SARVABHAUMA EMPEROR SRIRAMACHANDRA AND THE
INVINCIBLE CITY AYODHYA
How the Ayodhya Verdict is a Covenant to Live in peace
(Compilation
by N. R. Srinivasan from Various E-mails to HR Forum,
December
2019)
The Tapas of Valmiki turned a history to a poetic composition of essence of Vedas and itihasa. The Tapas of half a millennium has culminated in a civilizational landmark
by Ayodhya Verdict. In reality The
Ramayana as Adikavya is not a history
but a historical Ballard spiritually rendered with poetic license. When one regards a historical episode from the
perspective of realism, it becomes history: merely, history. However, when we regard it from the perspective of an event that has the capacity
to transform our hearts, it becomes poetry—a poem that is far more effective
and impactful than mere imaginative poetry. The Ramayana is a poem that
has internalized history when you turn to your Inner-Net in an unparalleled,
transformative fashion. This is why it
has acquired global acceptance and reverence and also a
real historical fact including all details. The Ramayana definitely
contains historical material. But beyond this superficiality, it is also
material that innately refines our heart. It is the history of a country; but more profoundly, it is the history of
the Atman of our people (from the thoughts of Rashtrakavi D.V. Gundappa
of Karnataka). I have purely focused on
the mere historical material throufgh the vision of normal historian who is influenced
by shadripus, in my review of
Ramayana. Valmiki himself exposes
Ramayana to these human emotions and hasty decision that I have brought to limelight!
Rama
was appointed as King by Dasaratha when he had just crossed 26 years and
it was 27th year of him when he was asked to leave Ayodhya for 14 years. After
that he returned back at the age of 41. He then ruled for 11,000 years (some says
11,700 years on a different scale). His children Lava and Kusa ruled over globe
of the Western part of Ayodhya.
The
word "Ayodhya" means "not to be fought" or, more
idiomatically in English, "invincible". This meaning is
attested by the Atharvaveda which uses it to refer to the unconquerable
city of gods. The 9th century Jain poetic composition Adi Purana also states
that Ayodhya "does not exist by name alone but by the merit" of being
unconquerable by enemies. Satyopakhyana interprets the word slightly
differently, stating that it means "that which cannot be conquered by sins
meaning Capital City of Dharmarajya or Ramarajya of the
Globe. The cities of Ayutthaya (Thailand), and Yogyakarta (Indonesia),
are named after Ayodhya.
There have been numerous authors who have accepted the Ramayana as a history of ancient events. For example, the first Governor General of India, Sri Rajaji, wrote on the Ramayana and called it a history, as also did the English Indologist Sir William Jones. Various other western authors have made a study of the culture and history of the Ramayana, such as Philip Ludendorff in his book Rama’s Story in Shiva’s City, California University; Joe Burk halter’s Flockier and Laurie Sears.
Is it possible that Rama was a
historical figure and Ramayana based on a historical figure? Most historians
doubt that there is enough evidence to say that he existed. It is true that
there is not much direct evidence for Rama’s existence except for the Ramayana
itself, and other ancient texts that refer to him. This however doesn’t
necessarily mean that he did not exist, since we also only have textual
evidence of the existence of figures like Socrates, Jesus, and Confucius, and
their existence is not doubted by most historians. The lack of monuments and
coins referring to Rama do not necessary make him entirely mythical. It simply
makes it more challenging to explain the lack of monumental structures or coins
bearing his name if he were an important king. It is also possible that
archaeologists simply haven’t found any such inscriptions yet.
In the Biblical case, many scholars
doubted the historicity of King David until the Tel Dan inscription was
discovered which made a reference to the dynasty of King David showing that
David at least had existed as an Israelite King or Chieftain. Additionally,
many of the locations mentioned in the Ramayana have been found just
like Biblical sites such as Jericho and Classical sites such as the city of
Troy. The existence of locales visited by Rama in the Ramayana do not
necessarily prove that Rama was historical or based on a historical figure, but
it does lend credence to the idea since other ancient texts have been
historically validated in the same way. For now, the evidence is at best
inconclusive.
I call popular Sitarama as Seetalrama. Rama was
cold to Sita. Seetal means cold. Even though he was a
champion of rehabilitating abused, distressed and down trodden woman in
society with dignity and grace as a king devoted to Prajaa Dharma
he was indifferent to Patni-dharma and in the end abandoned
Sita, listening to a derogatory and baseless rumor, who completely shattered and broken down gave
up her ghost early in her prime of life while Rama is said to have ruled
over Ayodhya for more than 10000 years solely devoted to Prajaa Dharma. He
was solely wedded to his subjects.
Sri Rama was not only an Indian legend but a global
phenomenon. As of now, many scientists,
based on astronomical data, have propounded that Rama existed around 5144 BC.
In
the present days we may be said to live in a Kali Yuga, which is said to
have started in 3102 BC with the end of the Mahabarata (Dwapra). This date is also considered by many
Hindus to be the day that Lord Krishna
left Earth and went to abode.
The astrology software (Jhora 7.66 version) reveals Rama's birth time planets on 9th Jan 5114 BCE, a day before Dr. Bhatnagar's date in his astronomy software. This is to say that the planetary combinations given in Valmiki Ramayana for Rama's birth did occur in recent past, say 7000 years ago.
It was at Rama’s behest the Sethu was made by Vanaras, Rukshyas et al. It was made in a planned and deliberate way. That was proved by Dr. Badri Narayana team. He established that Sethu bund is man-made but the date could be anytime between 5800 to 7000 years BCE. They also arrived at the date of those layers which are within the range of 7000 years and later. Around 11000 years before the present the sea level was 120 meters lower than now and the naturally available raised land due to receding waters at Sethu was a land mass connecting India with Lanka. That means the land bridge at Sethu existed by itself before 11000 years ago. It helped Rama and his army to cross the sea with the help of boulders spread on the raised land still covered with sea waters at inconvenient height.
When Ikshvaku, the progenitor of Rama's race
established his kingdom, there was no Ganges - it was only after Bhagiratha,
another predecessor of Rama, that Ganges started flowing across North India. So
any dating of Rama can happen only after the geological existence of the Ganges.
This brings the date of Ganges later to 10,000 years ago when the Himalayan
glaciers started melting. The cross-checking comes from sea-level rises, which
peaked around 7300 years ago.
In
the epic Ramayana, Sage Valmiki mentioned that when Lord Ram was born, the sun
was located in Aries, Saturn was in Libra, Jupiter & the Moon were in
Cancer, Venus was seen in Pisces while Mars was located in Capricorn. Moreover
it was the ninth day of the increasing phase of the moon in the lunar month of
Chaitra. The two slides on the cover of the book of Pushkar Bhatnagar together
display, with the help of a powerful software, that these unique astral
conditions were present in the sky on 10 January 5114 B.C. This book employs
the scientific advancement of the West to prove the antiquity of the East. The
book also discovers the dates of a number of events of the life of Lord Ram by
using the Planetarium software:
Rama went to forest (Vanavas) – 5 January 5089 BCE
Khara –Rama fight (near Panchavati) – 7 October 5077 BCE
Rama killed Vali – 3 April 5076 BCE
Hanuman in Lanka – 12 September 5076 BCE
Hanuman returns from Lanka to Northern shore – 14 September 5076 BCE
Rama left, along with Vanara army, from Kishkindha
towards Lanka – 19 September 5076 BCE
Hanuman and party took ONLY 6 days to arrive in
Kishkindha (Hampi/Bellari, Karnataka) from Rameshwaram area! (Shri Bhatnagar
agrees with this in chapter 11 of his book)
Rama
killed Ravana – 4 December 5076 BCE
Rama returns from Lanka, to ashram of sage Bharadwaj
– 29 December 5076 BCE
Rama meets Bharata, after returning from Lanka – 30
December 5076 BCE
Typical of India known for its
controversies and conflicts studies made on these events referring to prevalent
Hindu Panchangas
and based on the present
traditional celebration of Rama Navami in the month of April decided by astrologers, these dates are contradicted. One such comment is:
“Pushkar Bhatnagar has done some work
to date the birth time of Lord Rama. According to him "By using a powerful
planetarium software, I found that the planetary positions mentioned in
Ramayana for the date of birth of Lord Ram had occurred in the sky at around
12.30 p.m. of 10th January 5114 BC."
To prove his theory Pushkar Bhatnagar has considered the duration of one Kali Yuga as 1200 solar years (see Yukteswara below)
According to Vedic wisdom all Yugas are cyclic and Pushkar has taken 3012 BC as the starting year of the Kali Yuga. It is well known that all planetary positions are cyclic and keep repeating in similar patterns including solar and lunar eclipses. There is no work to prove that the similar astronomical events as described in Ramayana didn't occur before 5114 BC.
One needs to look back up to 1 million
solar years in the past to ascertain birth time of Lord Rama. As per Pushkar
Bhatnagar, his software was capable to look back 99,999 BC in the past which is
only 10% of the needed time span. Any such studies should consider all
instances of similar astronomical events during last 1 million solar years.
Till we don't have any concrete
historical and astronomical proofs, it would be more appropriate and accurate
to say that Lord Rama was born much earlier than 869,114 solar years in the
past and according to Hindu calendar it was Navami of Chaitra Shukla Paksha”.
Why the avatars can’t be of cyclic
nature? The
controlling demigods (devas) possess a life span that is equal to one day of
Brahma (1,000 divya-yugas, or 4,320,000,000 earthly years). This category
includes most of the elemental controllers as well as most of the demigods
within the court of Indra. Various d gods such as Rama, Ganesha, Karttikeya,
etc., are actually posts that are occupied by a particular living entity for
one day of Brahma. At the end of the day of Brahma, when the dissolution waters
fill the universe, they leave their respective posts and allow other living
entities to fill them. For example, it is described in the Puranas that in the
present day of Brahma, the post of Karttikeya (Skanda) is being occupied by Sri
Sanat-kumara, the great liberated son of Lord Brahma.
another
study questioning software studies and basing it on modern so called Vedic
Astrology based Hindu Panchagas says Rama's Birth Date is 4th December 7323
BCE. A Hindu orthodox pundit says “Nope,
According to Vedic Scripture, Lord Shri Rama
was born (appeared) about 8 million year ago, on the 9th day of Chaitra (March
- April)” basing it on present day celebration of Rama Navami!
In this context let me recall your
memory how our astrologers claiming to be Vedic astrologers are absolutely
false. Please also recall my detailed discourse on Vedic astrology based on the
research work of David Frawley. Guided by our false astrologers and their
Panchangas (almanacs) we believe Uttarayana Punyakala, changing of the
direction of travel of Sun, starts on Makara Sankranti Day on January 14/15
every year. But astronomically Winter Solstice Day is celebrated all over the World
around December 22. Gregorian Calendar regularly takes into consideration both
century as well as leap year correction needed and so it is astronomically
correct. Hindu astrologers have not cared to do any such correction from the
beginning and hence celebrate both Uttarayana and Dakshinayana Punyakala (Hindu Winter and summer Solstice Days) on wrong
days and yet claim that they are Vedic astrologers. International Yoga day falls on Summer
Solstice day June 21 while we celebrate Dakshinayana Punyakala on July 16? Who
is to bell the cat, nobody knows? Earlier they vehemently protested and sent
the recommendations of National calendar Commission set up by Pundit Jawaharlal
Nehru to archives to save the false astrologers and traditions. In this context it will be wiser to go by the
scientific study of Pushkar Bhatnagar until things are set right in Hindu
Religious Panchangas. Misguided by the false Panchagas we observe all religious
days on wrong dates that include Rama Navami also.
In such a perplexing situation it becomes very difficult for common masses to arrive at any conclusive view regarding the existence of Rama. Hence, we have to first analyze various facts regarding Rama, and his epic, Ramayana, before arriving on any final verdict.
In such a perplexing situation it becomes very difficult for common masses to arrive at any conclusive view regarding the existence of Rama. Hence, we have to first analyze various facts regarding Rama, and his epic, Ramayana, before arriving on any final verdict.
In
Raghuvansham, Kalidasa provide details of Rama’s forefathers, and his various
Santatis (successors) who ruled after him whose source is unknown?
It is a well-known fact that Rama was born during the latter part of Tretaa Yuga. Hence, if we assume that Rama was born in the present cycle of Tretaa Yuga then it means that he was born at least 1,000,000 years ago. However, Vayu Purana provides us the correct chronological period of Ramayana. If we take Vayu Purana’s period into consideration then the period of Rama becomes at least 18,000,000 years old. Hence, we can jump to conclude that the period18, 000, 000 years old. That makes us to easily conclude that the period of Rama in the time scale is at least 1, 000,000 to 18,000, 000 years.
It is a well-known fact that Rama was born during the latter part of Tretaa Yuga. Hence, if we assume that Rama was born in the present cycle of Tretaa Yuga then it means that he was born at least 1,000,000 years ago. However, Vayu Purana provides us the correct chronological period of Ramayana. If we take Vayu Purana’s period into consideration then the period of Rama becomes at least 18,000,000 years old. Hence, we can jump to conclude that the period18, 000, 000 years old. That makes us to easily conclude that the period of Rama in the time scale is at least 1, 000,000 to 18,000, 000 years.
This
particular view is also supported by the fact that when Hanuman travelled to
Shri Lanka in the search of Sita, over there he saw elephants having four
tusks. Hence, this is now an issue for archaeologists/biologists to ascertain
when did such elephants exist on earth? Gomphotheres
were elephant-like proboscideans, but not belonging to the family
Elephantidae. They were widespread in North America during the Miocene and
Pliocene epochs 1.6 million years ago and even earlier. Gomphotheres
differed from elephants in
their tooth structure, particularly the chewing surfaces on the molar teeth.
The earlier species had four tusks,
and their retracted facial and nasal bones prompted paleontologists to believe
that gomphotheres had elephant-like
trunks. Another
interesting fact that has been mentioned in Valmiki’s Ramayana is that the
maternal home of Bharata and Shatrughna was in a country where transportations
took place in the form of vehicles being propelled by dogs or deer. When the
two brothers returned to Ayodhya from their maternal home, they crossed many
places covered by snow, and were also dressed up in clothes made of wool. Now,
the location in which this episode took place is yet to be ascertained.
One of the intriguing issues of
Ramayana is that it says that Rama ruled for 11,000 years. His father Dasaratha
also was said to have lived for 60,000 years while saying Rama went to forest
at the age of 25 for 14 years! Information like this makes the 'rational' one
dismiss the very history of Rama. There is nothing irrational or fictional
about it if we know some basics of Time computation in olden days. There are 10
types of calculation of time that I will explain later.
Look at Rama's life line. From Sita's
version in Sundharakanda, we
know
that Rama went on Banishment in his 25th year. 25+ 14 years in exile = 39. He
ascended the throne on his 39th year. If he is to have ruled for 11,000 years,
then according to Ahoreva samvatsara, it comes to 31 years. Add 31 years to 39
when he ascended the throne. That means he ruled till his 70th year!
(Here again the year is not what we think as 365 days. The solar year has 360
days. (The sun travels a degree a day and completes
one round of the zodiac of 360 degrees in 360 days). How do we explain this
moving away from the conventional thinking of Kaliyuga of 432, 000 years Dwaparyuga of 864, 000 years, 1,296, 000 years
of Tretayuga and 1, 728, 000 years of Krityuga? The four Yugas of Krita, Treta,
Dwapara and Kali taken together are called Divya Yuga. According to Puranas,
Rama appears only once in the Day of Brahma that is 4.32X10 raised to the power
9.
The precession (caused by gradual rotation of the Earth’s axis) of the equinoxes is the period of time that it takes the Earth’s axis to pass through one complete cycle of the zodiac. It takes the planet 72 years to pass through one degree of the zodiac and 25,920 years to complete one full circle of 360 degrees. One half of the journey takes 12,960 years and covers the four yugas. Satya Yuga lasts 5184 years. Treta Yuga lasts 3888 years. Dwapara Yuga lasts 2592 years. Kali Yuga lasts 1296 years. These four yugas taken together come to a total of 12,960 years. (All in modern concept of years)
The precession (caused by gradual rotation of the Earth’s axis) of the equinoxes is the period of time that it takes the Earth’s axis to pass through one complete cycle of the zodiac. It takes the planet 72 years to pass through one degree of the zodiac and 25,920 years to complete one full circle of 360 degrees. One half of the journey takes 12,960 years and covers the four yugas. Satya Yuga lasts 5184 years. Treta Yuga lasts 3888 years. Dwapara Yuga lasts 2592 years. Kali Yuga lasts 1296 years. These four yugas taken together come to a total of 12,960 years. (All in modern concept of years)
There
is one more reference that we get from Hanuman Chalisa
"yuga sahasra yojana par bhanu"
1 Yuga - 12,000 years
1 sahasra - 1000
1 yojana - 8 miles
yuga X sahasra X yojana = par bhanu
12,000 X 1000 X 8 miles = 96000000 miles (is conflates with science)
This is the distance between the earth and the sun (Bhanu)
So 1 yuga is 12,000 years in present terms which is divided into 4 (chathur) yugas.
"yuga sahasra yojana par bhanu"
1 Yuga - 12,000 years
1 sahasra - 1000
1 yojana - 8 miles
yuga X sahasra X yojana = par bhanu
12,000 X 1000 X 8 miles = 96000000 miles (is conflates with science)
This is the distance between the earth and the sun (Bhanu)
So 1 yuga is 12,000 years in present terms which is divided into 4 (chathur) yugas.
Yukteswara
arrived at a figure of 12000 years for Chaturyuga based on Padma Purana and Jain concept. Yukteswar also clarified in the book The
Holy Science (1894), that a complete Yuga Cycle takes 24,000 years, and
is comprised of an ascending cycle of 12,000 years when virtue gradually increases
and a descending cycle of another 12,000 years, in which virtue gradually
decreases. Hence, after we complete a 12,000 year descending cycle from Satya
Yuga -> Kali Yuga, the sequence reverses itself, and an ascending cycle of
12,000 years begins which goes from Kali Yuga -> Satya Yuga. Yukteswar
states that, “Each of these periods of 12,000 years brings a complete change,
both externally in the material world, and internally in the intellectual or
electric world, and is called one of the Daiva Yugas or Electric Couple.” The
24,000 year duration of the complete Yuga Cycle closely approximates the Precessional
Year of 25,920 years, which is the time taken by the sun to “precess” i.e. move
backwards, through the 12 zodiac constellations. Interestingly, the Surya
Siddhanta specifies a value of 54 arc seconds per year for precession, as
against the current value of 50.29 arc seconds per year. This translates into a
Precessional Year of exactly 24,000 years! This raises the possibility that the current observed value of procession may
simply be a temporary deviation from the mean. (Satya=4800 solar years; Treta=3600
solar years; Dwapara=2400 solar years
and Kalki 1200 solar years making 12000
solar years in Chaturyuga)
Across South-East
Asia wherever you go, Lord Rama is revered as a Hero. Ramayana is glorified
throughout the region as a model of ethical behavior, devotion to duty, respect
for parents, gurus etc. Most of the countries have their own versions of
Ramayana(please see appendix), a story that is embedded in their daily lives and culture. It is
unofficially the national epic of many countries. Even in Islamic states like
Indonesia, “Rama Kakavin” or “Rama Kavya” is known to many (played in
Indonesian ballet). Here is the list of various versions of Ramayana across the
world, particularly South and South-East Asia. The Deccan Herald, on 15th
December 1972, on its front page gave the news in which it stated that a story
relating to Ramayana was published in Elista, capital city of Kalmyk, in
Russia. In Leningrad, a great number of books dealing with stories of Ramayana
are still available and preserved even today in Russian and Mongolian
languages. That makes to think that Bharata’s maternal home was somewhere in
Russia.
Several
kings in the Ayutthaya and Thonburi periods are best known
by the title Ramathibodhi ("Overlord Rama"). Ayutthya itself was
borrowed from the name of Rama's capital Ayodhya. All
kings in the current Chakri Dynasty of Thailand often referred to as Rama.
The name Rama was adopted from the name of Rama, the King of Ayodhya in Tretya
Yuga.
Egypt
basically derives its name from Ajpati which is one of the names of forefather
of Rama. If we analyze various legends prevalent in Egypt there we will find
references of Dasratha (father of Rama).
People
of Ethiopia call themselves as descendants of Cushites. This word Cush is
basically phonetic misnomer of Kush, the son of Rama. This fact is verily
established by Satapatha Brahamanas, commentary on Vedas. These Brahamanas
while explaining various mantras of Vedas uses many historical events to
elucidate the topic. Astonishingly in Satapatha Brahamana we find reference
regarding the rule of King Bharata (predecessor of Kauravas and Pandavas) in
Rhodesia.
The Kingdom of Kush was an ancient
kingdom in Nubia, located at the was established after
a century later. During classical antiquity, the Kushite Sudanese and southern
Egyptian Nile Valley.
The Kushite era of rule in Nubia imperial capital was located at Meroë. In early Greek geography, the Meroitic kingdom
was known as Aethiopia. The Kingdom of Kush with its capital at Meroe
persisted until the 4th century AD, when it weakened and disintegrated due to
internal rebellion. The seat was eventually captured and burnt to the ground by
the Kingdom
of Aksum. Afterwards the Nubians established the three, eventually Christianized, kingdoms of Nobatia,
Makuria and Alodia. (Wikipedia).
Similarly,
if we refer to various historical reference in Mahabharata, Valmiki Ramayana
etc. we will find that American Continent has been referred as Patala Desha
(Patala means below foot). If we
geographically see then we will find that American Continent is just below the
Indian Subcontinent (please see the map in the appendix). (p
Ramayana is not the political history of “Ramaravanyoryuddham Ramaravana-yoriva” described in
Yuddhakanda to be highlighted but to teach our children how Rama resisted adharma
starting at the age of 14 and eventually triumphed over them….
To be a history in the true sense…the work must be the story of the people
inhabiting a country. It must be a record of their life from age to age
presented through the life and achievements of men whose exploits become the
beacon of lights of the tradition…the
central purpose of a history must…be to investigate and unfold the values which
age after age would inspire the inhabitants of a country to develop their
collective will. The world has to catch a glimpse of her soul (Ramarajya) as
Indians see it. That is why the name Rama and Ayodhya immortalized
by Valmiki echoes in the air all over the world from California to Russia after
countless number of years which we are intriguing!! May be in the process he had to push Sita to
background but pull Hanuman to forefront!
Ramayana
is not mythological epic but it bears historical testimony. According to W H
Prescott there is popular legend in
Aztec community which states that a beautiful person named Quetzal Kata came
there from east and taught them various aspects of advanced civilization as a
result his period was treated as golden era. He then went back to his original
homeland because of persecution by some divine creature. This legends
surprisingly does not throw light on
the reasons why he returned.
Another
interesting fact that has been stated by Prescott is that this legend is
available in documented form. Now, none except Indian tradition can claim that
they bear root to this legend. The same story has been narrated in Valmiki
Ramayana, in Uttarakanda where it is mentioned that Salcantay Rakshas who dwelt
in Lanka were persecuted by Vishnu. Due to this persecution they left Lanka and
went to Patala Desha. The leader of this group was Sumali. According to
Ramayana they lived in Patala Desha for long time. When they found condition
congenial they returned to their homeland.
Beautiful
girl in Mexican tribal area till today is called as Ulopy. If we see in
Mahabharata we find reference of Arjuna marrying girl named Ulopy (Ulupi) who
was daughter of King of Patala Desha.
It
is for readers to decide when such conclusive proof are there to establish that
epic of Ramayana is not mythological legend but it is historical evidence which
bears testimony to various legends prevalent around the world. Till today play
named Ramasitotav is played in
various communities of Mexico. To our amazement Rama has been mentioned in
Bible, New Testament, Mathew chapter 2/18, where it is mentioned “A
voice was heard in RAMAH”. Ramah is proper noun there, now it is for
Biblical society to define who that Ramah was and why he has been mentioned in
Bible. Even the name of Dasaratha and Ayodhya are there in Bible. Some of the
questions for which we need answer are: Why month of fasting among Muslims is
called Ramadhan? Why place in Gaza strip
is called Ramallaha? Why place in London
is named as Ram’s gate? Why capital of Italy is known as Rome (misnomer of Rama).
In many South-east Asian Buddhist
countries like Thailand, Cambodia etc. Lord Rama is held as the ideal King.
Even kings in these countries have used the name Rama and symbolisms in the
ceremonies to show the resemblance to Ayodhya. Names of ancient cities like
Ayutthaya (Ayodhya in the local language), Bali etc. were indeed based on the
life story of Rama. In Thailand, though the King was Buddhist, he established his royal credentials
by identifying himself with the virtuous king Lord Rama.
As
per the Korean folklore, Queen Suriratna (Heo
Hwang-ok) was a princess in ancient Ayodhya who travelled to Korea 2,000 years
ago (48 AD) and married a king of the Kim community. It is believed by the Kim
people of Korea that a princess of Ayodhya had gone to South Korea who got
married to a King Kim Suro. According to some Korean historians, there are more
than six million present-day Koreans, of which the majority are from Gimhae Kim
clan with surnames Heo and O
Lee/Yi that trace their lineage to the legendary queen. During this year’s Deepawali celebration the
nation keenly focused its eyes at the festival celebration in Ayodhya, where Uttar Pradesh Chief
Minister Yogi Adityanath’s speech evoked a rare curiosity among people and the
presence of South Korean First Lady Kim Jungwho added an
international flavor to the occasion. Due to its historical
backdrop, Ayodhya is a place which is deep-rooted in the memory and emotion of
people of India.
Despite its cultural and spiritual
significance, it may not be wrong to say that over the years Ayodhya has made
headlines only in the context of court dispute and otherwise
treated as yet another place in the map.
The Modi Government at the Centre has been greatly contributing to this
whole process of re-imagining Ayodhya on the lines of its historical splendor.
Deepawali
marks the return of Lord Rama to Ayodhya after 14 years of exile. In the
year 2017 people watched a grand Deepawali celebration in Ayodhya. The
world witnessed the splendor of about 1.71 lakh earthen lamps lit on the banks
of the Sarayu River. This year Deepawali celebration in Ayodhya planned the setting up of a grand statue of
Lord Ram in Ayodhya that will become a landmark for the city. South Korean
First Lady Kim Jung laid the foundation stone for Rs. 50 crore monument in the
name of ancient era South Korean Queen Heo Hwang-ok. The story is that this
queen known in India as ‘Suriratna’ belonged to Ayodhya and went all
the way to South Korea in 48 AD and married the King. Thus, a larger cultural
significance of Ayodhya has been conveyed to the world by having Lady Kim who
belongs to the Suriratna (meaning gem
of Sun in Sanskrit) dynasty as a Deepawali guest.
Ramani’s blog and other Western researchers do support the date of Red Indians to 20000 years as migrants of the ancient land of India. You are perhaps aware of Horse Island ad Ash Island in USA. California is believed to be Kapilaranya (Chandrasekharendra Saraswati) reminding the story of Ikshvaku King Sagara with horse and the burnt out ashes of his sons? So it is reasonable to assume that Rama ruled California too? Gypsies in Europe are also of Indian origin.Jagadguru Chandra sekha-rendra Saraswati says: “What we call Hinduism today was the universal religion in the past. Looking at the Practice
of Hinduism in many parts of the globe there is no question of certain things
being taken from Bharat (Later British Indian Empire) and introduced into
another country. In the beginning the Vedic Religion was prevalent all over the
world. Later, over the centuries, it must have gone through a process of change
and taken different forms. These forms came to be called the original religions
of these various lands which in the subsequent period, historical times, came
under Buddhism, Jainism, Sikhism, Judaism, Christianity or Islam as the
case may be”
Historically
if India is Ramabhumi and Rama was its earliest ruler, Pakistan and beyond was
Sitabhumi ruled by the earliest rulers Lava, and Kusa who were sons of
Rama. Rama is now firmly established as a historic figure and not a
Puranic myth based on archeological studies and Ayodhya Verdict by Supreme
Court of India. History confirms Lahore is named after Lava who is its earliest
king. It is Rama who was responsible for this partition. When Sita
exhausted all possible venues to unite with Rama who was one track minded on
Prajadharma, she by her power of Pativrata dharma split the land
into two and entered into it. While Rama ruled Eastern part of the
Split Land from Ayodhya that extended as far as Burma and beyond,
Lava and Kusa ruled the Western Part. Lava ruled from Lavapuri
modern Lahore who had conquered Rama as witnessed in Asvamedha
Yajna of Rama. People later tried to unify artificially but the curse of Sita
remained and finally partition took place in 1947.
Janakpur in today’s Nepal is the
birthplace of Sita. In May 2018, PM Modi and Nepal Prime Minister together
flagged off Janakpur-Ayodhya bus service.
India also announced Rs. 100 crore for the development of Janakpur. In
January 2018, Delhi hosted a five days Ramayana Festival which witnessed the
participation of 10 ASEAN (Association of South East Asian Nations) countries.
Thus there is a sudden spurt to showcase the story of historic Lord Rama to the
world.
“Hindus
had to patiently fight for 150 years in a charade of a justice system to just
get one temple of Ayodhya back. I want every desecrated or destroyed Hindu temple
restored. I want all temple lands to be returned to the temple. I want Indian
Christians and Muslims to realize that amity among communities is only possible
when there is reciprocity. If they want us to respect their religious
sentiments then they must learn to respect ours. And that begins with
expressing remorse for the destruction of Hindu temples by Christian and Muslim
fanatics. It begins with reforming Christianity and Islam to remove the hatred
which caused the destruction in the first place" says Sree Maa from New
Zealand.
But
surprisingly Pakistan has started the process by establishing two corridors--Kartarpur and Sharada, while
Hindus and Muslims in India have not
compromised to realize the changing winds while Christians in India are
sitting on the fence. If even Pakistan has shown the way today why not Muslims,
Christians, and Hindus in India. Of
course Indians are always Late Latish!
But once they wake up they are strong! Both Maa and I have left India
long back and our views are impartial and our only wish is for people to live
in Peace but not in Pieces. I do not
feel such a problem in USA. But here in
USA Hindus, Muslims, Jews Christians and others walk all together away from
religion, are tied up in universal binding force of love and
call themselves SBNR not knowing what that Spirituality is! Hope they do not turn Atheists like
Communist China! What is the use of gaining the Whole World when we have lost
our own Soul?
All the
above historic evidences stated by me and the timely efforts by Modi Government
at the Centre and UP Government after the Ayodhya Verdict paves the way for the re-emergence of the
ancient city Ayodhya on a global scale.
Ayodhya means a city that is unconquerable. Since Ayodhya
symbolizes as a Capital city of Dharma,
Universal Law, Ancient heritage and cultural propagation in India, its
re-emergence is of a great value for not only India but the whole world to live in peace.
Ayodhya means a city that is not vulnerable to any kind of wars and Invincible.
People of all other faiths in India besides Hindus should raise to the
occasion and show their spirit of secular nature of India to the world by
liberally contributing mentally and physically to rebuild Ayodhya as directed
by the Supreme Court of India.
We can no longer dismiss Rama as a mythological
figure and avatar exclusively, but
inclusive as Emperor of the whole world because the modern history of
British says Brittan conquered and ruled Indian Empire which was
part of Ramarajya of Ikshwakus. Therefore Ayodhya Verdict is not a verdict of
Rama Janma Bhumi or Babri Masjid. Indian Empire that got split has
its early history older than 10k years and doesn't start from 712
A.D. Pakistan and INDIA should encourage thesis on Indus/Gandhara Valley
civilization and Ramarajya civilization. Even British India Empire
consisted of present Pakistan, India, Bangladesh, Burma and even Tibet, Nepal
and Bhutan. Later they too got caught in splitting and giving away as
gifts to Prince of Wales lands while focusing on the process of
integrating troubled British Isles of Ireland, Scotland and England. The
peremptory task is to establish true history jointly by India, Pakistan and
Bangladesh. Such history researchers and students must be supported through
partnership programs at mainstream level so they could do their work
in an effective united way. That would help to live in
peace but not in pieces. Bangladesh should also join hands in breaking all the
artificial religious walls. Religious tourism can be excellent
opportunity in this regard where Pakistan can attract Hindu and Buddhist
pilgrims.
This wisdom has just sprouted as reported earlier
creating corridor paths to visit holy shrines. If UNO is successfully working why not this
Ancient Aryavarta Union function with its own set of constitution and MOU with
Ayodhya as its Global Peace Head Quarters that is Invincible to all hates
and prejudices like UNO Headquarters in New York?
APPENDIX I:
Ramayana in various countries.
APPENDIX II
Description of the
City of Ayodhya
We
enter the capital of the Emperor Dasharatha. The pomp and glory of his capital
is depicted [described] along with its town planning and grandeur
[magnificence] of the city, and it’s resident in Balakanda of Ramayana
sarvaa
puurvam iyam yesaam aasiit kritsnaa vasu.ndhara | prajapaim tupaadaaya
nripaanam jaya shaalinaam ||1-5-1
yeshaam
sa sagaro naama saagaro yena khaanitah | sastih putra sahasraani yam yaantam
paryavaarayan ||1-5-2
ikshvaakuunaam
idam tesaam raajnaam va.mshe mahaatmanaam | mahad utpannam aakhyanam
raamaayanam iti shrutam || 1-5-3
[1-5-1-3]
sahitam
shrotavyam anasuuyataa || 1-5-4tadidam vartayisyaavah
sarvam nikhilam aaditah | dharma kaama artha Once upon a time,
under which victorious kings, this entire
earth with all its islands is there,
starting from Prajapati; among which kings there is one named Sagara, who deepened [to make deep] the
oceans, and whom his sixty thousand sons were fencing [the art or practice
of attack and defense] in when he is set out for action; in the dynasty of such
of those Ikshvaku kings this highly revered and reputed epic Ramayana is
originated.
Being such a legend,
we two wish to relate this Ramayana entirely and completely from the beginning,
which is endowed with the values and means of probity [adherence to the highest
principles and ideals], prosperity, and pleasure seeking... and this be
listened without any caviling [to raise trivial objections]. [1-5-4]
kosalo
naama muditah sphiito janapado mahaan |ivista sarayuu tiire prabhuuta dhana
dhaanyavaan || 1-5-5 ||
A great kingdom named
Kosala, a joyous and a vast one well flourishing with money and cereals, is
snugly [closely and comfortably] situated on the riverbanks of Sarayu. [1-5-5]
ayodhyaa
naama nagarii tatra aasiit loka vishrutaa |manunaa maanava indrena yaa purii
nirmitaa svayam || 1-5-6
A world-renowned city
is there in that kingdom, which is personally built by Manu, the foremost ruler
of mankind. [1-4-6]
aayataa
dasha cha dve cha yojanaani mahaapurii |shriimatii triini vistiirnaa su
vibhaktaa mahaapathaa || 1-5-7
That glorious city
with well-devised highways is twelve yojana-s that is around 120 miles
lengthwise [Yojana is an ancient measure of distance, where one yojana roughly
equals to 8 to 10 miles] and three yojana-s breadth wise that is around 30 miles breadth. [1-5-7]
raaja
maargena mahataa suvibhaktena shobhitaa | muktaa puspa avakiirnena jala siktena
nityashah || 1-5-8
That city shines
forth with well-laid great royal highways that are always wetted [to keep wet]
with water, and with flowers strewn and scattered on them. [1-5-8]
taam
tu raajaa dasharatho mahaaraastra vivardhanah | puriim aavaasayaamaasa divi
devapatih yathaa || 1-5-9
As an improver [make
better] of great kingdom Dasharatha the king made her as his abode, as Indra
made heavens as his abode. [1-5-9]
kapaata
toranavartii su vibhakta antaraapanaam | sarva yantra ayudhavatiim usitaam
sarva shilpibhih || 1-5-10
That city is
surrounded with gateways and archways; the front yards of buildings are well
laid; it is lodges all kinds of machinery, weaponry and craftsmen, and king
Dasharatha dwells in such a city. [1-4-10]
suuta
maagadha sa.nbaadhaam shriimatiim atula prabhaam | Uchaattaala dhvajavatiim
shataghnii shata sa.nkulaam || 1-5-11
She that prosperous
city Ayodhya is much crammed [tightly packed] with many a eulogist and
panegyrist [eulogist or panegyrist – one who speak or write in high praise],
yet she is highly splendorous with many a bastion [fortified areas or
positions], flag and hundreds of batteries of canons, and Dasharatha dwells
therein. [1-5-11]
vadhuu
naataka sanghaih cha sanyuktaam sarvatah puriim | udyaana aamra vanopetaam
mahatiim saala mekhalaam || 1-5-12
That city Ayodhya
accommodates groups of danseuses [a female ballet dancer] and theatrical
personnel, and she is surrounded everywhere with the gardens and brakes [marshy
land overgrown usually with one kind of plant] of mango trees, and her wide
fort-wall is like her cincture [circling] ornament. [1-5-12]
durga
gambhiira parikhaam durgaam anyaih duraasadam | vaajiivaarana sa.npuurnaam
gobhih ustraih kharaih tathaa || 1-5-13
That Ayodhya is an
impassable [incapable of being passed, traveled, crossed, or surmounted] one
for trespassers, or for others invaders, owing to her impassable and profound
moats [a deep and wide trench around the rampart of a fortified place (as a
castle) that is usually filled with water], and she is abounding with horses,
camels, likewise with cows and donkeys. [1-5-13]
saama.nta
raaja sanghaih cha bali karmabhih aavritam | naanaa desha nivaasaih cha
vanigbhih upashobhitaam || 1-5-14
With the throngs
[host] of provincial [a country or region brought under the control of the
ruler] kings who come hither to this place] to pay dues pervade that city, and
she is verily lustrous [bright] with residents of various other countries, and
with traders, too. In such a city Dasharatha dwells. [1-5-14]
praasaadai
ratna vikritaih parvataih iva shobhitaam | kuutaagaaraih cha sa.npuurnaam
indrasya iva amaraavatiim |1-5-15
Buildings are
ornamentally studded with precious gems, and with such multi-storied sky
scrapers she is adorned, and filled with them she is like Amaravati, the
capital of Indra. [1-5-15]
chitram
astaapada aakaaraam vara naarii ganair yutaam | sarva ratna samaakiirnaam
vimaana griha shobhitaam || 1-5-16
Amazing is Ayodhya
for its lay-out is like a game board called astapadi, and with its flocks of
beautiful women moving thereabout, where all kinds of precious gems are heaped
up, and where its seven storied buildings are picturesque. [1-5-16]
griha
gaadhaam avicchidraam sama bhuumau niveshitaam | shaali tandula sa.npuurnaam
ikshu kaanda rasah udakaam ||1-5-17
The housing is very
dense and there is no place or ground unutilized, and all are constructed on
well-leveled lands, and rice-grain is plentiful while the drinking water tastes
like sugar cane juice. [1-5-17]
dundubhiibhih
mridangaih cha viinaabhih panavaih tathaa | naaditaam bhrisham atyartham
prithivyaam taam anuttamaam ||1-5-18
That city is sounding
with the drumbeats of great drums, and with musical rhythm instruments like
mridanga, cymbals [a concave brass plate that produces a brilliant clashing
tone is used in pairs], and with string instruments like Veena etc., and on
earth she is uniquely the best city. [1-5-18]
vimaanam
iva siddhaanaam tapasa adhigatam divi | su niveshita veshmaantaam narottama
samaavritaam ||1-5-19
Ayodhya is like a
hovering [to hang fluttering in the air] space station attained by sages by
their ascesis [practicing strict self-denial as a measure of personal and
especially spiritual discipline], and its edifices [buildings] are well planned
and it is teeming [filled] with best people. [1-4-19]
ye
cha baanaih na vidhyanti viviktam aparaa param | shabda vedhyam cha vitatam
laghu hastaa vishaaradaah || 1-5-20
They the skillful
archers of that Ayodhya will not kill a lone one with their arrows, one that does
not have either a predecessor or a successor in his family, a fleeing one, or
by listening to the sound of the target (as is done in sonic-archery), and
their skills, acumen [keenness and depth of perception] and handiness are thus
benevolent [organized for the purpose of doing good]. [1-5-20]
sinha
vyaaghra varaahaanaam mattaanaam nadataam vane | hantaaro nishitaih shastraih
balaat baahu balair api || 1-5-21
They kill the
fattened and roaring lions, tigers and wild boars with the might of their sharp
weaponry, or even with the might of their own arms alone. [1-4-21]
taadrishaanaam
sahasraih taam abhi puurnaam mahaarathaih | puriim aavasayamaasa raajaa dasharathah tadaa || 1-5-22
With that kind of
thousands of archers, and with speediest chariot-warriors she that Ayodhya is
filled with, and King Dasharatha made his abode in such a city. [1-5-22]
taam
agnimadbhih gunavadbhih aavritaamdvijottamaih veda sadanga paaragaih |
sahasradaih satya rataih mahaatmabhih maharsi kalpaih risibhih cha kevalaih || 1-5-23
She that Ayodhya is
encompassed with Vedic scholars who always worship the ritual fire by
enkindling the three kinds of ritual-fires continuously, virtuous Brahman
scholars in Veda-s and their six ancillary subjects, and other great souls that
are in similitude with great saints, and who are just like sages that are
charitable donors, and that abide by the truth. [1-5-23]
iti vaalmiiki raamaayane aadi kaavye
baala kaande pa.ncamah sargah
Thus, this is the
5th chapter in Bala Kanda of Valmiki Ramayana, the First Epic poem
The Spirit of Maharshi Valmiki and the Greatest Gift
Indians can Offer to the Sri Rama Mandir
How Maharshi Valmiki and Bhagavan Veda
Vyasa “wrote” the Ramayana and the Mahabharata are profound stories by
themselves. Both these Maharshis authored their immortal Sanatana works in a
state of deep, meditative contemplation during which they first visualized their
respective epics and then put the proverbial pen to paper. Small wonder that
the Sanatana tradition accords both the Ramayana and the Mahabharata the status
of a Darshana (philosophy) understood in the sense of being all-encompassing
and exuding universal appeal and relevance. This method of “writing” is
something that continues to endure to this day among the writers and authors
who are derisively branded as “traditionalists” and “purists” by artistic and
literary philistines. This method is akin to bearing the Kavya-Shishu (infant
of literature/poetry) like a mother bears her child in her womb and nourishes
it with all the vital elements (loosely speaking, all the Rasas) of her entire
Being.
And so, when the Tattiriya Upanishad
says raso vai saḥ | rasaṃ
hyevāyaṃ
labdhvānaṃdī
bhavati ||
Paramatman
is Rasa. Therefore, we obtain Joy or Bliss from the experience of Rasa. That
which has the capacity to provide this Joy or Bliss is Rasa.
And when we extend this immortal
Upanishadic verse in the realm of literature, it translates itself as
Kavya-Ananda or Literary Joy obtained from the pursuit of such exalted works as
the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. Indeed, very early in the Ramayana, Maharshi
Valmiki himself says that:
rasaiH
shRingaara karuNa haasya raudra bhayaanakaiH |
viraadibhii rasair yuktam kaavyam etat agaayataam || (Balakanda: 4:9)
Aesthetic elements like romance, pathos, comedy, fury, fright, valor etc., embodied in the epic is sung [by Lava and Kusha].
viraadibhii rasair yuktam kaavyam etat agaayataam || (Balakanda: 4:9)
Aesthetic elements like romance, pathos, comedy, fury, fright, valor etc., embodied in the epic is sung [by Lava and Kusha].
Indeed, Srimad Ramayana does two things
simultaneously: at the most mundane level, it provides unbounded entertainment
as a simple story which unfolds in a linear fashion. On a higher plane, it a
vast and timeless reservoir that offers inspiration, compassion, enrichment, a
zest for life, and above all, is a great source of solace for coping with
physical, psychological, moral, ethical and spiritual tribulations. The iconic
D.V. Gundappa memorably says that Srimad Ramayana offers Jivotkarsha (Elevation
of Life). It is a wretched tragedy of “modern” life that the so-called educated
Indians willingly, gladly burn their pockets to buy and read or listen to a
copious array of meaningless filth branded as “self-help,” “personality
development,” and so on. Its latest incarnation is something called “life
coach,” a euphemism for handing over one’s own life to expensive psychos—all
this despite the fact that there exist tons of Ramayanas in all languages at
all price ranges right in our own backyard.
It is precisely this all-encompassing
and timeless quality that has made Srimad Ramayana an irresistible magnet for
poets, writers, singers, dancers, dramatists, film makers, painters, sculptors
and temple-builders for over five thousand years—within both India and outside.
One must not forget the fact that Srimad Ramayana was first sung by Sri
Ramachandra’s own sons: small kids—by itself, this holds an extraordinary
lesson on how parents must bring up their kids.
Indeed, Srimad Ramayana is that
boundless ocean of Amrita that Maharshi Valmiki has left behind for eternity.
No price tag. No copyright. No patent. No rights reserved—no notion of “rights”
even. How do we even begin to fathom the glory of Maharshi Valmiki who almost
singlehandedly founded the Sanatana culture and civilization in his own
inimitable fashion? Think about it: the moral, ethical, familial, social and
national values he seeded more than five thousand years ago still continue
to inform our national life. How does one even repay our debt to him given that
Maharshi Valmiki didn’t treat his work as a loan? As we noticed earlier, every
poet, dramatist, artist, painter, etc. who followed his ayana (path,
course) merely took a drop from this Amrita-ocean and became immortal in
his/her own right: Tulsidas Goswami, Kamban, etc. Equally, as the cultural
history of Bharatavarsha shows, savoring even that single drop has proven
beneficial even to cowherds, fishermen, carpenters, tanners, illiterates,
mendicants, and beggars. Even till the mid or late 1980s, it used to be a
common sight in the “third class” railway bogies where beggars would sing poems
and songs based on themes from Srimad Ramayana. What was the Old or New
Education Policy that laid the foundation for this sort of education? It is the
same education policy that also educated a traditional Srivaishnava Acharya,
Sri Krishnabrahmatantra Yatindra whose moving Ramayana Bhakti has been described in an earlier essay on The
Dharma Dispatch.
The
Ramayana Analysts
One must essentially develop a healthy
and civilization -rooted attitude of contempt towards Ramayana analysts
irrespective of their ideological affiliations. This sort of analytical mindset
towards a work like Srimad Ramayana is inherently imbued with artistic
joylessness at best and political utilitarianism at worst. My remark in the previous part of this series, that
Sri Rama Mandir should have never been characterized as a “court case” and
“title dispute” indicates precisely this. What the Ramayana analysts of
differing ideological persuasions forget or are ignorant of is how their own
native tradition regards Srimad Ramayana: as a Parayana-Grantha and a Dharma-Grantha.
Consider the very first line of the very first Sloka of Srimad Ramayana:
तपःस्वाध्यायनिरतं
तपस्वी वाग्विदां
वरम् |
नारदं परिपप्रच्छ वाल्मीकिर्मुनिपुङ्गवम् ||
नारदं परिपप्रच्छ वाल्मीकिर्मुनिपुङ्गवम् ||
The Muni Valmiki inquired Naarada, ‘who
was deeply engaged in austerity and study of Vedas, who was the most exalted
among the eloquent and eminent among sages.’
In other words, Srimad Ramayana begins
with a heartfelt question that the human Rishi Valmiki asks the Divine Rishi,
Narada. And what prompts Valmiki to ask
this question? It is this celebrated verse that inspired him to write Srimad
Ramayana:
मा
निषाद प्रतिष्ठां
त्वमगमः
शाश्वतीः
समाः |
यत् क्रौञ्चमिथुनादेकमवधीः काममोहितम् || (Balakanda: 2.15)
यत् क्रौञ्चमिथुनादेकमवधीः काममोहितम् || (Balakanda: 2.15)
Oh! Violent Hunter, by which reason you
have killed one bird of the couple, who were engaged in the sport of love? For
your cruel deed, may you never obtain rest for everlasting years!
Among others, this is the specific context
for the origin of Srimad Ramayana. By what stretch of imagination does one even
“analyze” this on an intellectual plane much less vulgarize it using soulless
theories of sociology, anthropology and even secularism, which are of
really recent origin? In the limited scope of my reading, I’m yet to come
across even one such “analysis” of Srimad Ramayana that does one of the
following:
- Offers a new or fresh insight into some aspect of Srimad Ramayana.
- Provides artistic or literary or musical delight.
- Opens up new or innovative possibilities to better savor Srimad Ramayana.
The declared goal of one section of
Ramayana Analysts is to intentionally vilify it in order to destroy it. Which
is precisely why they purposely omit any mention of the sheer soul delight
Srimad Ramayana offers. But what excuse does the other section of the Ramayana
Analysts have when they rebut these Ramayana destroyers using the same verbiage
and tactics in the grand hope that the outcome would somehow be different? In
both cases, we notice the same approach: that of a surgeon whose scalpel
repeatedly cuts the poet, Maharshi Valmiki. And to both sections, Maharshi
Valmiki’s curse is equally is equally applicable.
The
Sanatana Approacha
cable:
of not finding peace anywhere. However, there is a third approach: the
time-honored Sanatana approach. Of offering reverence to Srimad Ramayana by
identifying with the spirit of Maharshi Valmiki. Our respectful and modest
saluations are due to those scholars engaged in a Samskara-neutral quest for
dating Srimad Ramayanam as also trying to “prove” whether Sri Ramachandra was
indeed a “real” historical person. The Sanatana approach will be better served
for example, by adhering to the contemporary Rishi D.V. Gundappa:
The Ramayana is not history but a
historical poem. When one regards a historical episode from the perspective of
realism, it becomes history: merely, history. However, when we regard it
from the perspective of an event that has the capacity to transform our hearts,
it becomes poetry—a poem that is far more effective and impactful than mere
imaginative poetry. The Ramayana is a poem that has internalized history in
an unparalleled, transformative fashion. This is why it has acquired nationwide
[and even global] acceptance and reverence as if it a real historical fact
including all details. The Ramayana definitely contains historical material.
But beyond this superficiality, it is also material that innately refines our
heart. It is the history of a country; but more profoundly, it is the
history of the Atman of our people. [D.V. Gundappa: Preface:
Srimad Valmiki Ramayanam: Translated into Kannada by Vidwan N. Ranganatha
Sarma. p xii. Emphasis added]
Our ardent hope is that the designers,
artists, sculptors and the entire team involved in building the upcoming Grand
Sri Ramachandra Temple at Ayodhya take this essence of Srimad Ramayana as they
undertake this sacred and defining civilizational-epochal task. And even as the
construction begins on Sri Rama
Navami, circa 2020, a befitting duty to accompany this sacred endeavor on the
part of every Indian across Bharatavarsha is to gift a copy of Srimad Ramayana
across the country to at least one new person he or she meets.
The
Spirit of Maharshi Valmiki and the Greatest Gift Indians can Offer to the Sri
Rama Mandir
How
Maharshi Valmiki and Bhagavan Veda Vyasa “wrote” the Ramayana and the
Mahabharata are profound stories by themselves. Both these Maharshis authored
their immortal Sanatana works in a state of deep, meditative contemplation
during which they first visualized their respective epics and then put
the proverbial pen to paper. Small wonder that the Sanatana tradition accords
both the Ramayana and the Mahabharata the status of a Darshana (philosophy)
understood in the sense of being all-encompassing and exuding universal appeal
and relevance. This method of “writing” is something that continues to endure
to this day among the writers and authors who are derisively branded as
“traditionalists” and “purists” by artistic and literary philistines. This
method is akin to bearing the Kavya-Shishu (infant of literature/poetry)
like a mother bears her child in her womb and nourishes it with all the vital
elements (loosely speaking, all the Rasas) of her entire Being. And so, when
the Tattiriya Upanishad says
raso vai saḥ
|rasaṃ
hyevāyaṃ
labdhvānaṃdī
bhavati ||
Paramatman is
Rasa. Therefore, we obtain Joy or Bliss from the experience of Rasa. That which
has the capacity to provide this Joy or Bliss is Rasa.
And
when we extend this immortal Upanishadic verse in the realm of literature, it
translates itself as Kavya-Ananda or Literary Joy obtained from the pursuit of
such exalted works as the Ramayana and the Mahabharata. Indeed, very early in
the Ramayana, Maharshi Valmiki himself says that
rasaiH
shRingaara karuNa haasya raudra bhayaanakaiH |
viraadibhii rasair yuktam kaavyam etat agaayataam || (Balakanda: 4:9)
viraadibhii rasair yuktam kaavyam etat agaayataam || (Balakanda: 4:9)
Aesthetic
elements like romance, pathos, comedy, fury, fright, valour etc., embodied in
the epic is sung [by Lava and Kusha].
Indeed,
Srimad Ramayana does two things simultaneously: at the most mundane level, it
provides unbounded entertainment as a simple story which unfolds in a linear
fashion. On a higher plane, it a vast and timeless reservoir that offers
inspiration, compassion, enrichment, a zest for life, and above all, is a great
source of solace for coping with physical, psychological, moral, ethical and
spiritual tribulations. The iconic D.V. Gundappa memorably says that Srimad
Ramayana offers Jivotkarsha (Elevation of Life). It is a wretched
tragedy of “modern” life that the so-called educated Indians willingly, gladly
burn their pockets to buy and read or listen to a copious array of meaningless
filth branded as “self-help,” “personality development,” and so on. Its latest
incarnation is something called “life coach,” a euphemism for handing over
one’s own life to expensive psychos—all this despite the fact that there exist
tons of Ramayanas in all languages at all price ranges right in our own
backyard.
It
is precisely this all-encompassing and timeless quality that has made Srimad
Ramayana an irresistible magnet for poets, writers, singers, dancers,
dramatists, film makers, painters, sculptors and temple-builders for over five
thousand years—within both India and outside. One must not forget the fact that
Srimad Ramayana was first sung by Sri Ramachandra’s own sons: small
kids—by itself, this holds an extraordinary lesson on how parents must bring up
their kids.
Indeed,
Srimad Ramayana is that boundless ocean of Amrita that Maharshi Valmiki has
left behind for eternity. No price tag. No copyright. No patent. No rights
reserved—no notion of “rights” even. How do we even begin to fathom the glory
of Maharshi Valmiki who almost singlehandedly founded the Sanatana
culture and civilization in his own inimitable fashion? Think about it: the
moral, ethical, familial, social and national values he seeded more than five
thousand years ago still continue to inform our national life. How does one
even repay our debt to him given that Maharshi Valmiki didn’t treat his work as
a loan? As we noticed earlier, every poet, dramatist, artist, painter, etc.,
who followed his ayana (path, course) merely took a drop from this
Amrita-ocean and became immortal in his/her own right: Tulsidas Goswami,
Kamban, etc. Equally, as the cultural history of Bharatavarsha shows, savouring
even that single drop has proven beneficial even to cowherds, fishermen,
carpenters, tanners, illiterates, mendicants, and beggars. Even till the mid or
late 1980s, it used to be a common sight in the “third class” railway bogies
where beggars would sing poems and songs based on themes from Srimad Ramayana.
What was the Old or New Education Policy that laid the foundation for this sort
of education? It is the same education policy that also educated a traditional
Srivaishnava Acharya, Sri Krishnabrahmatantra Yatindra whose moving
Ramayana Bhakti has been described
in an earlier essay on The Dharma Dispatch.
The
Ramayana Analysts
One
must essentially develop a healthy and civilisationally-rooted attitude of
contempt towards Ramayana analysts irrespective of their ideological
affiliations. This sort of analytical mindset towards a work like Srimad Ramayana
is inherently imbued with artistic joylessness at best and political
utilitarianism at worst. My remark in the previous
part of this series, that Sri Rama Mandir should have never been
characterized as a “court case” and “title dispute” indicates precisely this.
What the Ramayana analysts of differing ideological persuasions forget or are
ignorant of is how their own native tradition regards Srimad Ramayana: as a Parayana-Grantha
and a Dharma-Grantha. Consider the very first line of the very first
Sloka of Srimad Ramayana:
तपःस्वाध्यायनिरतं तपस्वी वाग्विदां वरम् | नारदं परिपप्रच्छ वाल्मीकिर्मुनिपुङ्गवम् ||
The
Muni Valmiki inquired Naarada, ‘who was deeply engaged in austerity and study
of Vedas, who was the most exalted among the eloquent and eminent among sages.’
In
other words, Srimad Ramayana begins with a heartfelt question that the human
Rishi Valmiki asks the Divine Rishi, Narada. And what prompts Valmiki to ask
this question? It is this celebrated verse that inspired him to write Srimad
Ramayana:
मा निषाद प्रतिष्ठां त्वमगमः शाश्वतीः समाः | यत् क्रौञ्चमिथुनादेकमवधीः काममोहितम् || (Balakanda: 2.15)
Oh! Violent Hunter, by which reason you have killed one bird of the couple, who were engaged in the sport of love? For your cruel deed, may you never obtain rest for everlasting years!
Oh! Violent Hunter, by which reason you have killed one bird of the couple, who were engaged in the sport of love? For your cruel deed, may you never obtain rest for everlasting years!
Among
others, this is the specific context for the origin of Srimad Ramayana.
By what stretch of imagination does one even “analyze” this on an intellectual
plane much less vulgarize it using soulless theories of sociology, anthropology
and even secularism, which are of really recent origin? In the limited
scope of my reading, I’m yet to come across even one such “analysis” of
Srimad Ramayana that does one of the following:
- Offers a new or fresh insight into some aspect of Srimad Ramayana.
- Provides artistic or literary or musical delight.
- Opens up new or innovative possibilities to better savour Srimad Ramayana.
The
declared goal of one section of Ramayana Analysts is to intentionally vilify it
in order to destroy it. Which is precisely why they purposely omit any mention
of the sheer soul delight Srimad Ramayana offers. But what excuse does the other
section of the Ramayana Analysts have when they rebut these Ramayana destroyers
using the same verbiage and tactics in the grand hope that the outcome would
somehow be different? In both cases, we notice the same approach: that of a
surgeon whose scalpel repeatedly cuts the poet, Maharshi Valmiki. And to both
sections, Maharshi Valmiki’s curse is equally applicable--of not finding peace
anywhere.
The
Sanatana Approach
However,
there is a third approach: the time-honored Sanatana approach. Of offering
reverence to Srimad Ramayana by identifying with the spirit of Maharshi
Valmiki. Our respectful and modest salutations are due to those scholars
engaged in a Samskara-neutral quest for
dating Srimad Ramayanam as also trying to “prove” whether Sri Ramachandra was
indeed a “real” historical person. The Sanatana approach will be better
served for example, by adhering to the contemporary Rishi D.V. Gundappa:
The
Ramayana is not history but a historical poem. When one regards a historical
episode from the perspective of realism, it becomes history: merely, history.
However, when we regard it from the perspective of an event that has the
capacity to transform our hearts, it becomes poetry—a poem that is far more
effective and impactful than mere imaginative poetry. The Ramayana is a
poem that has internalized history in an unparalleled, transformative fashion. This
is why it has acquired nationwide [and even global] acceptance and reverence as
if it a real historical fact including all details. The Ramayana definitely contains historical material. But beyond
this superficiality, it is also material that innately refines our heart. It
is the history of a country; but more profoundly, it is the history of the Atman
of our people. [D.V. Gundappa: Preface: Srimad Valmiki Ramayanam:
Translated into Kannada by Vidwan N. Ranganatha Sarma. p xii. Emphasis added]
Our
ardent hope is that the designers, artists, sculptors and the entire team
involved in building the upcoming Grand Sri Ramachandra Temple at Ayodhya take
this essence of Srimad Ramayana as they undertake this sacred and defining
civilizational-epochal task. And even as the construction
begins on Sri Rama Navami, circa 2020, a befitting duty to accompany
this sacred endeavor on the part of every Indian across Bharatavarsha is to
gift a copy of Srimad Ramayana across the country to at least one new person he
or she meets.
No comments:
Post a Comment