater was. In an intuitive flash it struck him that he must be the great Bhagavan Vyasa, the author of the Brahma Sutras. He exclaimed: 'Sankara is Siva and Vyasa is Narayana Himself. When these gods themselves dispute, what can a mere mortal like me do?' Sri Sankara then realiszed who his disputant was. Prostrating before him he begged to be blessed. Sage Vyasa there upon lauded the fidelity of Sankara's commentaries and gave them the imprimatur of his approval. Now the extended eight years of Sri Sankara's life were about to be over. Adding another sixteen years to the span of his life, Vyasa bade him propagate the Advaita Sastra in the far reaches of India.

 

III

Then began the triumphant digvijaya of Sri Sankara. The first opponent of Advaita which is the philosophy of the Upanishads (known as the Uttaramimamsa) was the Purvamimamsaka who believed in the primacy and the immediacy of the Vedic Karmic rituals as the means to Moksha. One of the staunchest protagonists of this school was Kumarila Bhatta who lay on the banks of the Ganga at Prayag (modern Allahabad) at the point of death, having immolated himself by fire for the sin of gurudroha (being a traitor to one's Guru), which he acquired by furtively learning the tenets of Buddhism from a Buddhist savant in order to controvert them later. Kumarila, according to the legend, was an incarnation of Kumara, son of Lord Siva. He told Sri Sankara of his predicament which disabled him from debating with him. He bade him go to his own disciple, Mandana Misra living in Mahishmati, saying that he (Mandana) was a more uncompromising ritualist than himself.

Sri Sankara hastened to Mandana's place. On arriving at the city, he was at a loss to discover Mandana's house. He enquired of a woman who was passing by and was told that in the verandah of a house two parrots would be chirping between themselves whether the Vedas were true in their own right or if their truth was derived. That, she said, was Mandana's house. Arriving there, Sri Sankara found the door closed against intruders as a sraddha ceremony was being then performed by Mandana. The story is that Sri Sankara let himself in by his yogic powers. Parrying the abuses of the householder who was wroth at a sannyasin interposing himself in a sraddha ceremony, Sri Sankara said that he did not come there for anna bhiksha (alms of food) but made him agree to a vada bhiksha, (alms of knowledge) after the sraddha ceremony was over. The disputants agreed that Mandana's wife Sarasavani who was said to be an incarnation of the Goddess Sarasvati, (Mandana being Brahma himself), should act as umpire to the debate. The wager was that if either was defeated, he should adopt the asrama of the other, that is, either Sri Sankara should become a householder or Mandana should take to monastic discipline. Leaving them to debate between themselves, Sarasavani went to attend to her domestic chores. Before doing so, she adorned each disputant with a garland of flowers saying that the person whose garland showed signs of fading must be considered to have been defeated.

The debate went on for a number of days. At the conclusion of the sessions on a particular day, Sarasavani invited both of them together for bhiksha signifying that her lord Mandana had become eligible for alms as only a monk is, in other words, that he had been defeated and should, according to the wager, become a sannyasin. This he did, adopting the name Suresvara and thence forward accepted the supremacy of Advaita. He became one of the foremost disciples of Sri Sankara who had earlier, when he was in Kasi acquired a disciple in the person of Sanandana. This disciple came to be known as Padmapada because the river Ganga caused lotuses (padma) to bloom at every step of his foot (pada) to give support to him, when once in his ecstatic devotion to Sri Sankara, he walked right on the stream to fulfil a command of the master on the other bank.

IV

Sri Sankara then traveled to Badri on the Himalayas where His guru Govinda and His guru's guru Gaudapada were living in the enjoyment of nirvikalpa samadhi. He made them revert to world conscious-ness by singing the famous Dakshinamurti Stotra. He received their blessings and went to Kailas. According to the story he was affectionately received by his Great Original, Lord Paramesvara who blessed him with five Siva Sphatika Lingas, the oval emblems of Siva made of transparent crystals and a transcript of Soundaryalahari, a century of hymns in praise of the Divine Mother. As ill-luck would have it, he lost the later fifty nine of these verses which he subsequently replaced by his own composition. The five lingas given by Siva were known as Mokshalinga, Varalinga, Bhogalinga, Muktilinga and Yogalinga. Sri Sankara then returned to Kedara where he installed the Muktilinga and established one of his pontificates, in the nearby Badri, which is called the Jyotish Pitha. Proceeding thence to Nepal, he vanquished the Buddhists who denied the soul and God. He installed the Varalinga at Nilakanta Kshethra which is even now in worship at Nepal.

Wending his steps southward the Bhagavatpada went to Dwaraka in the Western corner of India, sacred to the memory of Sri Krishna. He established the Kalika Pitha there and also a pontificate. Crossing the country travelling eastward, he came to Puri where he founded the Vimala Pitha after worshipping Lord Jagannatha. Thence he went to Srisailam in the Andhra Pradesh where he composed the famous hymn Sivanandalahari and installed a Srichakra in front of the shrine of the presiding goddess Sri Bhramarambika. It was at this time that Sri Sankara vanquished the Kapalikas and put down the homicidal practice to which they were addicted to in their religious worship.

It was at this time that Sri Sankara's supreme spirit of self-sacrifice and his boundless compassion towards even an enemy with murderous intent was evidenced. (The sage of Kanchi used to narrate the incident with his deep feeling of Guru Bhakthi). The chief of the Kapalikas wanted to do away with Sri Sankara. But he knew that such a divine person could not be done away with unless he himself gave his consent for that. The Kapalika, in addition, also knew the loving heart of Sri Sankara and his self-sacrificing nature. So he made bold to request Sri Sankara himself to give permission to behead him! He further said that he would offer the head to his god Kapali, the dreadful form of Siva, and by this offer of the head of a true monk he would reach the heaven of Kapali.

Without a moment's hesitation Sri Sankara gave his hearty approval for the atrocious request! He said, "Till now I had been thinking that the human body alone is incapable of being of service to fellow beings. The hide of the sheep serves as blanket, that of the cow for making musical instruments. The nerves of many animals find use as strings. So on and so forth. But the human body, once dead is just burnt or buried, without being of any use to anybody. I have been thinking so till now. But now, dear man, you say that my head would serve to confer Kalpali's heaven itself on you. I am glad to be utilised thus. If you are sure that I am a true monk do quickly chop off my head before my disciples turn up".

Unmoved by even such an exalted expression of love the Kapalika aimed his sword on Sri Sankara. But before it could touch the neck of Sri Sankara, the Kapalika himself fell dead due to the outburst of the wrath of the Almighty Vishnu in the Man-lion form of Narasimha.

Traversing thence to the Western Ghats, Sri Sankara worshipped Sri Mukambika. There he discovered the dumb prodigy who, on being cured of his defect, became his disciple and attained the name Hastamalaka. Another of the disciples was one Giri by name, generally considered to be backward by his fellow-disciples. Receiving a special mark of grace from Sri Sankara, he broke forth into a soul-stirring hymn of eight verses in praise of his guru, celebrated as the Totakashtaka, himself getting the sannyasa name of Totakacharya.

Resuming his travel, Sri Sankara went to Karnataka and reached Sringagiri (Sringeri). Here he erected a shrine to Sri Sarada, established another pontificate known as the Sarada Pitha and installed there the Bhogalinga from among those that he had brought from Kailas.

V

Meanwhile, Sri Sankara's mother was on the point of death. True to his promise to her, Sankara hastened to her bedside and invoked the grace of Vishnu to take her to Vaikuntha. As a sannyasin should not engage in any kind of ritual, his kinsmen refused to permit him to perform the lady's obsequies himself. Upon his insisting that the duty to one's mother overrode all rules and that he would himself perform his mother's cremation, they all to a man, withheld their co-operation. Sri Sankara carried the dead body to the backyard of his house unaided by anybody and lighted the funeral pyre by invoking his spiritual prowess. Sri Sankara went thence to Tirupati where he established the Dhanakarshana Yantra which, to this day, draws vast sums of wealth from pious devotees. Reaching Jambukeswaram in modern Tiruchirapalli, he tempered the ferocity of Akhilandeswari, the presiding Goddess by installing a shrine to Sri Vighneswara in front of Her, and fixing on the ears of Her person two rings known as Tatankas in the mystically designed Srichakra pattern. He then went to the land's end in Rameswaram to worship Lord Ramanatha in the Linga that he celebrated in his Dvadasalingstotra. in praise of the Lingas installed in the twelve (dvadasa) foremost temples of Siva. Returning, he visited Chidambaram and left the Mokshalinga, another of those he got in Kailas, to be worshipped there.

Travelling through the length and breadth of the country over, Sri Sankara ultimately reached Kancheepuram near Madras. Kanchi is known as one of the seven Mokshapuris of our sacred land (places which confer Liberation) and has had, through the ages, a memorable political, literary, cultural and religious history. Scholars and saints of all denominations and sects have either visited it in their time or taken permanent residence there. It has been the venue of philosophical disputations of all schools of thought. No religious leader considered his mission fulfilled or his victory complete unless he vanquished rivals of other faiths in that famous city. As its name signifies, Kanchi is the waistline of the earth and its central spot. It was but appropriate that Sri Sankara also should go to this place to proclaim the Advaita Vedanta vindicating it against other schools of religion and philosophy. Acclaimed by everyone as the supreme master of all that is to know, Sri Sankara ascended before a large assembly the throne of omniscience known as the Sarvajna Pitha at Kanchi.

He then mitigated the ugrakala, the fierce aspect of the Goddess Kamakshi drawing it into a Srichakra which he placed in front of Her and consecrated it. After renovating the temple to Lord Vishnu in the person of Sri Varadaraja, he asked the reigning king of Kanchi to fashion the city in the form of a Srichakra giving the central place to the shrine of Sri Kamakshi.

A few things are noteworthy in this connection. Kanchi is famous for its numerous temples in honour of Vishnu and Siva. But the main tower of all of them, howsoever distant they may be from the temple of Sri Kamakshi, face it without exception. The processional idols of all these shrines are taken round this Kamakshi temple when their annual festivals are celebrated. In none of the Siva temples of Kanchi is there a shrine for Siva's Consort, that of Kamakshi doing service for all of them. The city is famous as the place where Brahma himself performed a yajna attended by all the celestials.

 

VI

No wonder that Sri Sankara chose Kanchi to establish the pontificate known as the Kamakoti Pitha there. Of the five Lingas which he got from Kailas, he reserved the Yogalinga for worship by himself here in the Kamakoti Pitha. Entrusting the four chief maths that he had established in the important religious centers of the country in-charge of each of his four eminent disciples, Sankara chose the fifth that he established in Kanchi known as the Saradamatha, for his own stay and ministration. These five maths function to this day as bastions of our ancient Sanatana Dharma in general and of Advaita Vedanta in particular. They have had since Sri Sankara's time a long and illustrious line of pontifical successors who bear his hallowed name and continue to discharge the great mission that he entrusted to them. The Math associated with the Kanchi Kamakoti Pitham has a special significance by reason of its being the place where Sri Sankara spent his last days and finally shed his mortal body merging into the beautitude of Brahmanubhava.

 

VII

The text of the Srimukhas (pontifical epistles) granted by the Jagadgurus of the Kanchi Kamakoti Pitha since time immemorial refers to Sri Sankara as Nikila-Pashanda-Kantakotgha patanena visadi- krta-Veda-Vedanta-Marga-Shanmatha-Pratishthapa-kacharyah: i.e. describes him as 'one who swept off the thorns that encumbered the various forms of worship of the six manifestations of God'. Worship of these deities had waned in our land due to the inroads of Buddhism and Jainism. It was Sri Sankara who rescued them from oblivion and rid some of them of their unholy encrustations. Particular mention may be made of the vamachara practices in the Sakta religion and the abhorrent rituals of the Kapalikas. Hence Sri Sankara is gratefully spoken of as Shanmathapratishtapakacharya, which means, not one who established the six forms of worship for the first time but one who revived and gave strength and stability to the existing ones. Nor were they to Sri Sankara six different, and much less, opposed forms. They are six alternative ways in which the same Supreme God is worshipped according to the preference of the worshipper. Each chooses his Ishta devata among them, determined by his family tradition (kulachara) and his inclination (ruchi), and accommodates the rest also in a subsidiary way in his pattern of worship. Thus Sri Sankara was a great integrator within the fold of the Vedic religion and he brought about intra religious amity among all those who professed the Hindu faith.

 Such was the life and work of the illustrious Sankaracharya who packed within a brief period of thirty-two years a series of achievements which are unequalled both in their content and their variety. Judged by any test, as a writer, as a poet, as a thinker and debater, as a prophet and mystic, as a religious organiser, and by any aspect of his diversified personality Sri Sankara is unique among the great men of the world. He holds a pre-eminent position among the Master Minds that have shaped the thoughts and actions alike of their contemporaries and of posterity. Above all, the Advaita Vedanta that he expounded to such artistic perfection is the one and only philosophy that will effectively make for personal liberation from the shackles of life on the one hand, and for universal amity and peace liquidating social and national rivalries on the other. The Vedanta associated with his name belongs not to one section of the Hindus only. It is the philosophy of the entire humanity and deserves to be carefully studied and scrupulously practiced by men in every part of the globe. Most truly, Sri Sankara is referred to with love and devotion as Lokasankara, the most brilliant among the benefactors of mankind for all time and in all times."

Please also go through the following that only few know and is not being propagated by protagonist and also not publicized by the Advaita followers.

To err is human that too while young. The problem is these early philosophers were raised to the level of semi-deities and so can't be criticized today, being installed in temples as deities. Even Rama as human committed sins by killing Vali hiding and doubting her chastity living at Ravana's place in Asokavana and abandoning Sita over a false rumor of washer-man.

Advaita followers and others. Sankara traveled from Kanyakumari to Himalayas establishing four centers and raising several followers to make it strong but his sins were kept secret by his disciples to make Advaita strong ad formidable!

Once, Adi Sankara went to Banaras and prayed to Lord Viswanath there and asked specifically for three of his sins to be excused. The disciples who followed Sankaracharya were surprised and were wondering what those three sins for which he was seeking pardon were. 

Sankaracharya then explained the first sin in the following words. He addressed the Lord and said that knowing fully well that the Lord is omnipresent and all powerful, he had undertaken the journey all the way to Banaras to have the Lord's Darsan as if the Lord was present only in Banaras. This, according to Sankaracharya, was the first sin. The significance of this is that his practice was contrary to what he already knew.

His second sin was that as one whose infinite nature cannot be described in mere words, he had attempted to describe him in a string of words and thus had ignored what he had already known about the Lord.

His third sin was that having recognized that the human body is the temple of the Lord and having recognized that the body is made of five destructible elements, he had not put this knowledge into practice. The Jiva that lives in the body is indestructible and if studied carefully, we come to the conclusion that one who resides in the body has no birth and has no death and has neither attachment nor detachment.

He realized that the almighty is residing in him as the Atman and yet he undertook the long journey to get the Darsan of the almighty in a place external to his body. This was his third sin. Knowing that the Lord is in him, he has committed the sin of undertaking the journey to see the Lord. 

 



Saturday, January 15, 2022

Death and meaning of life in Upanishads

 

Death and Meaning of Life in Upanishads

(Compilation for a discourse by N.R. Srinivasan, Nashville, USA, January 15, 2020)

Death is not the end of the world. Death is a way of taking birth in a new form and starting life again. Because death happens to the body and not the soul, so soul always moves on. Until you attain Nirvana or exhausted all papa and punya and become free from the cycle of life and death, till then you have to keep taking birth.

FOWAI FORUM (INDIA) AND STEP (USA) invited us  to join the WEBINAR-215--Death and meaning of life in Upanishads to be presented by Dr. Pankaj Basotia, on Sunday, January 16, 2022. In this context it is advisable to go through the relevant slokas in MNU and a detailed rendering of this topic by Durga Prasada Rao, researching from various Indian scriptures, given below:

Gist of  Presentation by FOWAI: Death and meaning of Life in Upanishads--Upanishads are famous for the spiritual knowledge and wisdom they offer to mankind in general, but this knowledge and wisdom is often considered as other worldly, abstruse and highly mystical. Therefore, out of reach for most of the common people. This presentation, in contrast to the above belief, tries to demonstrate how the Upanishadic quest is related to the fears, anxieties and other universal concern of human be.

Let us go through first  what Mahanarayana Upanishad talks about  death and its cycle:

Ye te sahasramayu pāśā mtyo martyāya hantave | tān yajñasya māyayā sarvānavayajāmahe  

O Death, those thousand and ten thousand snares which thou hast laid for slaying man, all of them we remove by the power of our deeds of worship!

The word death is used in different connected senses. It’s most concrete shape is the termination of physical existence marked by stoppage of breath, consciousness and bodily functions. The force that brings about this is personified as Death.

The duration of life on this earth is determined by the merits and dements accruing from a man’s deeds. This is the view of the scriptures.

The god of Death adjudges each person according to his deserts and limits the duration of his life on the earth. Evil thoughts and deeds, errors of passion and temperament, sickness and suffering—all these are snares laid by Death to entrap unwary man.

Further, ignorance, carelessness, remissness, insatiable craving and harmful propensities are also listed among the army of Death.

Śiva, the auspicious God, is described as the greatest yogin, for, he has overcome the army of Death. Therefore He, the Auspicious Lord, is called Antakāntaka.

For the devotees of God, the way to escape from the meshes of Death, said above, lies in the power of worshipping Him—the performance of prescribed duties to God properly and in the right spirit. This is perhaps what is implied by the phrase yajñasya māyayā or by the power of worship.

Vedāntavijñānaviniścitārthā sanyāsayogādyataya śuddhasattvā te brahmaloke tu parāntakāle parāmtā parimucyanti sarve ..

Having attained the Immortality con­sisting of identity with the Supreme, all those aspirants who strive for self-control, who have rigorously arrived at the conclusion taught by the Vedanta through direct knowledge, and who have attained purity of mind through the practice of the discipline of yoga and steadfastness in the know­ledge of Brahman preceded by renunciation, get themselves released into the region of Brahman at the dissolution of their final body.

According to Śrī Śakarācārya, the goal of Vedānta is Paramātma-vijñāna or Self-Realization. The central theme of this verse is that this knowledge is attained through inner purity gained by taking to sannyāsa and yoga.

Sannyāsa implies renouncing worldly and religious work and preferring to remain forever steadfastly in the consciousness of Brahman. This is also yoga.

Those who perpetually strive to keep this spiritual state are called Yatis.

The last moment of life is called antakāla, end-time. Souls fated to rebirth confront antakāla repeatedly, but the soul that is illumined by the wisdom of Vedānta takes his last birth, and consequently he meets with his para-antakāla, final end-time.

The same author explains brahmalokeu in the plural from the view-point of many liberated souls who all merge into one Brahman.

The word parāmtā denotes the attainment of Immortality while one is living on the earth, and the verb parimucyanti implies the merging of the individual Self then and there, at the time of death, into the Supreme Self, without leaving a trace of separate individuality—-just as the birds flying across the sky do not leave any footprint there or the fish moving in water leave no trail of a path.

With attainment of illumination the aspirant becomes parāmtā and at the fall of the body he becomes paramukta, no more to be born again.

How yoga (योग), adhyātma (अध्यात्म) and brahmavidyā (ब्रह्मविद्या) all three are concerned with the same issue of “how can man overcome the anxiety and fear of death? How can one attain immortality?”

THE UPANISHADS ON DEATH AND BEYOND

Dr.  Durga Prasada Rao,Center for Consciousness Studies, Dayalbagh Educational Institute, India.

The concept of death is a mysterious aspect, daunting humanity from time immemorial.  Even the mere mention of this word 'death' makes one to tremble. It causes great anxiety, creates unbearable fear in the minds of every one.   Though man is aware of the unavoidable nature of death, is still afraid of facing it for he thinks that it is the end of everything. But all this is due to the wrong understanding of the concept.  The fear, caused by wrong understanding of a particular concept is removed when it is properly understood. Death, according to general understanding,   is the permanent cessation of all biological functions that sustain a living organism. And if we define death in terms of consciousness, the living organism can be said to have died when consciousness ceases to exist.  In the absence of consciousness, the body is simply a lump of inert matter. So it is very essential   to understand the nature of death to overcome the fear.

The role played by the Upanishads in analyzing the nature of death is unique and appealing, only some of the important aspects are however   focused which give solace to the departed soul as well as the relatives of the departed soul. .  The Upanishads, also known as Vedanta are the concluding portions of the Vedas. They are the essence, the cream, the culmination of the Vedic Philosophy. Being esoteric in nature they deal with the principles of creation nature of the ultimate reality relation between individual soul and Supreme Soul, Dissolution of the world, goal of life and so on. The word Upanishad is derived from the root 'shad' and the two prefixes upa and ni  which together mean the guru's proximity. It is a curious fact that Upanishad is also derived from the root 'shad' meaning gati, the movement, as it leads the listener to the highest goal which is realization of Self.  There is still another meaning  for the same root 'shad'  – destruction of the innate ignorance of man that causes fear of birth , old age and death and leading  him to enlightenment and the Upanishadic salvation.  Upanishads being the quintessence of Vedic knowledge and wisdom, combined philosophy with experience and have been influencing human mind for the last several centuries by paving the way for transcendence from humanity to divinity.- According to  them, death is not  the complete cessation of one's existence. 

Our Sastras, by   suggesting a philosophical way out,    warn us not to be afraid of death. Oh fool! Why are you afraid of death? Do you think that Yama, the God of death will spare you even if you are afraid?  But it is certain that he will not catch hold of an unborn. Therefore, try not to be born again in this world.

मृत्योबिभॆषि किं मूढभीतं मुंचति वै यम: | अजातं नैव गृह्णाति  कुरु यत्नमजन्मनि ||

Mrutyorbibheshi kim mudha nbhitam munchati vai Yamah

Ajatam naiva grhnati kuru yatnamajanmani

Here the word Ajanmani i.e., birthlessness constitutes three aspects:

1.   The realization of the inevitable nature of death

2.   Proper understanding of the nature of death

3.   Belief in the permanent existence of soul. 

The word' Mrityu ' which means death is used several times in the Upanishads. Isavasya Upanishads declares that those who devote themselves both to the Knowledge of mundane (worldly) and supra- mundane (knowledge of the ultimate reality);   by the knowledge of world they overcome death and by knowledge of ultimate Reality they attain immortality.

विद्यां चाविद्यां यस्तद्वेदोभयं तथा

For the proper understanding of the nature of death, both worldly and other worldly knowledge is essential. Hence, it is said in the Mundakopanishad that there are two kinds of Vidya para and apara. Para is Supra-mundane while  apara is  mundane and  both are equally worthy of acquit ion as the supreme function of them bring relief from the worldly entanglements and   leads to the realization of Atman while Aparavidya   enables  one to acquire knowledge of the physical world.

द्वे विद्ये वेदितव्ये इति ह स्म यद्वद्ब्रह्मविदो वदन्ति परा चैवापरा च  तत्रापरा ऋग्वेदो यजुर्वेदसामवेदोSधर्ववेदशिक्षा कल्पो व्याकरणं निरुक्तं छन्दो ज्योतिषमिति अथ परा यया तदक्षरमधिगम्यते| ()

By this it is evident that the knowledge of both is necessary to overcome the fear of death and to attain immortality. The discussion about death, at length, is found in the Katha Upanishad. Nachiketa, cursed by his father Vajasaneya reached the abode of Yama. He was bestowed with three boons by Yama, and Nachiketa asked Yama to explain the nature of death as the third boon.

He asks: When a man dies, there is this doubt; some say that this Atman continues after death; some say that it ceases to be. I would like to know the truth taught by you.. This is the third of my boons. Then, Yama to divert his attention, told him that it was very difficult to understand even to gods. Since the truth regarding death is subtle, Yama asked Nachiketa to choose some other boon instead. But Nachiketa insisted to explain that knowledge as it was very difficult to understand, and there was no better teacher than him to expound of it   and nothing else was   equal to that knowledge.  Yama again tried his best to divert the attention of the boy by granting a number of worldly pleasures such as long life, wealth and worldly comforts, but all his attempts were in vain. Ultimately, Nachiketa's inquisitiveness and firm determination that ' No other boon this Nachiketa will ask made Yama   pleased   at heart and he  explained the secret of death. The knowledge of the secret of death constitutes three aspects.

I.           WHAT IS BORN MUST DIE:

The general dictum Jatasya maranam dhruvam explains that death is inevitable to a person who is born. An allegorical expression about death depicts the same thing very interestingly.

There is a cage like body of which all the nine doors   are open.  There is dwelling an air like bird.  It is surprising how it is still surviving and nothing to surprise if it goes off.

उद्घाटितनवद्वारे पंजरे विहगो sनिल: यत्तिष्ठति तदाश्चर्यं प्रयाणे विस्मयकुत:     (Udbhatacharya's poem)

Nachiketa has already an idea about the transitory nature of life.  He, without any fear, responded to the curse of his father by requesting not to repent over it and also added that like corn, a man ripens and falls to the ground; like corn, he springs up again in his season.

अनुपश्य यथा पूर्वे प्रतिपश्य तथा परे सस्यमिव मर्त्यपच्यते सस्यमिवाजायते पुन:( कठ उपनिषद्१/)

The unavoidability of death is stressed in the Bhagavadgita also which is also considered to be the quintessence of the Upanishads. Lord krishna speaks to Arjuna.

He says:  one that is born death is certain and certain is birth for the one that has died. Therefore for what is unavoidable, thou should not grieve.

जातस्य हि धृवो मृत्युधृवं जन्म मृतस्य च तस्मादपरिहार्यॆsर्थे न त्वं शोचितुमर्हसि (II-27)

On some other occasion also Krishna consoles Arjuna by explaining the nature of death. Arjuna!  Everything in this world is created for a purpose. The movement the pus pose is served it is not needed any more. . It is even so with men. Each man is set on this strange eventful journey called life. He has been sent into this world with a purpose. Once that purpose is served, the earth has no more need of him. It is the case with all of us, even me. I have created myself on this earth for a purpose. It is not yet over. Something still remains. The moment it is finished, I will die too, and so will you and your dear brothers.  Do not grieve.

In Dhammapada it is said “Not in the sky nor in the depths of ocean nor having entered caverns of the mountains, nay such a place is not to be found in the world where a man may dwell without being overpowered by death. Many parables are also there in our literature to explain this truth.

Mahabharata went to the extent of ridiculing the peculiar mind set of the people who thinks that life is permanent even though the witness the death of every living in every movement. Yudhisthira, being asked by Yaksha  whether there is any amazing thing in the world replies  that every moment ,  some body somewhere is breathing his last ; yet the wonder of wonders is that who are alive  for the moment feel as though they are assured of their lives.

अहन्यहनि भूतानि गच्छन्ति यममन्दिर | मन्ये शाश्वतमिच्छन्ति किमाश्चर्यमत:परम्

So it is necessary to realize the certainty of death. 

II DEATH IS LIFE AND LIFE IS DEATH:

As rightly pointed out by the French Philosopher Pierre Chandain “ we are not physical beings having spiritual experiences but spiritual beings having physical experiences”.  But man, being attached to mundane objects, ignores one's own   divine nature and confines himself to the physical domain. It is our bounden duty to realize our true nature to uplift the humanity. The idea of life in this world actually being a death is no means new.

The Greek Philosopher and mystic, Heraclitus (c.535-475 BCE) , clearly fond of the word play

Suggested by the idea, wrote: Our life is death and our death life.

(Heraclitus, in golden verses of Pythagoras, 52-53, HVPp 105)

He went to the extent of saying that life in this world, though it is called life, is in fact spiritual death. The metaphorical expression of him sounds this ide

The name of the bow (bios) is life (bios), but its work is death.

(Heraclitus, Fragment, 115, HPWp.91) A treasury of Mystic Terms, 6.2 p 160-161.

Upanishads state that death is the real state of one's own existence and it is the natural state while life is artificial. According to Sri Nisargadatta Maharaj a yogi, Death  is a change in the living process of a particular body. Integration ends and disintegration sets in. In the Mahabharata, when Arjuna was grieving over the sad demise of his son Abhimanyu, Krishna sought to disabuse his mind in the following way: Oh Arjuna! This boy, whom you are claiming as your son, came down in to life from an unseen metaphysical realm. He has now gone back to that realm. He does not belong to you, even as you don't belong to him. What is the good of your wailing over a matter, over which you have no control?

अदृश्यात्स समुद्भूतपुनश्चादृश्यतां गत:? | नाsसौ तव न तस्य त्वं कुतो हि परिदॆवना?

Kalidasa also expressed the same view when Aja, the son of Raghu was wailing over the death of his wife Indumati. It is said that we are in an unnatural state while in life and death reinstates us to our natural state. So man is expected to be satisfied with whatever span of life he lives and he should not grieve over death, because it is his natural state.

मरणं प्रकृतिशरीरिणां विकृतिर्जीवितमुच्यते बुधै: | क्षणमप्यतिष्ठते श्वसन्यदि जन्तुर्ननु लाभवानसौ| (रघुवंश:/ Canto VIII/87.).

Johann Gottlieb Fitchte ( 1762-1814), the German philosopher, who lived several centuries after  Kalidasa  of the same view who opined that “ what we call life is perhaps death, and what we call death takes us back to the realm from which we are shot down to this life.

 

DEATH IS FOR THE BODY NOT FOR SOUL

In the Katha Upanishad, Yama explains Nachiketa, in a nutshell that the man who has the knowledge of Atman neither takes birth nor dies. Because Atman has neither cause nor effect. It is unborn, permanent and eternally remains the same                                                                         

न जायते म्रियते वा विपश्चि न्नायं कुतश्चिन्न बभूव कश्चित् |

अजो नित्यशाश्वतोSयं पुराणो न हन्यते हन्यमाने शरीरे|| (/१६)

 

SEEING PLURALITY IS ALSO DEATH: 

According to the Upanishads, Consciousness which is one without a second,  is the primary and fundamental   aspect of   Reality. It is both empirical and transcendental. The entire universe is cradled in consciousness which arises where there is perfect order and harmony.  It plays different roles in different states of human life and beyond. The  states such as waking, dreaming,   deep sleep are obvious  and mundane and the fourth state,  also known as  Turiya  is  extra-ordinary  hence it is  supra- mundane. The conscious Self in waking state  is  called Vishva, a gross enjoyer  of  external objects; in  dream state,  it  is  Taijasa,  subtle enjoyer of  internal objects. The same consciousness in deep sleep, is prajna, is a mass of cognition unified, consisting of bliss and enjoyment of bliss. The same consciousness, devoid of these qualities, is said to be the fourth transcendental) state, Turiya. Unlike the other  three,  it is   supra -  normal,  unseen, beyond empirical determination, beyond the grasp of mind, unthinkable, indescribable, consciousness alone where all phenomena cease, unchanging, peaceful, nondual, action less, incomprehensible,  inferable  and  in essence, it is the state of Pure Consciousness.

Brihadaranyaka Upanishad says that Consciousness also known as Atman is here; the same is there; that which is there ; the same is here (this world)  he suffers death after death who perceives Atman as many. Everything is only the manifestation of Atman.  There is nothing different from it. One who finds diversity is repeatedly subject to birth and death.

By the mind i.e. initiation alone it is to be perceived.

There is in fact no diversity. He gets death after death, who perceives here seeming diversity? Br.Up. 4/4/222)

Katha Upanishad also expresses the same view by using verbatim twice. मृत्योमृत्युमाप्नोति य इह नानेव पश्यति| (2/4/10-11)

On the close perusal of the Upanishads, we can realize that the underlying principle of them   is consciousness which is immortal and the realization of  which  keeps one beyond death and makes him the enjoy er of Supreme Bliss.   Chandogya Upanishad also states that the nature of Atman (soul) is Sat, Chit and Ananda; Ever-existent, Consciousness and Bliss. All beings here are indeed, born from Bliss, having been born, they remain in Bliss, and on departing, they enter into Bliss.

यतो वा इमानि भूतानि जायन्ते येन जातानि जीवन्ति | त्प्रयन्त्यभिसंविशन्ति तद्विजिज्ञासस्व तद्ब्रह्मेति (तै..-)

(yato va imani bhutani jayante yena jatani jivanti yatprayantyabhisamvisanti  tadvijijnasasva tadbrahmeti)

Taittiriya Upanishad emphatically declares that the enlightened man who realizes his own nature as Bliss is never afraid of any thing

आनन्दं ब्रह्मणो विद्वान्न बिभेति कुतश्चन  Anandam brahmano vidvan na bibheti kutaschana) ( Taittiriya -2-9-1).

THREE BODIES AND FIVE SHEATHS

For the realization of one's own nature, the knowledge of the metaphysical nature of human body is quite essential.

As analyzed in the Upanishads, the human frame consist of three bodies and five sheaths. The bodies are 1. Gross 2. Subtle 3. Causal and sheaths are Annamaya, Pranamaya, Manomaya, Vijnana-maya and Anandamaya.

For example the shell of a tamarind corresponds to the Gross body. The pulp represents the subtle body. The seed corresponds to causal body. To explain the same in a scientific way, ice represents the gross body, water represents the subtle body and H O represents the causal body. (Practice of Vedanta by Sivananda Saraswati- p.47)

GROSS BODY

The gross body, also known as physical body, is made up of five elements. They are Earth, Water, Fire, Air and Space. It constitutes the Annamayakosa, the food sheath. It disintegrates into its component parts only after death. This body is the resultant product of our karmas. We experience the existence of this body in waking state. When the karmas are consumed up on the dawn of the knowledge of the Supreme Self, we no longer take up any new body.

SUBTLE BODY:

This is composed of seventeen elements and represents three sheaths viz., the sheath of

Vital force--Pranamaya kosa; mind --Manomaya kosa, and intellect Vijnana-- maya kosa. The elements constitute five sensory organs such as skin, eye, ear, tongue and nose and five motor organs such as mouth, hand, leg,  anus and genital organ and five vital forces viz., Prana, Apana, Vyana, Udana and Samana and mind and intellect.  This body is very subtle and more expansive and extensive than physical body. This subtle body, inside the physical body is compared to be a bladder in a football.   (Practice of Vedanta, by Sivananda saraswati- p 48.)

It is the seat of desires and emotions. It is this body that goes to the heaven and hell and comes back after experiencing the fruits of its actions. Death means the separation of this subtle body from the physical body. It is the subtle body that operates in dream state. This body has the capacity to expand and contract. It contracts in small creatures, and expands in big animals. This subtle body will get dissolved only after Videhamukthi. Physical body cannot do anything without the help of this subtle body.

CAUSAL BODY

The causal body is the cause for the two other bodies. It is formed of the ultra-fine mental energies of causal matter and contains the impressions in a seed form. This body accommodates Anandamayakosa and   functions in deep sleep. Atman is distinct from these three bodies. So it is neither physical body nor subtle body nor even causal body. It is beyond these three. It is Pure Being, Pure Consciousness and Pure Bliss.  But it is misunderstood as the individual self or false self, due to the identification of the body and senses which have no independent existence.

Atman, being different from all these and beyond, has nothing to do with them. It never dies when the body dies.

Since the happiness we get in this world is inferior to that of eternal happiness, Death is said to be a door way to eternal happiness (bliss). Aeschylus, a Greek poet and dramatist (525-456B.C) also expressed the same opinion by saying that ' call no man happy till he is dead'.

When man dies it means that soul leaves the body but not otherwise, because, it is not soul that needs the body, it is the body that needs soul. Here Swami Vivekananda distinguishes the Indian view from that of Western by saying  that Hindus believe that a man is a soul and has a body, while Western people believe  he is a body and possesses a soul.( the complete works of swami Vivekananda, Vol:VIII, page236.) So, death is the real state of our eternal existence.

This identification is really a mistaken knowledge and this mistaken knowledge is not the outcome of an indescribable matter. This misidentification of the Atman with the body-mind complex is in the experience of every one. This false identification has no beginning or end, but this can be eliminated by the right knowledge of the real self/Atman.  Mistaking one thing for the other is the result of not knowing the real nature of that particular thing. Knowing the Atman as the body-mind complex and the body-mind complex as the Atman is a mistaken/false knowledge. We have conceived difference between ourselves and the Supreme Reality owing to this mistaken knowledge only. If this mistaken knowledge is subjugated as such by the right kind of inquiry it is stultified by the true knowledge which results in self-realization. Then the Atman, which is the core of one's being   reveals Himself as Pure Being, Pure Consciousness and Pure Bliss. The stultification of the mistaken knowledge and the birth of the new knowledge of one's  True Being,  the all-pervading Atman,  are two events that happen simultaneously on approaching and receiving the  instructions  from a Guru who is both a Jnani (man of wisdom) and a Tattvadarshi (Seer of the truth).  (B. G. IV. 34)

 

THE PROCESS OF DEATH:

Even though there is no difference of opinion about the death as disintegration of body and soul the process differs from individual to individual. Brihadaranyaka Upanishad explains the process of death in the following way. When the self becomes weak and senseless, as it were the organs come to it .. it comes to the heart ( Br. Up.- 4/4/1); again the top of the heart brightens. Through that brightened top the self  departs, either through the eye or through the head or through any other part of the body (Ibid 4-4-2). By this, it is evident that at the time of departure the soul together with the organs comes to the heart. At that moment the departing soul, on account of its past karmas, has a peculiar consciousness picturing to it its next life, and goes to the body which is revealed by that consciousness.      It further explains the plan of consciousness to its next life, the way of departure from the body, the nerves which consciousness passes through.  Various conditions of the soul at death, the condition of soul of unreleased and soul of released after death.

DEATH IS NOT THE END OF EVERY THING:

Then the self is endowed with particular consciousness and afterwards passes on to the body that brought to light by that consciousness. This consciousness is determined by one's past karmas. So, everyone is expected to be careful of his actions. One should do good deeds avoid the bad ones. It is not a sin, if he cannot do any good to others but doing badly to others is severely condemned. Gita, the quintessence of all the Upanishads, assured us that good karma will never go waste and unnoticed. It will lead for the betterment of the individual in the next birth. The saying goes like this:

नहि कळ्याणकृत्कश्चिद्दुर्गतिं तात गच्छति (/४०); शुचीनां श्रीमतां गेहे योगभ्रष्टो Sभिजायते| (/४१)

The span in between death to another birth is also discussed in the Brihadaranyaka. It states that just as a leech dwelling in grass, catches another support and withdraws itself, so does this Self set aside the present body -make it sense less, take up a new body and withdraw itself.

तद्यथा तृणजलायुका तृणस्यान्तं गत्वा न्यमाक्रममाक्रम्यात्मानमुपसंहरति,एवमेवायमात्मेदं शरीरं निहत्यअविद्यां गमयित्वा अन्यमाक्रममाक्रम्यात्मानमुपसंहरति|  (//)

BY LOOSING BODY ONE LOOSES NOTHING

Man loses nothing in death.  As soul passes in this body through childhood, youth and age, even so is its taking on of another body. The sage is not perplexed by this.

देहिनोsस्मिन्यथा देहे कौमारं यौवनं जरा | तथा देहान्तरप्राप्ति:धीरस्तत्र न मुह्यति./१३

The statement of Jalaluddin Rumi, a famous Sufi saint is also worth mentioning here in this context.

I died as mineral and became a plant.

I died as plant and rose to animal

I died as animal and I was man

Why should I fear when I was not less by dying?

Yet once more I shall die as man

To soar with angels blest

But even from angelhood I must pass on Masnavi

It is quite evident that the study of the Upanishads dispels the fear of death. The Schönhage’s statement that 'the study of the Upanishads has been the solace of my life, it will be the solace of my death' is the real truth.

 

SELECTED BIBLIOGRAPHY

1.    A history of Philosophy, Frank Thill, central book depot, Allahabad.

2.    A Treasure of Mystic Terms, John Davidson, Science of soul research center, Radhasoami Satsang Beas, New Delhi, India

3.     Bhagavadgita with commentary by S. Radha Krishna

4.    Brahma-Sutras, with text, word for word Translation Swami VIRESWARANANDA, Advaita Ashrama November 2008.

5.     I am That, Sri Nisarga Datta Maharaj, Chethana pvt Ltd.

6.     Mahabharatam of Sri Vedavyasa.

7.    Some gems from the ocean of Sanskrit, by Dr. D. Arkasomayaji. TTD Religious Publication series.No.344.1989.

8.   Sri Sankara's Advaita Siddhanta, by S. Vitthala Sastri, Sri Sacchidananda Printers, Jambur House, D. No.211, Kshetraiah Road, Mysore-1

9.    The Principal Upanishads, S. Radha Krishnan.